TagPort Of Seattle(2611)

Declaration by Rachael Paschal Osborn, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed March 13, 2002, in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Supports ACC’s Motion in Limine to exclude testimony from Dave Garland, a witness for the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of

Pre-hearing brief filed by Port Of Seattle before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues that Ecology’s 401 water quality certification for the STIA third runway and Master Plan Update (MPU)

Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion in limine filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, seeking exclusion of plans and reports produced after the February 1, 2002 deadline set in the October 30, 2001 Prehearing Order. Motion specifically targets Ecology Exhibit 13203

Declaration by Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman LLP filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, in support of ACC’s Motion in Limine. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued

Evidentiary Order from the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case no. 01-160, filed March 12, 2002, in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order addresses admissibility of exhibits, witness order, exchange of exhibits, motions in limine (including one for David

In March 2002, the Port of Seattle filed a motion asking the Pollution Control Hearings Board to quash a subpoena issued by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) seeking testimony from Dr. Linda Logan, an employee of consulting firm Parametrix. The Port argued two reasons for quashing: Dr. Logan did not appear on any party's final witness list as required by the Board's pre-hearing order, and the accompanying notice under Civil Rule 43(f) was improper because Dr. Logan was neither a party nor a managing agent of the Port of Seattle.

Table of contents for the prehearing briefs filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), received March 9, 2002. Document challenges Ecology’s issuance of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and CZMA certification for the Port Of Seattle’s Third Runway project, raising issues

Declaration of Ray Hellwig, Regional Director at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, filed in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Hellwig attests to receiving a transcribed voicemail from Tom Luster on or about September 17, 2001, in which Luster disclosed he

Opposition brief filed March 7, 2002, by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) to the Department of Ecology’s motion in limine in PCHB No. 01-160, arguing that WAC 371-08-475(7) (Former Employee as Expert Witness) does not bar testimony by Thomas R. Luster. ACC argues Luster was reassigned from the Port of

Declaration by Peter J. Eglick, attorney for Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), filed March 7, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Filed in opposition to Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine regarding WAC 371-08-475(7). Attaches Exhibit A (deposition transcript of Thomas Fitzsimmons, January 18, 2002,