Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-27

    RP Day 8: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160

    This document is a transcript from Day Eight (March 27, 2002) of a Pollution Control Hearings Board proceeding in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The hearing was held at the Environmental Hearings Office in Lacey, Washington, before a three-member board. Attorneys representing community groups, the state, and the Port of Seattle all appeared to argue issues related to the airport's environmental and noise impacts on surrounding communities.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-26

    RP Day 7: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port — PCHB No. 01-160, Mar 26 2002

    This document is a transcript from Day Seven of a 2002 hearing before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board, in which the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenged the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental issues related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. The proceedings, held in Lacey, Washington from March 26–29, 2002, involved attorneys representing community groups, state environmental regulators, and the Port of Seattle. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) reflects community opposition to the airport's expansion and related environmental and noise concerns.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-26

    EXH AR002044: Offer of Proof Re: Excluded Statements from Dave Garland’s Testimony — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Offer of proof filed by Washington Attorney General Thomas J. Young on behalf of the Department of Ecology, dated March 26, 2002, memorializing excluded statements from Dave Garland’s direct testimony in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). The excluded
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-22

    RP Day 5: ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port, PCHB No. 01-160

    This is a transcript from Day Five (March 22, 2002) of a ten-day administrative hearing held before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board in Lacey, Washington. The case (PCHB No. 01-160) involved the Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion challenging the Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle over environmental concerns related to Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Attorneys representing all four parties appeared before a three-member board chaired by Robert V. Jensen.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 24
  • 2002-03-22

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Strike Certain Pre-Filed Testimony and Limit Oral Testimony

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 22, 2002, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to strike certain pre-filed testimony and limit oral testimony. Board presided by Kaleen Cottingham established February 28, 2002 as discovery cut-off date; parties prohibited from relying on information created after that date. Order restricts Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-19

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Denying ACC’s Motion In Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 19, 2002, denying Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion In Limine to Exclude Late-Produced Plans and Reports. Presided by Kaleen Cottingham; parties represented by Kevin Stock and Michael Witek (ACC), Rick Poulin (CASE), Gillis Reavis (Port Of Seattle), and Jeff Kray (Ecology). Board ruled that the
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-19

    PCHB Doc 28409: Order Granting ACC’s Motion To Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. Depositions under Rule 32(a)(2) conditionally granted for Tom Fitzsimmons, Gordon White, and Ray Hellwig; depositions under Rule 30(b)(6) conditionally granted for Ann Kenny, Erik Stockdale, John Drabek, Kevin
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 11
  • 2002-03-19

    PCHB 01-160: Order Granting ACC’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated March 19, 2002, granting Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to publish depositions of Washington State Department of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. Presiding officer Kaleen Cottingham ruled depositions of Tom Fitzsimmons, Gordon White, and Ray Hellwig conditionally admitted under Rule 32(a)(2); depositions of Ann
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 01
  • 2002-03-19

    Documents catalogued as published in 1994

    This catalog lists documents published in 1994 related to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), covering topics such as aircraft noise, environmental impact statements, airport master plan updates, and regional transportation planning. Sources include the Port of Seattle, the FAA, PSRC, and various aviation consultants, with materials ranging from budget reports and feasibility studies to public briefings and technical reports. The catalog serves as an archival index for researchers and policymakers studying airport expansion, noise management, and aviation growth in the Puget Sound region during the mid-1990s.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, FAA, Port Of Seattle, PSRC, RCAA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderRCAA
  • 2002-03-19

    EXH AR028686: Summary Statement for Deposition Publication — Ann Kenny (Ecology), ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Summary Statement for Deposition Publication submitted pursuant to Order Granting Appellant’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses, dated March 19, 2002, in ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Deponent Ann Kenny, Department of Ecology Federal Permit Coordinator for the Northwest Regional
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 11

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Chapter 3 Affected Environment_73" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V