Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSalmon(34)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR019469: NMFS Biological Opinion — STIA Master Plan Update, ESA Section 7 & Essential Fish Habitat

    In May 2001, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a biological opinion concluding that planned construction and expansion projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — including a new 8,500-foot runway and other facility upgrades — were not likely to adversely affect threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon or their designated critical habitat. The review, requested by the FAA under the Endangered Species Act, examined potential impacts to nearby waterways such as Miller, Des Moines, and Gilliam creeks, as well as Essential Fish Habitat for coastal and groundfish species. NMFS concurred with the airport's own Biological Assessment, determining the projects could proceed with the mitigation measures proposed.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR050568: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter — STIA Master Plan Update Improvements, Chinook Salmon ESA Section 7 Consultation and Essential Fish Habitat

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region (Seattle, WA) to Lowell H. Johnson, FAA Airport Division Manager, concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2001-05-31

    Exhibit 2048: NMFS Biological Opinion Letter on STIA Master Plan Update Improvements — Chinook Salmon and Essential Fish Habitat Consultation

    Letter dated May 31, 2001 from NMFS Northwest Region to FAA Airport Division Manager Lowell H. Johnson (NMFS No. WSB-00-318) concurring with the ‘may affect, not likely to adversely affect’ determination for threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon (Onchorhynchus tshawytscha) and designated critical habitat under ESA Section 7(a)(2), and finding STIA projects ‘not likely to adversely
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon
  • 2001-03-01

    EXH AR049873: Essential Fish Habitat Assessment — Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA

    Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) Assessment prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and Port Of Seattle for Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA), March 2001. Document AR049873 (project 556-2912-001) evaluates Pacific Coast salmon EFH — Chinook, Coho, and Puget Sound Pink salmon — in Miller Creek Basin, Des Moines Creek
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Salmon
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH 372: Letter Columbia Biological Assessments to USACOE & Ecology — CWA §404 Permit Adequacy Third Runway

    A fisheries biologist hired by the Airport Communities Coalition argues that the Port of Seattle has not provided sufficient scientific evidence to justify a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for its proposed third runway project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report concludes that the Port's plans would harm wetlands, streams, and fish populations—including federally threatened Chinook salmon—in the Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek watersheds through contaminated fill, toxic stormwater runoff, and the rerouting of Miller Creek. The biologist urges the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to require additional environmental studies and water quality modeling before any permit decision is made.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2001-02-16

    EXH AR023092: ACC Letter to USACOE & Ecology — Scientific Adequacy Section 404 CWA Permit Third Runway

    A fisheries biologist writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition argues that the Port of Seattle has not provided sufficient scientific evidence to justify a Clean Water Act Section 404 permit for its proposed third runway expansion at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter contends that the project would harm local streams (Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek) and their fish populations — including federally threatened Chinook salmon — through stream relocation, contaminated fill materials, and toxic stormwater runoff containing copper, zinc, and de-icing chemicals. The author concludes that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers lacks an adequate scientific basis to approve the permit without additional environmental study and mitigation measures.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2000-12-01

    EXH 263: Pacific Coast Salmon Essential Fish Habitat Assessment, STIA Master Plan Update

    This December 2000 report assesses the impact of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's Master Plan Update improvements on Pacific Coast salmon Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) in nearby waterways, including Miller Creek, Des Moines Creek, and the Green River Basin. Prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and the Port of Seattle, it evaluates water quality, aquatic habitat, and hydrological effects of airport expansion on local salmon species such as Chinook, Coho, and Pink salmon. The report also outlines conservation and mitigation measures proposed to offset adverse effects on salmon habitat in the airport's surrounding watersheds.
    TagsACC, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2000-08-10

    EXH AR017903: Email from Kate Rhoads to Kelly Whiting with Comments on Copper Levels from STIA Runways

    Email dated August 10, 2000 from Kate Rhoads to Kelly Whiting transmitting a Word document (POS-Cu.doc) containing technical comments on copper (Cu) levels in stormwater runoff from Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) runways. AR017903-017904. Comments address total recoverable (TR) copper median concentration of 37 ug/l versus the dissolved fraction surface water acute toxicity standard of 4
    TagsACC, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Salmon, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2000-06-15

    EXH AR045021: FAA Letter to NMFS Transmitting Final Biological Assessment for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Letter dated June 15, 2000 from Lowell H. Johnson, Manager of FAA Northwest Mountain Region Airports Division, to Steve Landino, Branch Chief of the Washington State Branch of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), transmitting the Final Biological Assessment (FBA) for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA) development actions under ESA section 7 consultation. The FBA evaluates
    TagsACC, ESA, FAA, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-06-14

    EXH 261: Biological Assessment — Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA

    This June 2000 Biological Assessment, prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for the Federal Aviation Administration and Port of Seattle, evaluates the potential environmental impacts of proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport on federally listed species. The report examines effects on aquatic resources including Chinook salmon, bull trout, and their critical habitats within nearby waterways such as Miller Creek, Des Moines Creek, and the Green River. It was prepared to support Section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service.
    TagsACC, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Salmon, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea-Tac International Airport Hotel draft environmental impact statement" — , 1995

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V