TagACC(1531)

Third Pre-Hearing Order issued by the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Issued following a March 6, 2002 pre-hearing conference presided over by Kaleen Cottingham with Board member Bill Lynch and

Pre-filed testimony of Sally Nelson, Burien City Council member and former Mayor, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle. Testimony introduces ACC — an interlocal agreement entity comprising Cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila,

This document examines the geotechnical effects of the February 28, 2001 Nisqually earthquake on earth structures in the Olympia, South Seattle, and Tacoma, Washington area. It covers damage observations including landslides along Highway 101, failures of road and railroad embankments, performance of mechanically stabilized earth retaining walls, and the condition of solid waste landfills following the quake. One notable slide near the State Road 8 junction involved a 15-20 meter high embankment that collapsed and sent debris flowing approximately 150 meters downslope.

Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Marten Brown Inc. withdraws as counsel for Respondent Port Of Seattle and is replaced by Brown Reavis & Manning PLLC, with Gillis E. Reavis (WSBA #21451) signing for both

This document contains legal discovery materials from a Pollution Control Hearings Board case in Washington State, in which the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) challenged the Port of Seattle and the Washington Department of Ecology over the Sea-Tac Third Runway Project. The Port of Seattle submitted interrogatories asking ACC to identify its expert witnesses and their prior testimony histories, to which ACC objected as overbroad and burdensome. Expert witnesses from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, including Bill Rozeboom and Malcolm Leytham, are listed along with their prior cases involving stormwater and water quality issues relevant to the runway project.

Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion

Draft figure (AR 037219) prepared by Parametrix, Inc. on March 5, 2002, mapping wetlands near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (northern section) at scale 1:2400. Shows surveyed wetland boundaries, estimated wetland boundaries, other estimated or unverified wetlands outside project area, parcel boundaries, temporary impacts, and permanent impacts. Elevation points marked at 335.5, 335.3, 324.4. Administrative Record number

AR037220 draft wetland map (Figure 2, Southern Map) prepared by Parametrix, Inc., dated March 05, 2002, depicting wetlands near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Map shows surveyed wetland boundaries, estimated wetland boundaries, SASA boundaries, temporary and permanent impact boundaries, and wetlands outside project area at scale 1:2400. Includes elevation data points and wetland delineation markers across the

Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster responds to Ecology’s Motion in Limine seeking to strike portions of his pre-filed testimony on grounds he is serving as an expert witness. Luster asserts

Letter dated March 4, 2002 from Peter Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and Port of Seattle) regarding use of a chess clock format during hearing proceedings. Letter argues for a per-side rather than per-party chess clock