Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2609)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-06-01

    Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Propeller Aircraft Flight Track Patterns

    This Port of Seattle document explains flight track plots for propeller aircraft at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, showing the ground paths of arrivals and departures during daytime hours (6 a.m. to 10 p.m.) for both north and south traffic flows. Aircraft flight paths vary due to pilot technique, weather, and air traffic control, meaning planes assigned the same route will not follow identical tracks. On average, Sea-Tac experiences south flow conditions 65% of the year and north flow 35%, with propeller aircraft kept on separate tracks from faster jet aircraft.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsFlight Tracks, Map, Port Of Seattle, Propeller Airports, Sea-Tac AirportFolderAdvertising
  • 1998-06-01

    Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Jet Aircraft Flight Track Patterns: North Flow and South Flow, Summer 1998

    This Port of Seattle document explains flight track plots for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, which map the ground paths of jet aircraft arrivals and departures during daytime hours (6am–10pm). It describes how wind conditions determine whether aircraft fly in a north or south flow pattern, with south flow occurring about 65% of the year. The document also notes that even aircraft following identical routes will not fly the exact same path, due to variations in pilot technique, weather, air traffic control, and aircraft performance.
    CategoriesCorrespondence TagsAir Traffic Control, Flight Tracks, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderAdvertising
  • Sea tac commercial aircraft noise footprint comparison 1998 pdf
    1998-06-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport: Commercial Aircraft Noise Footprint Comparison

    Port of Seattle brochure comparing noise footprints (DNL) of Stage II jet aircraft (727-200, 727-100, DC860, DC930, F28), Stage III jet aircraft (747-400, DC1030, 757-200, 737-300, 737-400, 737-200 Hush, MD82), and General Aviation & Commuter aircraft (Gulfstream 4, Cessna Citation 5, Dash 8, Dornier 328) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport). Explains Day-Night Average Sound
    Tagsaircraft, DNL65, Map, Noise, Part 150, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderNoise
  • 1998-06-01

    Sea-Tac International Airport: Commercial Aircraft Noise Footprint Comparison

    This Sea-Tac International Airport brochure, prepared by the Port of Seattle in Summer 1998, compares the noise footprints of Stage II jets, Stage III jets, and general aviation/commuter aircraft to help residents understand the noise impacts of different aircraft types. It explains that Stage III aircraft are significantly quieter than Stage II aircraft, and that replacing older Stage II planes with newer Stage III models would meaningfully reduce noise levels in surrounding communities. The document also defines key noise measurement terminology, including DNL (Day-Night Average Sound Level), and notes that nighttime flights carry a 10-decibel penalty in noise accounting.
    Tagsaircraft, DNL65, Map, Noise, Part 150, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderNoise
  • 1998-06-01

    Sound Information: Sea-Tac Airport Noise Abatement Office Newsletter, Summer 1998

    This Summer 1998 newsletter from the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Noise Abatement Office covers the Noise Remedy/Home Sound Insulation Program, explaining how the program boundary was established using 65 DNL noise contours and noting that 6,375 of 10,000 eligible homes had been insulated by Q1 1998. It also includes a quarterly report on fleet noise compliance, flight pattern changes, and an update on the Part 150 Noise Study, which was set to be presented at a public open house on July 23, 1998. Additionally, the newsletter lists upcoming regional airshow events for summer 1998, including Seafair and the Blue Angels, along with associated noise complaint contact numbers.
    TagsNoise Abatement Procedures, Noise Remedy Program, Part 150, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFlyers
  • 1998-05-27

    Port of Seattle in violation of Federal Grant Assurance C.6 And State RCW 53.54.020

    This document compiles evidence alleging that the Port of Seattle violated Federal Grant Assurance C.6 and Washington State law RCW 53.54.020 in connection with its noise compatibility program at Sea-Tac Airport. It includes letters from elected officials, audit findings by Deloitte & Touche, and records showing the Port received over $100 million in federal funds for FAR Part 150 noise mitigation while allegedly failing to comply with the program's requirements. Supporting materials span 1990–1998 and involve Congress members, state legislators, the FAA, and the Washington State Auditor's Office.
    TagsAdam Smith, Federal Grant Assurance C.6, GAO, Minnie O Brasher, Port Of Seattle, RCW 53.54.020, Sound InsulationFolderNoise Mitigation
  • 1998-05-25

    EXH AR035118: Response to Comments on the Public Notice for Permit Reference No. 96-4-02325 — Master Plan Development Actions at STIA, Port Of Seattle

    Port Of Seattle response to public and agency comments on Army Corps of Engineers Public Notice Permit Reference No. 96-4-02325 for Master Plan Development Actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. AR035118/AR035119. Addresses six major concerns: EPA/COE MOA wetland impact sequencing and compensatory mitigation; justification for out-of-watershed mitigation (Auburn wetland) for wildlife habitat; South Aviation Support Area
    TagsACC, Auburn Wetland, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third RunwayFolderBox 14
  • 1998-04-20

    EXH AR035981: Comment Binder B — Letters to the Corps and Ecology During Second Public Comment Period (April–April 1998)

    Port of Seattle Comment Binder B for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update, containing letters submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the second public comment period (April 9–20, 1998) and comments to Washington State Department of Ecology during the entire public comment period (December 19, 1997–April 29, 1998). Includes a letter dated
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Environmental Impact Statement, FAA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 15
  • 1998-04-09

    EXH AR024336: Fisheries Consultants Letter to Army Corps – STIA Third Runway Aquatic Habitat & Fish Impacts, Miller Creek

    A 1998 letter from Fisheries Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concludes that SeaTac Airport's proposed Third Runway will have an overall neutral effect on aquatic habitat and fish populations in Miller Creek. Minor benefits are expected from new storm flow detention facilities, which will reduce peak flood flows by 5–20%, and from a planned 100-foot-wide stream buffer created through residential buyouts along the creek. Adverse impacts are limited to the temporary disruption of a quarter-mile creek relocation and an approximate 8% reduction in late-summer low stream flows due to increased paved surfaces and wetland fill.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, EIS, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1998-04-09

    EXH AR035307: Comment Binder A — Third Runway Corps/Ecology Public Comments, December 1997–April 1998

    Comment Binder A compiled by Port of Seattle for Sea-Tac Airport (Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) third runway project, containing letters submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers during the initial comment period (December 19, 1997 to January 20, 1998) and comments from the joint Corps/Ecology public hearing held April 9, 1998. Includes a January 15,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 15

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 … Page 261
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Aerial View of Sea-Tac Airport Southern Edge Showing Construction and Cargo Facilities" — , 2001

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V