Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-03

    Exhibit 2212: Email on Fish/Stream Monitoring Conditions for Port Of Seattle Mitigation

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, subject fish/stream monitoring. References Richard Brocksmith (fish biologist) and IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology for stream health monitoring. Proposes monitoring condition language for Port Of Seattle requiring monitoring plan covering temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-03

    Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 Draft Pages 16-17

    A draft of Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 pages 16-17, covering operational stormwater requirements for Sea-Tac Airport (STIA), including the approved Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan and conditions for discharge to state receiving waters. The document addresses retrofitting requirements, flow controls, AKART treatment standards, and conditions under which stormwater may be discharged to state receiving waters following
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017574: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, conveying King County’s technical review findings on the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update (MPU) Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-03

    Water Quality Certification #1996-4-02325 Draft – Operational Stormwater Requirements

    A draft Water Quality Certification document (pages 16-17 of 23) outlining operational stormwater requirements for Port Of Seattle’s Sea-Tac Airport project. The document specifies requirements for the Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan, retrofitting stormwater management facilities, and discharge standards for operational stormwater to state receiving waters. It includes handwritten notes and annotations discussing AKART standards, flow
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH 1268: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    August 3, 2001 letter from Pam Bissonnette, Director, King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SeaTac). King County found
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-03

    PDA Request re Low Flow Analysis

    A paralegal at Helsell Fetterman submits a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request to the Washington State Department of Ecology regarding the Port of Seattle’s new two-volume Low Flow Analysis. The request notes that several sections of the document are either incomplete or entirely missing, including the Introduction and Determination of Impacts to Streamflow. The request
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-08-02

    Review Comments on the Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources review comments on the Port of Seattle’s July 2001 Low Flow Impact Analysis and Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessments, and conceptual designs for reserve storage facilities intended to mitigate low flow impacts in Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, and Walker Creek
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-08-02

    EXH AR017713: Draft 401 Conditions to Address Potential Pathways — Deliberative, Do Not Disclose

    Internal email from Ann Kenny (Ecology) to Ching-Pi Wang, cc Steve Alexander (ECY) and Raymond Hellwig, dated August 2, 2001, transmitting deliberative draft Section 401 water quality certification conditions F1–F4 for the Sea-Tac Airport (STIA) Third Runway Master Plan Update. Conditions address prevention of contaminated groundwater transport from the Airport Maintenance and Operations Area via
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-02

    Exhibit 96: Email — Briefing Material for Governor on Sea-Tac 3rd Runway Project

    Email from Dianne Pastore, Ecology Director’s Office, to Raymond Hellwig and Curt Hart (cc: Thomas Fitzsimmons, Sheryl Hutchison) requesting briefing materials for Tom Fitzsimmons’ meeting with the Governor and Paul Isaki on the SeaTac 3rd Runway Project. Materials requested by Dennis Clark, Governor’s Office, by COB Tuesday August 7, 2001. AR 017821, Exhibit 96.
    TagsACC, Ecology, EIS, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea Tac Airport Lawsuit Map" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V