Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-03-02

    EXH AR021820: GeoSyntec Correction Comment #7 Pseudo-Static Seismic Stability Third Runway Wall ACC Technical Review

    In March 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a correction to a technical review letter concerning the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, clarifying that the seismic stability analysis used by Hart Crowser may seriously overestimate—not underestimate—the wall's ability to withstand earthquake loads. The firm argued that analyzing only the failure surface with the lowest static safety factor, rather than independently searching for the critical seismic failure surface, is an incorrect methodology. GeoSyntec recommended a proper pseudo-static slope stability analysis to ensure adequate ground improvement measures are applied in the right areas.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR049873: Essential Fish Habitat Assessment — Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA

    Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and Port Of Seattle for Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), March 2001. Document AR049873 (project 556-2912-001) evaluates Pacific Coast salmon EFH — Chinook, Coho, and Puget Sound Pink salmon — in Miller Creek Basin, Des Moines Creek
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SalmonFolderBox 21
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH 308: Email Fendt to Ludwa – Specific Information Needs TESC NHC Comment 20

    In a March 2001 email exchange, Paul Fendt responds to Ken Ludwa regarding specific information requests related to TESC (Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control) facilities, calling the level of detail requested 'absurd.' The information requests from Ludwa included clearing limits, tributary areas for ESC facilities, pump sizes, power supply specifications, spill prevention plans, and the expected duration of temporary facilities. The document appears to be part of an administrative record related to construction or environmental control planning at or near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Construction, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR050023: Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package, Borrow Areas 3 and 4, Sea-Tac International Airport

    Draft Conceptual Reclamation Permit Package for Borrow Areas 3 and 4 at Sea-Tac International Airport, City of SeaTac, Washington. Prepared by Hart Crowser for Port Of Seattle for presentation to the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR), March 1, 2001, project J-4978-62. Document covers site preparation activities, mining practices, operating plan, conceptual reclamation plan, revegetation
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 21
  • 2001-02-26

    EXH AR021605: Columbia Analytical Svcs Water/Sediment Quality Monitoring Lab Results Ltr SR K2101038

    A February 2001 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services transmits water and sediment quality monitoring results to Columbia Biological Assessments in Richland, Washington, under service request K2101038. The report confirms that all analyses were conducted in accordance with the laboratory's quality assurance program, with samples received on February 12, 2001 and preliminary results faxed on February 23, 2001. The accompanying documentation includes standard data qualifier codes for inorganic, metals, and organic results used to interpret analytical findings.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-02-26

    Exhibit 2061: Ecology Dam Safety Office — MSE Wall and Stormwater Pond Dam Safety Review, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Project

    Email chain (Exhibit 2061, AR031718-AR031720) dated February 26, 2001, from Jerald LaVassar (Ecology Dam Safety Office) to Ann Kenny (Ecology), responding to Andrea Grad (Helsell law firm, representing ACC/Airport Communities Coalition). LaVassar explains why the Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall at Sea-Tac Airport’s third runway project does not qualify as a dam under WAC 173-175-020,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WACFolderBox 12
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 48: King County Letter to Ecology on Port Of Seattle Stormwater Management Plan Review for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director, King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington State Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport. The letter references
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-22

    Exhibit 2040: King County Letter to Ecology Reviewing Port Of Seattle Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Improvements

    Letter dated February 22, 2001 from Pam Bissonnette, Director of King County Department of Natural Resources, to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist at Washington State Department of Ecology (DOE) Northwest Regional Office, regarding King County’s technical review of the Port Of Seattle’s Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (SMP) for Master Plan Improvements at SeaTac International Airport.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StormwaterFolderBox 12
  • 2001-02-21

    EXH AR025289: Five-Year Project RP — Des Moines Water Quality Monitoring Program

    This February 2001 report by Herrera Environmental Consultants presents a five-year summary of water quality monitoring conducted for the City of Des Moines, Washington, covering three creek basins: Des Moines Creek, Massey Creek, and North Fork McSorley Creek. The report examines a range of water quality parameters including temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, metals, nutrients, turbidity, and fecal coliform bacteria, as well as benthic invertebrate conditions as indicators of stream health. It was prepared for the City's Surface Water Management Utility and provides data intended to inform stormwater and surface water management decisions in the Des Moines area near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH AR023092: ACC Letter to USACOE & Ecology — Scientific Adequacy Section 404 CWA Permit Third Runway

    A fisheries biologist writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition argues that the Port of Seattle has not provided sufficient scientific evidence to justify a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for its proposed third runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter contends that the project would harm local streams (Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek) and their fish populations — including federally threatened Chinook salmon — through stream relocation, contaminated fill materials, and toxic stormwater runoff containing copper, zinc, and de-icing chemicals. The author concludes that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lacks an adequate scientific basis to approve the permit without additional environmental study and mitigation measures.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third RunwayFolderBox 10

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Flight Attendant Uniform and Grooming Standards Checklist" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V