Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(797)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-09-16

    EXH AR000355: Declaration of Roger Pearce Supporting Port Of Seattle’s Application for Direct Review and Request for Certificate of Appealability

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney at Foster Pepper & Shefelman PLLC, supporting Port Of Seattle’s application for direct review and request for certificate of appealability in King County Superior Court Case No. 02-2-25658-9 SEA before Hon. Bruce Hilyer. Filed against the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-01

    PCHB 01-160: Transmittal Letter — Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle (Petition for Review Filed)

    In September 2002, the Pollution Control Hearings Board clerk notified all legal parties that Respondents (Washington State Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle) filed a Petition for Review in King County Superior Court in the case Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology & Port of Seattle. The clerk also transmitted the entire PCHB case file to the King County Superior Court as part of the transfer of proceedings. This case, bearing PCHB docket number 01-160, relates to environmental and land-use disputes surrounding Sea-Tac Airport expansion.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-01

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting Certificate of Appealability — ACC & CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Certificate of Appealability in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and William H. Lynch granted direct appellate review requests filed by both ACC/CASE (Thurston
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-09-01

    PCHB Doc 7: Order Granting Certificate of Appealability — ACC & CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB 01-160

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Certificate of Appealability in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Board members Kaleen Cottingham, Robert V. Jensen, and William H. Lynch granted direct review requests by both ACC/CASE and Port Of Seattle to the Court of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-08-20

    EXH AR033654: Fax Cover Sheet and WQP Policy 1-22 — Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts

    Fax dated 8/20/02 from Sandra Manning (Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program) to Tom Young transmitting a signed stormwater agreement. Includes WQP Policy 1-22 (effective July 15, 2001), titled ‘Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts for the Water Quality
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, WAC, Water Quality
  • 2002-08-12

    Chronology of Section 401 permit, second application

    This document chronicles the Port of Seattle's second Section 401 Clean Water Act permit application, submitted in September 1999, which was on the verge of being denied by the Washington State Department of Ecology due to multiple shortcomings related to wetlands and water quality. On September 28, 2000, a private, unannounced meeting was held between Port, Ecology, and Governor's office officials, after which the Port strategically withdrew its application to avoid a formal denial. A series of closed-door negotiating sessions followed in October 2000, none of which were publicly announced, raising concerns about political influence and lack of transparency in the permitting process for Sea-Tac Airport expansion.
    TagsClean Water Act, Ecology, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Stormwater
  • 2002-07-24

    EXH AR000913: ACC Notice of Supplemental Authority — PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) file a Notice of Supplemental Authority in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board, citing two Washington State Supreme Court decisions issued July 18, 2002: Public Utility District No. 1 of Pend Oreille County v. Washington Department of Ecology (Docket No.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Supreme Court Of Washington
  • 2002-06-11

    PCHB 01-160: Order Correcting the Earlier Order Publishing Certain Portions of Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 order dated June 11, 2002, correcting the April 22, 2002 order publishing deposition excerpts. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appellant, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) intervenor, versus Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle respondents. Board presided by Kaleen Cottingham denied reconsideration of deposition portions excluded on relevancy
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-06-07

    PCHB Doc 923: ACC Reply in Support of Motion for Correction, Clarification, and/or Partial Reconsideration of Order Publishing Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses

    ACC’s reply brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in support of its motion for correction, clarification, and/or partial reconsideration of the Board’s April 22 Order publishing certain portions of depositions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses. ACC argues against Port Of Seattle’s opposition, contending the motion is timely,
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-06-03

    EXH AR001008: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Correction, Clarification and Reconsideration of Board’s Decision Publishing Portions of Depositions

    Port Of Seattle response filed in PCHB case No. 01-160 opposing ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion motion for correction, clarification, and reconsideration of the Pollution Control Hearings Board’s prior order publishing deposition portions of Ecology managers and CR 30(b)(6) designated witnesses (Erik Stockdale, Hellwig, Tom Luster). Port argues motion is untimely
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 … Page 80
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "part-150-for-dummies" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V