Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2403)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-20

    EXH AR021386: Rebuttal to Response to 401/404 Comments, Miller Creek Relocation & Master Plan Update, STIA

    A biologist with Columbia Biological Assessments submitted a formal rebuttal in June 2001 challenging the Port of Seattle's environmental responses related to proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal argues that the Port failed to adequately assess impacts on Miller Creek, particularly regarding fish habitat, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen levels during summer months. The author contends that no proper baseline survey of fish and aquatic organisms was conducted, making regulatory approval and proposed mitigation measures scientifically insufficient.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 09
  • 2001-06-20

    EXH AR023116: Rebuttal to Response to 401/404 Comments, Miller Creek Relocation Project, STIA Master Plan Update

    A biologist from Columbia Biological Assessments submitted a rebuttal in June 2001 challenging the Port of Seattle's environmental justifications for proposed construction improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter argues that the Port failed to adequately assess impacts on Miller Creek, particularly regarding fish habitat, water temperature, and dissolved oxygen levels in a relocated section of the creek. The author contends that no proper baseline survey of fish and aquatic life was conducted, making regulatory approval of the project scientifically premature.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR050641: Draft Technical Memorandum — Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Responds to Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) request regarding whether contaminated ground water below the Aviation Operations
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 21
  • 2001-06-19

    Exhibit 76: Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Evaluates potential contaminant migration from the Aviation Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA) to the third runway construction
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-18

    EXH AR050603: Avoidance of Wetland Impacts, Temporary Stormwater Pond A, Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Hart Crowser, Inc. report prepared for HNTB and the Port of Seattle, project number 4978-06, dated June 18, 2001, addressing avoidance of wetland impacts associated with Temporary Stormwater Pond A for the Sea-Tac Third Runway project. Includes summary of subsurface conditions, protection of wetlands analysis, groundwater seepage analysis, observed groundwater levels in monitoring wells near
    TagsACC, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-06-18

    EXH AR030796: Hart Crowser Letter of Transmittal — Borrow Area 3 Wetland Protection Swale Draft Plans, Third Runway Project

    Hart Crowser Senior Principal Michael Bailey transmits revised draft plans and cross sections for the Borrow Area 3 Wetland Protection Swale (Job No. 4978-06) to Jim Kelley at Parametrix, June 18, 2001. Documents include Figure 1 (Post-Reclamation Topography and Drainage Facilities), Figure 2 (Typical Cross Sections), Figure 3 (Post-Reclamation Topographical Detail), and Figure 4 (Proposed
    TagsACC, Ecology, Hillgrove Cemetery, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-06-18

    EXH AR050666: Letter of Transmittal — Borrow Area 3 Wetland Protection Swale, Third Runway Project

    Letter of transmittal dated June 18, 2001 from Michael Bailey, P.E. (Senior Principal, Hart Crowser) to Jim Kelley at Parametrix, Job No. 4978-06, transmitting four draft figures for the Third Runway Project Borrow Area 3 Wetland Protection Swale: Figure 1 Post-Reclamation Topography and Drainage Facilities, Figure 2 Typical Cross Sections, Figure 3 Post-Reclamation Topographical Detail,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-06-18

    EXH AR029187: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes, June 18, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes from a 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meeting for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway, held June 18, 2001, prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabek (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle), Felix Kristanovich (Foster Wheeler), Paul Fendt
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2001-06-14

    EXH 303: Draft Meeting Notes — Low Flow Analysis, STIA Third Runway 401 Permit, Jun 14, 2001

    These draft meeting notes from a June 14, 2001 technical meeting cover the low flow stream analysis conducted as part of the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for Sea-Tac International Airport's Third Runway project. Attendees from the Department of Ecology, King County, Port of Seattle, and consulting firms identified five additional technical tasks, including verifying groundwater basin calibration parameters for Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek, documenting embankment infiltration rationale, and assessing water availability for proposed low stream flow mitigation measures.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-06-14

    EXH AR029185: Final Meeting Notes — Low Flow Analysis, 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Final meeting notes from June 14, 2001 (1:00–4:00 PM) prepared by Kate Snider, Floyd & Snider Inc., for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabeck (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port Of Seattle), Paul Fendt (Parametrix), Alan Black (HNTB), and
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 11

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 … Page 241
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Port of Seattle Regular Commission Meeting September 22, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 22: 12:00pm
    17801 International Blvd, Seattle, WA 98158
    2026 09 22 rm packet pdf

    Order of Business 10:30 a.m. 1. Call to Order 2. Executive Session – if necessary, pursuant to RCW 42.30.110 (executive sessions are not open to the public) 12:00 p.m. – Public Session Reconvene or Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approval of the Agenda 4. Special Orders of the Day 4a. Presentation of

    [...]
  • Highline Forum Agenda – September 23, 2026
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Sep 23, 2:30pm - 4:30pm
    City of Des Moines, Police Services Building,
    Highline forum agenda final 23sept2026 pdf

    Highline Forum Agenda Theme: Part 150 Update and PortJobs Overview 2:30pm – Convene Meeting/Introductions Port Co-Chair, Commissioner Mohamed 2:35pm – Public Comments Audience The meeting will be held in person and virtually. Those wishing to provide public comment may: 1) Deliver public comment via email; 2) Deliver public comment via Microsoft Teams; or 3) Deliver

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Port Of Seattle Commission Motion in Response to the Findings of the Special Investigative Committee" — , 2008

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V