Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1098)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-28

    EXH AR021057: Declaration of Restrictive Covenants — Tyee Valley Golf Course Mitigation Area

    The Port of Seattle recorded this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants to permanently protect the Tyee Valley Golf Course Mitigation Area as a natural wetland, as required by the Washington State Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in connection with the construction of Sea-Tac Airport's third runway. The declaration prohibits clearing, grading, filling, and construction within the mitigation area, with limited exceptions for approved wildlife management, monitoring, maintenance, and stormwater infrastructure. It was established to satisfy federal Clean Water Act requirements and state water quality standards by preserving and enhancing wetland and riparian habitat displaced by airport expansion.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR017499: Email Chain on Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Internal email chain dated June 27, 2001 among Peter Kmet, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung K. Yee, and others at Washington State Department of Ecology regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway Master Plan improvements. Kmet recommends against restricting fill to naturally occurring uncontaminated soils and proposes
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR023937: Email Chain — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language Draft 401 Certification STIA Third Runway

    This 2001 email chain among Washington State Department of Ecology staff discusses recommended criteria for fill material to be used in the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Staff member Peter Kmet proposed requiring fill material to meet ecological screening values from Table 749-3, with the uppermost six feet consisting of clean, naturally occurring soil free of manmade organic compounds and metals above natural background levels. The discussion also covers the applicability of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) standards and the need to address potential impacts on plants, animals, groundwater, and aquatic organisms.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR029194: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Draft Technical Meeting Notes, June 25 & 27, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meetings on June 25 and June 27, 2001, regarding Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny and John Drabek (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Paul Fendt and Tom
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR017357: Email Chain RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Internal email chain dated June 27, 2001 from Peter Kmet (Ecology HQ/TCP) to Kevin Fitzpatrick, cc Chung K. Yee, marked ‘Deliberative Document Currently Exempt From Public Disclosure.’ Kmet recommends language for fill material criteria in the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project, including: requiring the uppermost 6 feet of fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WAC
  • 2001-06-26

    EXH AR017305: Draft 401 Certification — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Third Runway Embankment, Port Of Seattle

    Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick (cc: Craig E. Thompson, Ann Kenny), dated June 26, 2001, transmitting draft clean fill criteria language for the 401 Certification related to the proposed Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport. Fill criteria based on Method A table, 3-phase model protection of ground water and surface water, PQL,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-26

    Exhibit 25: Email from Chung K. Yee re Sea-Tac Third Runway Fill Criteria for 401 Water Quality Certification

    Email dated June 26, 2001 from Chung K. Yee to Craig E. Thompson and Kevin Fitzpatrick (Ecology) transmitting draft fill criteria requirements for the 401 Water Quality Certification for the SeaTac Third Runway Embankment project. Attachments include: draft clean fill criteria, spreadsheets deriving surface water quality criteria and ground water cleanup levels using three-phase model
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-26

    Exhibit 2134 AR034353: Draft 401 Certification — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Third Runway Embankment

    Email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick, cc Craig E. Thompson and Ann Kenny, dated June 26, 2001, transmitting draft fill criteria language for a 401 Certification related to the Port Of Seattle Third Runway embankment project. Fill criteria are based on Method A table, 3-phase model protection of ground water and surface water,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-25

    EXH AR029190: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis, June 25, 2001

    Final meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway project, covering Low Flow Analysis discussions held June 25, 2001. Attendees included representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, John Drabeck), King County (Kelly Whiting), Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-25

    EXH AR026116: Memo — Modeled Area and Hydrus Model Results Draft Interim Deliverables

    A June 2001 technical memo from Pacific Groundwater Group to the Port of Seattle outlines groundwater modeling work related to the proposed Sea-Tac Airport third runway construction. The memo defines areas to be analyzed using Hydrus/Slice modeling software instead of the standard HSPF model, focusing on how new runway fill in the Miller Creek and Walker Creek basins will affect groundwater recharge. It also describes the selection of three representative hydrogeologic cross sections and methods for calculating effective recharge, accounting for runoff from impervious runway surfaces into surrounding pervious fill areas.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin Plan

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 … Page 110
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "sr509 earth zoom 1 (2)" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V