Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagArmy Corp of Engineers(124)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-09-02

    EXH AR041825: FAA Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regarding Port Of Seattle Third Runway Wetland Mitigation

    FAA Northwest Mountain Region letter dated September 2, 1998, from FAA to Brian R. Applebury, Chief Operations Division, Seattle District Corps of Engineers, regarding permit application 96-4-02325 for Port Of Seattle Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Letter addresses compensatory wetland mitigation, bird/aircraft strike hazard, Advisory Circular AC 150/5200-33 ‘Hazardous Wildlife Attractants on or Near
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, FAA, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 1998-04-20

    EXH AR035981: Comment Binder B — Letters to the Corps and Ecology During Second Public Comment Period (April–April 1998)

    Port of Seattle Comment Binder B for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update, containing letters submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the second public comment period (April 9–20, 1998) and comments to Washington State Department of Ecology during the entire public comment period (December 19, 1997–April 29, 1998). Includes a letter dated
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 1998-04-15

    EXH AR041627: USDA APHIS Animal Damage Control Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Opposing New Wetlands Within 10,000 Feet of Sea-Tac Airport Runways

    Letter dated April 15, 1998 from J. Gary Oldenburg, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Animal Damage Control, State Director WA/AK/HI/Pacific Islands, to Jonathan Friedman, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, follow-up to public hearing of April 9, 1998. Strongly opposes establishment of any new wetlands within 10,000 feet of runways at
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Safety, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1998-04-09

    EXH AR041625: Letter from USDA Wildlife Services to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regarding Wetland Mitigation at Sea-Tac Airport

    April 9, 1998 letter from Gary Oldenburg, USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Wildlife Services State Director for WA/AK/HI/Pacific Islands, to Jonathan Friedman, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, regarding wildlife hazards at Sea-Tac Airport. Argues that wetland mitigation measures at SeaTac Airport should be conducted off-site, citing FAA Advisory Circular 150/5200-33
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, FAA, Part 139, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1998-04-09

    EXH AR024336: Fisheries Consultants Letter to Army Corps – STIA Third Runway Aquatic Habitat & Fish Impacts, Miller Creek

    A 1998 letter from Fisheries Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concludes that SeaTac Airport's proposed Third Runway will have an overall neutral effect on aquatic habitat and fish populations in Miller Creek. Minor benefits are expected from new storm flow detention facilities, which will reduce peak flood flows by 5–20%, and from a planned 100-foot-wide stream buffer created through residential buyouts along the creek. Adverse impacts are limited to the temporary disruption of a quarter-mile creek relocation and an approximate 8% reduction in late-summer low stream flows due to increased paved surfaces and wetland fill.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, EIS, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 1998-04-09

    EXH AR035307: Comment Binder A — Third Runway Corps/Ecology Public Comments, December 1997–April 1998

    Comment Binder A compiled by Port of Seattle for Sea-Tac Airport (Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) third runway project, containing letters submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the initial comment period (December 19, 1997 to January 20, 1998) and comments from the joint Corps/Ecology public hearing held April 9, 1998. Includes a January 15,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 1997-12-19

    EXH AR041401: US Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice of Application for Permit — Port Of Seattle Third Runway, Sea-Tac Airport

    US Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District public notice of permit application 96-4-02325, filed by Port Of Seattle (contact: Barbara Hinkle, (206) 439-6606) under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. Proposes filling 7.38 acres of wetlands to construct an 8,500-foot parallel third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), plus 2.34 acres for Runway
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 1997-09-12

    EXH AR023208: Sediment Characterization Hamm Creek Restoration Project Duwamish Turning Basin

    This 1997 report by Science Applications International Corporation characterizes sediment quality in the Duwamish Turning Basin near Seattle, Washington, as part of the Hamm Creek Restoration Project. It presents results from chemical testing, biological bioassays, and sediment sampling to evaluate contaminant levels and compare them against sediment management standards. The study was prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Duwamish River, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Seattle
  • 1996-12-18

    Exhibit 208: Port Of Seattle Section 404 Application Letter — Third Runway Master Plan Update Wetland Fill, Sea-Tac Airport

    In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material into wetlands at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport as part of its Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The proposed runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing runways, was intended to address severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which reduced airport capacity from 60 to as few as 24 arrivals per hour roughly 44% of the year. The application was the result of nearly a decade of regional planning, environmental review, and public involvement, including studies confirming that no feasible supplemental airport sites existed in the four-county region.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Barbara Hinkle, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 1996-12-18

    Section 404 Permit Application: Port Of Seattle to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Fill Material

    In December 1996, the Port of Seattle submitted a Section 404 permit application to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to place fill material in waters of the United States as part of Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan Update, which included construction of a third parallel runway. The application explains that the new runway, located 2,500 feet west of the existing 16R/34L runway, was needed to reduce severe arrival delays during poor weather conditions, which were costing airlines approximately $42 million annually. The project was the outcome of nearly a decade of regional planning, including the PSRC's Flight Plan Study, which evaluated numerous alternatives before recommending the runway expansion as the best solution for the region's long-term air travel needs.
    TagsArmy Corp of Engineers, Barbara Hinkle, Permitting, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Chapter 3 Affected Environment_63" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V