Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023564: Letter Water Resources Consulting (Peter Willing) to Army Corps & Ecology — STIA Sec 404/401 Permit Low Flow Analysis & Flow Impact Offset Facility

    A water resources consultant, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, argues that the Port of Seattle's July 2001 Low Flow Analysis for Sea-Tac Airport expansion fails to provide reasonable assurance that the project will meet water quality standards in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. The letter criticizes the submission as incomplete and rushed, noting missing figures, unfinished sections, and an unresolved plan to store the required 46 acre-feet of stormwater across the three watersheds. The consultant contends that the Port's proposed water quality protections—including filtration, aeration, and biofiltration swales—are unproven, inadequately designed, and fall short of the regulatory standard required for Section 401/404 permit approval.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH AR023128: Letter from Columbia Biological Assessments to Army Corps of Engineers and Ecology re Port Of Seattle Low Flow Analysis/Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal

    A biological scientist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition reviewed the Port of Seattle's plan to store airport stormwater in detention vaults and release it into Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks during summer low-flow periods. The review found that the plan could worsen water quality in those creeks, because stored sediments may release toxic levels of copper and zinc, and potentially harbor human pathogens from airplane wastewater. The scientist concluded that regulators lacked sufficient information to approve the proposal without further testing, modeling, and independent scientific review.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-06

    EXH 353: ACC Comment Letter Low Flow Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (§404 Permit, STIA)

    A August 6, 2001 letter from Water Resources Consulting L.L.C. on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition critiques the Port of Seattle's 'Low Flow Analysis - Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal' submitted in support of its Section 404/401 permit application for SeaTac Airport expansion. The letter argues that the Port's plan fails to provide reasonable assurance that the airport's stormwater management will meet water quality standards in Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek. Key concerns include an incomplete and unfinished proposal, insufficient stormwater storage capacity, unproven water quality treatment methods, and reliance on vague future 'adaptive management' rather than concrete, enforceable designs.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-05

    EXH AR018284: Ecology Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for Third Runway at STIA — Revised Draft and Attachments

    Email from Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 5, 2001, distributing a revised Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the construction of a Third Runway and related projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) in the Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creek watersheds and wetlands in SeaTac and Auburn, King County, Washington. The
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-05

    EXH AR017930: Ecology Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for Third Runway at STIA — Internal Review Email and Draft Letter

    Email from Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 5, 2001, circulating a revised Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the Port Of Seattle’s Third Runway construction at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Recipients include Gordon White, Raymond Hellwig, Erik Stockdale, Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Dave Garland, Ching-Pi Wang, Katie Walter, Kelly Whiting, Joan
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR018276: Draft 401 Conditions for Port Of Seattle NRMP Auburn Mitigation Site — Memorandum from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny

    Deliberative memorandum dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, Inc.) to Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology), transmitting revised draft 401 conditions for the Port Of Seattle Natural Resources Mitigation Plan (NRMP) Auburn Mitigation Site. Document 21-1-12020-001-M1 REVISED.doc covers Auburn Mitigation Site revisions including culvert placement issues on June 28, 2001
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR018283: Email from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny Regarding Fish/Stream Monitoring Plan

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, regarding fish and stream monitoring recommendations for Port Of Seattle mitigation area. Discusses IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology limitations and augmentation with monitoring of temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality, large woody debris, riparian canopy cover, and fish use.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR017264: Email Chain RE: Deliberative Draft 401 WQC for Third Runway — Drabek to Kenny

    Email chain between John Drabek and Ann Kenny (Washington State Department of Ecology) dated August 3, 2001, regarding a preliminary deliberative draft Section 401 Water Quality Certification (WQC) for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway. Drabek raises question about RCW 90.48 required AKART implementation in NPDES permit reissuances and integration with the 401. Kenny’s original email
    TagsACC, Ecology, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR024388: King County Review Comments Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources submitted a technical review letter to the Washington Department of Ecology evaluating the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed offset facilities for stormwater management near Sea-Tac Airport. The review found the proposal goes well beyond the basic requirements of the King County Surface Water Design Manual and represents substantial mitigation for low flow impacts in affected drainage basins, including Miller and Walker Creeks. Reviewers noted several inconsistencies and data gaps in the documentation and recommended that a final consolidated document be prepared incorporating all corrections and technical memoranda.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-03

    Exhibit 2212: Email on Fish/Stream Monitoring Conditions for Port Of Seattle Mitigation

    Email dated August 3, 2001 from Katie Walter (Shannon & Wilson, KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, cc Erik Stockdale, subject fish/stream monitoring. References Richard Brocksmith (fish biologist) and IBI (Index of Biotic Integrity) methodology for stream health monitoring. Proposes monitoring condition language for Port Of Seattle requiring monitoring plan covering temperature, turbidity, channel morphology, substrate quality,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Highline Forum agenda: South King County Community Impact Fund update and Port noise program update" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V