Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCEQ(27)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2025-09-01

    Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Environmental Assessment for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects: Chapter 5, Cumulative Impacts

    The Final Environmental Assessment for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Sustainable Airport Master Plan near-term projects explains that cumulative impact analysis has been removed from the document. This change reflects recent legal developments, including the revocation of CEQ regulations implementing NEPA and a May 2025 Supreme Court ruling, which together mean federal agencies are no longer required to assess the combined environmental effects of separate but related projects. As a result, the section that previously contained cumulative impacts data and analysis is now absent from this final report.
    TagsCEQ, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2025-09-01

    Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Environmental Assessment for the Sustainable Airport Master Plan Near-Term Projects: Chapter 5, Cumulative Impacts

    Final Environmental Assessment (EA) Chapter 5 on Cumulative Impacts for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP) near-term projects, dated September 2025. Explains that cumulative impact analysis has been removed from the Final EA due to: CEQ revocation of 40 CFR parts 1500-1508 implementing NEPA (42 USC 4321) pursuant to EO 14154 (Unleashing
    TagsCEQ, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2025-05-29

    Seven County Infrastructure Coalition et al. v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May 2025 that federal agencies have broad discretion in determining the scope of environmental reviews required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The case involved a proposed 88-mile railroad in Utah, where the Court held that agencies do not need to analyze the environmental effects of separate upstream or downstream projects — such as oil drilling or refining — when reviewing a specific infrastructure project. Courts must give substantial deference to agency decisions about what to include in environmental impact statements, rather than imposing their own judgment about what details are required.
    TagsCEQ, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Railroads, Supreme Court
  • 2025-05-29

    Seven County Infrastructure Coalition et al. v. Eagle County, Colorado, et al.

    The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in May 2025 that federal agencies have broad discretion in determining the scope of environmental reviews required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The case involved a proposed 88-mile railroad in Utah, where the Court held that agencies do not need to analyze the environmental effects of separate upstream or downstream projects — such as oil drilling or refining — when reviewing a specific infrastructure project. Courts must give substantial deference to agency decisions about what to include in environmental impact statements, rather than imposing their own judgment about what details are required.
    TagsCEQ, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Railroads, Supreme Court
  • 2025-02-25

    KK Law Alert: Agencies Instructed to Continue NEPA Analysis as Usual as Regulatory Landscape Shifts

    On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued Executive Order 14154, Unleashing American Energy, which directed the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to propose rescinding CEQ’s NEPA regulations and to instead provide guidance on implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Executive Order 14154 also explicitly revoked the 1977 Carter Administration’s Executive Order 11191 which directed CEQ
    CategoriesFrom The Web, News Stories TagsCEQ, Kaplan Kirsch Rockwell
  • 2025-02-24

    Trump Administration Environmental-Justice-Related Executive Orders: Potential Implications for EPA Programs

    Download PDF (415KB) | PDF Version History IF12922.5 In January 2025, President Trump issued executive orders (E.O.s) that revoked prior E.O.s, including E.O.s related to environmental justice. Another Trump Administration E.O. directed federal agencies to close environmental justice offices and cease environmental-justice-related programs. These three E.O.s could affect environmental-justice-related programs and activities administered by the
    CategoriesFrom The Web TagsCEQ, Congress.gov, Environmental Justice, EPA, Executive Orders
  • 2025-02-24

    Trump administration environmental-justice-related executive orders: potential implications for EPA programs

    This Congressional Research Service report explains how President Trump's 2025 executive orders revoked earlier Clinton and Biden administration environmental justice policies and directed federal agencies, including the EPA, to close environmental justice offices and end related programs. The report outlines which specific EPA programs and activities may be affected, such as grant programs, screening tools, and interagency councils. It also notes that while the executive orders change agency priorities, they do not override existing federal pollution control laws that Congress has established.
    TagsCEQ, Congressional Research Service, Environmental Justice, EPA, Executive Orders
  • If12922.5 Pdf
    2025-02-24

    Trump administration environmental-justice-related executive orders: potential implications for EPA programs

    This Congressional Research Service report explains how President Trump's 2025 executive orders revoked earlier Clinton and Biden administration environmental justice policies and directed federal agencies, including the EPA, to close environmental justice offices and end related programs. The report outlines which specific EPA programs and activities may be affected, such as grant programs, screening tools, and interagency councils. It also notes that while the executive orders change agency priorities, they do not override existing federal pollution control laws that Congress has established.
    TagsCEQ, Congressional Research Service, Environmental Justice, EPA, Executive Orders
  • 2024-10-01

    Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Environmental Assessment for the SAMP Near-Term Projects: Chapter 5 — Cumulative Impacts

    This section of the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Environmental Assessment examines cumulative impacts from past, present, and reasonably foreseeable future development projects at and around SEA airport, covering the period from 2017 through 2032. It reviews actions by the Port of Seattle and surrounding cities and agencies — including hotel construction, terminal expansions, and flight procedure changes — to assess how their combined environmental effects, such as noise, emissions, and land use changes, may affect nearby communities. Projects beyond 2032 or those in the long-term vision phase are excluded from detailed analysis due to insufficient specificity.
    TagsCEQ, environmental assessment, Landrum & Brown, NEPA, SAMP, Sustainable Airport Master Plan
  • 2024-06-06

    Council on Environmental Quality Substantially Rewrites NEPA Regulations

    In May 2024, the Council on Environmental Quality published major updates to the rules governing how federal agencies must review environmental impacts of projects, affecting everything from public participation to project timelines. The changes place new emphasis on environmental justice, requiring agencies to meaningfully engage communities facing disproportionate environmental burdens, and remove previous rules that limited who could challenge agency decisions in court. While some updates are designed to speed up the review process, others may add new requirements for agencies and project sponsors seeking federal permits or funding.
    TagsCEQ, Council on Environmental Quality, Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Justice, NEPA

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Air Quality Monitoring Equipment Training Group Photo" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V