TagPuget Sound Regional Council(191)

This archival box (Historical Box No. 1321) contains airport litigation documents from 1993–1996, including Expert Arbitration Panel audio tapes, meeting transcripts, and diskettes related to proceedings involving Treece, Shirley & Brodie. It also holds records on the FAA Grant MSA Phase II, the MSA Consultant Selection Process, Regional Airport System Plan applications for federal assistance, and materials related to the Four Post Task Force and North/Adjacent planning. The box is held on long-term loan at the WA State Archives.

This archival record (Box 1317, CID 10992) from the Port of Seattle's Administration office covers documents related to airport litigation, noise reduction, and policy from 1992 to 1996. Contents include correspondence with executive board members, legal memos on noise panel decisions, Port of Seattle resolutions, noise monitoring data, and materials sent to arbitration panel members regarding noise reduction measures at Sea-Tac Airport. The collection also contains environmental impact statements, runway litigation records, and studies on the effects of aircraft noise on nearby communities.

As of 1995, the central Puget Sound region was designated by the EPA as failing to meet federal air quality standards for three pollutants: carbon monoxide, ozone, and particulate matter. The region held 'moderate plus' status for carbon monoxide and 'marginal' status for ozone, with State Implementation Plans (SIPs) submitted to the EPA awaiting approval. Based on improving pollution levels, the region was working toward 'maintenance' status redesignation, with 10-year maintenance plans expected to be submitted to the EPA and approved by 1996.

Vision 2020: 1995 Update is a growth management, economic, and transportation strategy document produced by the Puget Sound Regional Council for the central Puget Sound region, adopted May 25, 1995. It provides regional policy guidance developed by the Council's Growth Management and Transportation Policy Boards, covering land use and transportation planning for King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap counties. Funding was provided by member jurisdictions and federal transportation agencies including the Federal Transit Administration and Federal Highway Administration.

Major Supplemental Airport Feasibility Study Summary Report dated March 23, 1995, sponsored by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), prepared by TAMS Consultants, Inc. in association with Pacific Rim Resources and Parametrix, Inc. The report covers site analysis, noise impact areas (65 Ldn contours), access analysis, instrument approach capability, local airspace evaluation, site constructability, site

This archival box (Box No. 01291, Title 1323) from the Administration office contains Airport Litigation Documents dating from 1995, prepared by Angie Daniels. The contents include memos, attachments, faxes, and condensed transcripts from Clare Impett and Jerry Dinndorf related to RCAA reports, aircraft noise group resubmittals, expert arbitration panel materials, and Sea-Tac Airport capacity plan updates and citizen correspondence. The records are classified under the Dept Subject Files series and cover key dates between April and October 1995.

Resolution EB-94-01 adopted October 27, 1994 by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Executive Board, affirming the General Assembly’s Resolution A-93-03 approving a third all-weather runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The Executive Board determined no feasible sites exist for a major supplemental airport in the four-county region and that further supplemental airport studies should not

In May 1994, the Puget Sound Regional Council announced that consultants had identified 12 potential sites for a major supplemental airport in the central Puget Sound region, narrowed down from an initial list of 25 candidates. The sites, stretching from Stanwood in the north to the Tanwax Lake area in Pierce County in the south, were deemed to have no flaws severe enough to rule them out from further consideration. The study was part of a broader effort to determine whether a supplemental airport could relieve pressure on Sea-Tac and potentially eliminate the need for a controversial third runway.