Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEnvironmental Impact Statement(400)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • SEPA comment cummulative ops final pdf
    2026-06-13

    SEPA Comment: Aircraft Noise Cumulative Exposure Analysis – Sea-Tac Airport SAMP SEPA DEIS

    SEPA public comment filed by Jeff Bogen, Des Moines, WA resident and member of the Des Moines Airport Advisory Committee, regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA) Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) SEPA Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS). The comment presents event-based analysis of aircraft noise exposure using Sound Exposure Level (SEL) records from Port Of
    TagsDes Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, Noise Monitors, SAMP, SEPA
  • Https3a2f2fcloudfront us east 1.images.arcpublishing.com2fcmg2fohqcp4oj55fw3i5b3ejfg2lfx4
    2026-06-08

    KIRO7: Public weighs in on Port of Seattle Sustainable Airport Master Plan

    It’s no secret that the Puget Sound region is growing. To keep up with the increasing demands, The Port of Seattle created the Sustainable Airport Master Plan, a blueprint for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport to address the increasing volume of passengers and cargo. The public can now comment on the draft environmental impact statement, available here.
    CategoriesFrom The Web, News Stories TagsCity of Burien, community engagement, Des Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, KIRO7, Noise, Sustainable Airport Master Plan
  • Item report 1 pdf
    2026-06-04

    Des Moines City Council – SAMP Update

    Purpose and Recommendation To provide the Council with an update on the status of the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) environmental review. Background Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Approval On September 26, 2025, the FAA completed their National Environmental Policy Act review and approved a Final Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact/Record of Decision
    CategoriesEvents TagsCity Of Des Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Port Of Seattle, SAMP Draft SEPA EIS
  • Item report 1 pdf
    2026-06-04

    Des Moines City Council (SAMP) update

    The City of Des Moines, WA provided its City Council with an update on the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, following the FAA's September 2025 approval of 31 near-term expansion projects — including 19 new gates, a second terminal, and cargo facilities. The Port of Seattle launched a state-level environmental review (SEPA) in May 2026, releasing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement with a 60-day public comment period. Des Moines is collaborating with the cities of Burien and SeaTac through an Interlocal Agreement to submit coordinated comments, with the final report expected in 2027.
    TagsCity Of Des Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Port Of Seattle, SAMP
  • 2026-06-04

    Des Moines City Council (SAMP) update

    The City of Des Moines, WA provided its City Council with an update on the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, following the FAA's September 2025 approval of 31 near-term expansion projects — including 19 new gates, a second terminal, and cargo facilities. The Port of Seattle launched a state-level environmental review (SEPA) in May 2026, releasing a Draft Environmental Impact Statement with a 60-day public comment period. Des Moines is collaborating with the cities of Burien and SeaTac through an Interlocal Agreement to submit coordinated comments, with the final report expected in 2027.
    TagsCity Of Des Moines, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Port Of Seattle, SAMP Draft SEPA EIS
  • Burien des moines seatac draft port letter pdf
    2026-06-01

    (Draft) Joint letter from City of Burien, City of Des Moines, and City of SeaTac to Port Of Seattle Commissioners regarding SAMP environmental review

    The mayors of Burien, Des Moines, and SeaTac jointly wrote to Port of Seattle Commissioners in 2026 to challenge the claim that airport expansion projects outlined in the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) would have no significant impact on neighboring communities. The letter highlights concerns about aircraft noise, air pollution, traffic, and disproportionate burdens on historically disadvantaged residents living closest to the airport. The cities also demand that the public comment period for the Draft Environmental Impact Statement be extended from 60 to at least 120 days to allow for meaningful community review.
    TagsCity of Burien, City Of Des Moines, City Of SeaTac, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP
  • SEPA noise legal challenge support pdf
    2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: SAMP SEPA Draft EIS Noise Analysis Deficiency — Inadequate Metric and Health Impact Assessment

    Formal SEPA comment filed 2026-05-28 by Jeffrey Bogen, Des Moines resident, challenging the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Draft Environmental Impact Statement noise analysis as legally insufficient under WAC 197-11-794. Argues the Port Of Seattle improperly imported the FAA’s 1.5 dB/65 DNL significance threshold wholesale from NEPA, substituting it for Washington’s required multi-factor significance standard covering magnitude,
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Noise, SAMP, SEPA, WAC
  • Technical appendix – sea airport capacity analysis pdf
    2026-05-28

    Technical Appendix: SEA Airport Capacity Analysis — Supporting Documentation for Capacity White Papers

    Technical appendix prepared by Jeffery Bogen (DAAC) dated May 28, 2026, supporting SAMP Seating Capacity SEPA/EIS Comment for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (SEA / KSEA). Document covers FAA 2016 baseline hourly flow rates, observed hourly throughput 2024–2026, current capacity improvements at SEA, annual operations translation methodology, scenario definitions, and constrained vs. unconstrained operations projections through 2037
    TagsCapacity, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Cumulative Health Effects Missing in SAMP EIS

    Des Moines resident Jeffrey Bogen submitted a formal comment arguing that the Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement fails to adequately analyze cumulative health effects on nearby communities. He contends that the EIS must go beyond examining individual pollution sources and instead assess the combined burden of aircraft ultrafine particles, roadway traffic emissions, chronic noise, and other stressors together, since scientific research shows these exposures interact and compound one another. Bogen calls for a comprehensive cumulative-risk framework, backed by ten peer-reviewed studies, to be incorporated into the EIS before any accurate public health or policy conclusions can be drawn.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, SAMP, SEPA, UFP, Ultrafine Particulates
  • 2026-05-28

    Formal Comment by Jeffrey Bogen: Aircraft Seat Capacity Estimates and Fleet Upgauging in the Seattle-Area Metroplex (SAMP) Environmental Impact Statement

    A Des Moines resident's formal comment on the Seattle-Area Metroplex Environmental Impact Statement argues that Sea-Tac Airport's official planning assumption — that average aircraft size will grow by only 0.5% per year — is mathematically incompatible with the airport's own goal of 56 million annual passengers by 2032. The comment shows that reaching that passenger target under the current assumption would require roughly 880,000 flights per year, far exceeding the airport's infrastructure ceiling of about 517,000 operations. The author contends that airlines like Alaska and Delta are already ordering larger aircraft and expanding international routes at Sea-Tac, meaning faster fleet upgauging is not a worst-case scenario but a necessity for the plan to make sense.
    TagsAlaska Air, Delta, Environmental Impact Statement, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 … Page 40
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Passenger Growth – Port Of Seattle Commission Regular Meeting P69" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V