Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-31

    EXH 408: Supplemental Response to ACC Interrogatory No. 4 — Expert Witness Prior Experience

    This January 31, 2002 letter from Foster Pepper & Shefelman attorneys transmits the Port of Seattle's supplemental response to an interrogatory filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), listing the prior expert-witness experience of the Port's designated witnesses. The document covers experts in areas such as groundwater hydrology, computer modeling of land development impacts, and FAA obstacle clearance standards, submitted in connection with the case Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and the Port of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-160). It is part of the administrative record related to disputes over Sea-Tac Airport's environmental and operational practices.
    TagsACC, Foster Pepper, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH AR004627: ACC and CASE Reply in Support of Certificate of Appealability, PCHB No. 01-160

    Reply brief filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, in support of their Request for Certificate of Appealability and Application for Direct Review by the Court of Appeals. Filed January 30, 2002. Argues under RCW 34.05.518(3)(b) that detrimental delay, fundamental
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 411: NHC Letter to US Army Corps Engineers Low Streamflow Analysis Miller Creek Walker Creek Des Moines Creek

    A January 2002 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis related to Sea-Tac Airport's third runway development. The letter identifies critical flaws in hydrologic modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, including double-counting of groundwater discharges, flawed seepage modeling methodology, and failure to account for construction impacts on stream low flows. The consultants argue these errors cause the Port to substantially underestimate the project's negative impacts on local stream flows.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 248: NHC Letter to USACE — ACC Technical Review Low Streamflow Analysis, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A January 2002 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis for SeaTac Airport, identifying serious modeling errors that led to underestimated impacts on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. Key flaws include double-counting of groundwater discharges in the Miller Creek model, inconsistent methodology for assessing embankment seepage, and failure to account for updated construction methods. The letter was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR027041: Photographs by Peter Eglick During Site Visit on January 28, 2002

    Photographs taken by Peter Eglick during a site visit on January 28, 2002, filed as part of the Administrative Record (AR 027041–027043). The images show ground-level views of a dark gravelly or paved surface with water pooling and streaking, possibly documenting stormwater, contamination, or site conditions at or near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004644: Letter from Michael P. Witek (Helsell Fetterman) to Presiding Officer Cottingham Re: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160, with Wallula Power Project Site Certification Cover Sheet and 50 C.F.R. §402.02

    Letter dated January 23, 2002 from attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, No. 01-160. Transmits two enclosures inadvertently omitted from Exhibit D to the Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004654: Declaration of Jeff Kray — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Jeff Kray, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, Ecology Division, filed January 23, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) are appellants against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Attaches two documents: (1) Amended Final Findings
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004678: Port Of Seattle’s Reply Supporting Motion To Compel Document Production — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s reply brief supporting its motion to compel document production in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed January 23, 2002. Port argues ACC has produced zero documents despite Port producing 22 boxes, 23 compact discs, and 4 hard diskettes. Port
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR031469: Review of Third Runway Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan, 401 Certification Condition E.3, Port Of Seattle, November 2001

    Internal memo from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Jeannie Summerhays, Steve Alexander), dated January 23, 2002, reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan (EFMP) for the Third Runway, 401 Certification Condition E.3. Comments cover requirements for logic tree flow diagrams for tiered sampling and staged screening (groundwater, seepage), statistical methods for baseline
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 12
  • 2002-01-22

    EXH AR019668: Memo Clark to Agid – Summit Ridge Fill Source & Petroleum-Impacted Soil, Third Runway Embankment

    This January 2002 memo from the Port of Seattle describes an environmental incident in which soil from the Summit Ridge fill site in Bellevue, Washington—potentially contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons from a former home heating oil tank—was temporarily placed in the Third Runway embankment during construction. Upon discovery of the contamination in October 2000, the Port halted all haul from the site and removed approximately 1,540 tons of soil, disposing of it at a facility in Everett. The Port subsequently implemented additional environmental safeguards, including full-time on-site supervision, to prevent further transport of impacted soil to the Third Runway.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 … Page 262
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "2026 05 26 rm 11b presentation SAMP ntp draft SEPA EIS page 15" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V