Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPuget Sound Regional Council(191)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 6153 EIS addendum pdf
    1996-05-28

    Environmental Impact Statement Addendum To: The Flight Plan Project Final EIS (1992) and the Proposed Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Final EIS (1996)

    Puget Sound Regional Council EIS addendum dated May 28, 1996, serving as a SEPA addendum to the Flight Plan Project Final EIS (1992) and the Master Plan Update Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Final EIS (1996). The document concerns a proposed amendment to the Aviation Program and Appendix P – Resolution A-93-03 of the
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac Airport, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderPRR-2026-07-30
  • 1996-04-25

    Puget Sound Regional Council Executive Board Meeting Agenda – April 25, 1996

    The Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) held an Executive Board Meeting on April 25, 1996, at the Olympic Room, Seattle Center, beginning at 9:00 A.M. A key agenda item was a communications packet regarding an Expert Arbitration Panel's decision on airport noise and demand/system management issues, with follow-up action on noise also listed under New Business. The meeting covered additional regional transportation matters, including certification of local comprehensive plan transportation elements and amendments to the 1996–98 Transportation Improvement Program (TIP).
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Noise, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, transportationFolder07-Executive Board-General Assembly-Amendment MTP
  • Ebagenda19960425 pdf
    1996-04-25

    Puget Sound Regional Council Executive Board Meeting Agenda – April 25, 1996

    Agenda for the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Executive Board meeting held April 25, 1996, at 9:00 A.M. in the Olympic Room, Seattle Center, Seattle, WA. Presided over by Executive Doug Sutherland, President. Agenda includes citizen comments, communications regarding Expert Arbitration Panel decision on noise and demand/system management, consent agenda items including approval of minutes
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Noise, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, transportationFolder07-Executive Board-General Assembly-Amendment MTP
  • 1996-03-27

    PSRC Expert Arbitration Panel Final decision on noise issues

    The Expert Arbitration Panel on Noise and Demand/System Management Issues issued its final decision on noise issues related to Resolution A-93-03, which set noise reduction conditions for PSRC authorization of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. A majority of the Panel found that the Port of Seattle had not demonstrated a sufficient reduction in
    CategoriesHistory TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Port Of Seattle, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third RunwayFolderThird Runway
  • 1996-03-27

    Expert panel says noise conditions not satisfied at Sea-Tac

    In March 1996, an independent expert panel concluded by a 2-1 vote that the Port of Seattle had not done enough to reduce real-world noise impacts from Sea-Tac Airport to meet the conditions set by the Puget Sound Regional Council for approving a third runway. While the panel acknowledged the Port's extensive noise abatement programs, the majority found they fell short of the meaningful reductions required under Resolution A-93-03. The panel also determined that neither demand management improvements nor alternative transportation options, such as rail, would sufficiently reduce air travel demand to eliminate the need for the additional runway.
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Press Release, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third RunwayFolderPuget Sound Regional Council
  • 1996-03-27

    Comparison of Expert Arbitration Panel’s review of noise and demand/system management issues at Sea-Tac Airport in March 1996 and FAA’s record of approval of Sea-Tac’s Part 150 noise compatibility program

    This document compares a 1996 Expert Arbitration Panel's findings on aircraft noise at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport with the FAA's 2013-2018 Part 150 Noise Compatibility Program approval, revealing that many of the same unresolved noise abatement and mitigation issues identified decades ago remain unaddressed today. Communities surrounding Sea-Tac — including Burien, Normandy Park, and Des Moines — continue to experience increasing noise and air pollution as flight operations have grown from 387,000 in 1995 to over 438,000 in 2018. The document calls out regulators and the Port of Seattle for failing to make meaningful progress on commitments such as nighttime flight restrictions, engine run-up controls, and departure corridor compliance.
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Noise Abatement Procedures, Part 150, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderSP #2
  • 1996-03-27

    Final decision on noise issues: Expert Arbitration Panel’s review of noise and demand/system management issues at Sea-Tac International Airport

    In March 1996, an Expert Arbitration Panel appointed by Washington State concluded that Seattle's Port had not sufficiently reduced real on-the-ground noise impacts around Sea-Tac International Airport to meet the conditions required by Puget Sound Regional Council Resolution A-93-03 for approving a third runway. The Panel majority found that, despite an extensive array of noise abatement and mitigation programs, measurable noise reductions for surrounding communities were inadequate. One panel member dissented, arguing the Port had met the Resolution's requirements.
    TagsPSRC, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderPuget Sound Regional Council
  • 1317 public comment archives pdf
    1996-01-01

    PSRC Archives Box 1317: Administration Subject Files, 1992–1996

    Archives and storage record for Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC) Administration Department Subject Files, Box 1317 (CID 10992, Box No. 01285), prepared by Angie Daniels, covering 1992–1996. Contents include Airport Litigation Documents; correspondence received for PSRC Executive Board Members (April–July 1996); Memo from Bricklin/Gendler LLP to PSRC Exec Board re Legal/Financial Implications of Noise Panel
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Port Of Seattle, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderRecords Transferred to WA State Archives
  • 1996-01-01

    Masters of Public Comments to Expert Panel Noise Decision/MTP Amendment (Copies) Box #2 — 1996

    This archival record (Box No. 01427) contains masters of public comments submitted between March 28 and July 11, 1996, regarding the Expert Panel Noise Decision and Master Transportation Plan (MTP) amendment, along with accompanying copies designated as Box #2. The record was prepared by Doris Dungan on July 26, 2005, under the AIR department code, and is stored offsite with a permanent 'Keep' retention status.
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Noise, PSRC, public hearing, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderPRR-2026-07-30
  • 194242360 master public comment pdf
    1996-01-01

    Masters of Public Comments to Expert Panel Noise Decision/MTP Amendment (Copies) Box #2 — 1996

    Archives and Storage record (Box No. 01427, Historical Box No. 194242360, Historical ID 329) prepared by Doris Dungan on 26 July 2005 for the AIR department at Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC). Contents are masters of public comments submitted between 3/28/1996 and 7/11/1996 to the Expert Panel Noise Decision/MTP (Metropolitan Transportation Plan) amendment process —
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Noise, PSRC, public hearing, Puget Sound Regional CouncilFolderPRR-2026-07-30

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 20
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Olympia 082818 M3A6759" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V