Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH AR003201: Erratum to Respondent Port Of Seattle’s List of Witnesses and Exhibits

    Erratum filed by Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) correcting Item No. 136 in the witness and exhibit list. Corrects dates for Parametrix, Inc. draft memorandum to Port Of Seattle project files titled ‘Range-finding water-effect ratio results’ (authors L. Logan and D.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc AR003205: Port Of Seattle Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum supporting its motion for partial summary judgment on Issue No. 14 (‘Did Ecology and the Port comply with SEPA?’) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) lacks
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-25

    PCHB Doc 3214: Declaration of Roger A. Pearce Supporting Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for Port Of Seattle, filed February 25, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue. Identifies and authenticates three exhibits from the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SEPA
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH 458: Review Comments Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, Dec 2001

    This February 2002 draft document from King County Department of Natural Resources presents technical review comments on the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review identifies several deficiencies in the hydrologic modeling for Walker Creek and Miller Creek, including inconsistencies in impervious area calculations, questionable vault-filling timelines, and concerns about the accuracy of observed streamflow data used for calibration. King County recommends additional refinements before approving the revised impact numbers, and suggests that Ecology and the Port establish a formal compliance oversight process.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-23

    EXH AR034844: King County Review Comments on Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, December 2001

    King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-22

    PCHB 01-160: Pre-Filed Testimony of William Rozeboom, Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand on Behalf of ACC

    Pre-filed testimony of William Rozeboom P.E., Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002, Binder #3 of 4. Document received by Environmental Hearings Office. The index references testimony of
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR014595: Pre-Filed Testimony of William A. Rozeboom on Behalf of ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of William A. Rozeboom, professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port Of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Rozeboom testifies regarding stormwater facilities, streamflow impacts, drainage plans, post-construction monitoring, and stormwater management plans related
    TagsACC, CASE, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR014751: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dyanne Sheldon on Behalf of ACC — PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed testimony of Dyanne Sheldon, environmental scientist and wetland ecologist, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Testimony addresses discrepancies in Ecology’s regulatory authority over wetlands, restoration/creation credits, wetland function assessment, 401 permit conditions,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water Quality
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR015049: Pre-Filed Testimony of Dr. John Strand on Behalf of ACC, PCHB No. 01-160

    Pre-filed written testimony of Dr. John Strand, Ph.D. (Principal Biologist, Columbia Biological Assessments; Adjunct Professor, Washington State University Tri-Cities), submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Strand’s testimony covers ecological risk assessment of stormwater
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater
  • 2002-02-22

    EXH AR003520: Certificate of Service — ACC and CASE Prefiled Testimony with Exhibits, PCHB No. 01-160

    Certificate of Service filed February 22, 2002 by Rachel Parks, employee of Helsell Fetterman LLP, attorneys for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), in PCHB Case No. 01-160. Certifies hand-delivery by special messenger of ACC’s and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) prefiled testimony with exhibits of witnesses Amanda Azous, Dyanne Sheldon, John Strand, Peter Willing, Thomas Luster,
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Elon Musk email on remote work policy" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V