Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWAC(40)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-08-20

    EXH AR033654: Fax Cover Sheet and WQP Policy 1-22 — Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts

    Fax dated 8/20/02 from Sandra Manning (Washington State Department of Ecology, Shorelands and Environmental Assistance Program) to Tom Young transmitting a signed stormwater agreement. Includes WQP Policy 1-22 (effective July 15, 2001), titled ‘Adopting Supplemental Treatment as a Best Management Practice and Defining Compliance with Water Quality Standards for Stormwater Impacts for the Water Quality
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 13
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003187: Port Of Seattle Joinder in Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475 (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, WACFolderBox 02
  • 2002-02-13

    EXH AR021135: Increasing Hardness Effect on Freshwater Acute WQ Standards WAC 173.201A.040 — Copper & Zinc

    This document presents a technical analysis of the effect of increasing water hardness on Fresh Water Acute Water Quality Standards, referencing WAC 173.201A.040. It includes calculated values for copper and zinc acute water quality criteria at varying hardness levels (ranging from 10 to 110 mg/L), showing how the allowable concentrations change as hardness increases. The document was transmitted via fax in February 2002 from Water Resources Consulting LLC.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2002-02-13

    EXH 358: Increasing Hardness Effect on Freshwater Acute WQ Standards — Copper & Zinc, WAC 173.201A.040

    This document is a February 2002 fax from Water Resources Consulting LLC addressing the effect of increasing water hardness on fresh water acute water quality standards, referencing WAC 173.201A.040. It contains tables calculating acute water quality standards for copper and zinc at varying hardness levels in fresh water. The document appears to be part of an administrative record (AR 021262) and was transmitted between consultants, though its connection to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy is not evident from the content.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2001-12-19

    EXH AR017502: Guidance for the Use of Tables — Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and PQL Comparisons to Method B Cleanup Levels

    Ecology guidance document (AR017502, Part II of IV) explaining how to use PQL and MDL tables under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). Covers Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and comparisons to MTCA Method B cleanup levels for water and soil. Describes analytical methods from US EPA SW-846 (3000, 7000, 8000-8100, 8310,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Scientific Measurement, WACFolderBox 08
  • 2001-09-28

    EXH AR052145: Fill Criteria Derivation Chart for Third Runway Embankment

    Fill Criteria Derivation Chart (Exhibit E) for Third Runway Embankment at Sea-Tac Airport, revised 9-28-01. Charts fill dirt criteria for constituents including antimony, arsenic, barium, beryllium, chromium, copper, lead, mercury, selenium, silver, thallium, diesel, and heavy oils against Ecology criteria, FWS drainage layer cover values, and FINAL drainage layer cover values. References WAC 173-340-747(3)(a) and
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, WACFolderBox 22
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR017357: Email Chain RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Internal email chain dated June 27, 2001 from Peter Kmet (Ecology HQ/TCP) to Kevin Fitzpatrick, cc Chung K. Yee, marked ‘Deliberative Document Currently Exempt From Public Disclosure.’ Kmet recommends language for fill material criteria in the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project, including: requiring the uppermost 6 feet of fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WACFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-01

    Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation: Process for Cleanup of Hazardous Waste Sites

    This Washington State Department of Ecology fact sheet explains how the Model Toxics Control Act (Initiative 97, 1989) governs the cleanup of hazardous waste sites in Washington, outlining who is liable, how sites are identified, and the options available for conducting cleanups. Potentially liable parties — including past and present owners, operators, and those who transported or disposed of hazardous substances — may clean up sites independently or work cooperatively with Ecology through formal agreements such as consent decrees. Note: this document concerns hazardous waste site cleanup regulation and does not contain information related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsEcology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, RCW, WACFolderEcology
  • 2001-02-26

    Exhibit 2061: Ecology Dam Safety Office — MSE Wall and Stormwater Pond Dam Safety Review, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Project

    Email chain (Exhibit 2061, AR031718-AR031720) dated February 26, 2001, from Jerald LaVassar (Ecology Dam Safety Office) to Ann Kenny (Ecology), responding to Andrea Grad (Helsell law firm, representing ACC/Airport Communities Coalition). LaVassar explains why the Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall at Sea-Tac Airport’s third runway project does not qualify as a dam under WAC 173-175-020,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WACFolderBox 12
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR019613: WAC 173-340-747 Deriving Soil Concentrations Groundwater Protection MTCA

    This Washington State regulation (WAC 173-340-747) establishes methods for determining safe soil contamination levels that protect groundwater quality at cleanup sites. It outlines several scientific approaches, including three-phase and four-phase partitioning models, leaching tests, and empirical demonstrations, to calculate the maximum allowable concentration of hazardous substances in soil before they risk contaminating groundwater. The regulation requires that soil concentrations not cause groundwater cleanup level exceedances and not result in the buildup of nonaqueous phase liquids in or on groundwater.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WACFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V