Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1524)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-11

    Analytical Resources Incorporated Laboratory Analysis Report – Case 2

    A laboratory analysis report from Analytical Resources, Inc. to Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. regarding four water samples accepted on January 31, 2002 for Case 2. The report notes that metals and conventionals analysis proceeded without incident, but glycol analysis required re-analysis outside holding time due to calibration issues, with both data
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-11

    Leytham Exhibit 222: Flow Rate vs. Time Infiltration Capacity Graph

    A hand-drawn graph showing flow rate over time with three curves: minute, hourly, and infiltration capacity. The diagram illustrates the relationship between flow rates at different time scales and infiltration capacity, with a hatched area indicating excess flow above infiltration capacity. This appears to be a hydrological sketch used as a legal exhibit.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Stipulation and agreed order modifying due dates for joint status report and for providing board with estimate of time needed for hearing

    A stipulation and agreed order filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington in PCHB No. 01-160, involving the Airport Communities Coalition, the Department of Ecology, and the Port of Seattle. The document requests extensions of deadlines for filing a Joint Status Report and providing an estimate of hearing time, both
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issue

    The Port of Seattle filed a motion for partial summary judgment before the Pollution Control Hearings Board seeking dismissal of Agreed Issue No. 14 regarding SEPA compliance. The Port argues the Board lacks jurisdiction to hear the Airport Communities Coalition’s claims that environmental impact statements for the Master Plan Update were legally inadequate and that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Declaration of Michael Feldman supporting Port Of Seattle’s motion for partial summary judgment on SEPA issue

    Michael Feldman, Director of Aviation Facilities and Environmental Programs at the Port of Seattle, declares facts supporting the Port’s motion for partial summary judgment in PCHB Case No. 01-160. The declaration summarizes the history of environmental review for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update, including the FEIS, SEIS, FAA Record of Decision, and subsequent
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Turbidity Data from Sea-Tac Site Visit

    An email from Peter Willing to John Strand reporting turbidity measurements taken during a Sea-Tac site visit on January 28, 2002. Two samples were recorded: tank farm outfall readings of 281 NTU and 299 NTU, compared to DM Cr (Des Moines Creek) readings of 31 NTU and 31.2 NTU. The document includes full email headers.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-08

    Letter from Marten Brown to Kevin L. Stock Re: ACC and CASE v. Port Of Seattle and Department of Ecology Reference Documents

    A letter from Gillis E. Reavis of Marten Brown attorneys to Kevin L. Stock of Helsell Fetterman enclosing two spreadsheets listing reference documents relied on by expert John Strunk in PCHB No. 01-160. The spreadsheets list documents related to preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport, including studies
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-07

    Comments on Recently Received Documents Pertaining to Seattle Tacoma International Airport Project Third Runway – Low Flow Analysis

    GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), submitted technical comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Low Flow Analysis for the Third Runway Expansion Project. The letter identifies critical deficiencies in the Port’s analysis, including failure to account for initial years of water flow lag through the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-06

    Denial of summary judgment – Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    The Pollution Control Hearings Board denied a motion for summary judgment filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) regarding whether the Port of Seattle was required to obtain a water right to implement low stream flow conditions in its §401 certification for the Third Runway expansion. The two-member Board reached contrary positions on the motion,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-06

    Letter Transmitting Field Notes of Peter Willing and Bill Rozeboom – January 28, 2002 Site Visit

    A cover letter from Helsell Fetterman LLP attorney Peter J. Eglick to Roger A. Pearce of Foster Pepper & Shefelman, transmitting field notes from a January 28, 2002 site visit by Peter Willing and Bill Rozeboom. The letter relates to the case Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Attached
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 … Page 153
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Declaration of Michael P. Witek in support of appellants’ motion to publish depositions of Ecology managers and CR30(b)(6) designated witnesses" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V