Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-10-18

    EXH AR023911: Email Luster to Ecology Staff – STIA 401 Certification Requirements & Minority Opinion

    In an October 18, 2000 email, Tom Luster of Washington State Department of Ecology shares his draft notes from a discussion about what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet Section 401 water quality certification requirements related to Sea-Tac Airport. Luster acknowledges that his views represent a minority opinion within the group, but argues his written notes may be clearer than his verbal explanations and could help prepare the agency to respond to similar questions likely to arise during public review. He expresses hope that sharing these notes will help the team reach a legally defensible decision on the 401 certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-10-17

    Exhibit 216: Tom Luster Draft Memo on Adequacy of Ecology’s 401 Review for Proposed Sea-Tac Expansion

    In October 2000, Washington State Department of Ecology staff member Tom Luster raised concerns about the adequacy of Ecology's Clean Water Act Section 401 certification review for the proposed Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Luster identified multiple unresolved issues, including insufficient stormwater pollution controls, unevaluated wetland and water quality impacts, and conflicts between Ecology's approach and federal Clean Water Act requirements. He warned that failing to address these issues could result in a legally indefensible permit and degraded water quality in nearby creeks and wetlands.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-16

    Exhibit 7: STIA Construction Site Stormwater Monitoring — October 16 and 20, 2000

    STIA Construction Site Stormwater Monitoring reports dated 10/16/00 and 10/20/00, samplers JL/RS and JB/RS. Documents turbidity and pH measurements at multiple Sea-Tac Airport construction sites including Logistics Site Development (Tyee Pond, Des Moines Creek outfall), MWS Lagoon 3 Construction, Airfield Improvement (SDS3-594, SDS-6, SDS-7), Dobbs Flight Kitchen Remodel (SDE4-611, SDE4-607, SDE4-615, SDE4-601, SDE4-602), Booster Pump
    TagsACC, Construction, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2000-10-16

    EXH AR023656: Memo Nye to Alexander — Changing Scope Agreed Order, Cleanup Actions or CAP

    This October 2000 internal memo from Roger Nye to TCP Section Head Steve Alexander explains the history of the Agreed Order between Washington State Ecology and the Port of Seattle regarding environmental cleanup at Sea-Tac Airport. It describes how the Port agreed to conduct a large-scale groundwater evaluation under an Agreed Order, with the understanding that a risk-based cleanup remedy scenario would be developed if contamination risk proved low. The memo also notes that the Agreed Order intentionally excluded language about remedial actions, with Ecology reserving the right to formally intervene if cleanup became necessary.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10
  • 2000-10-13

    Exhibit 215: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 13, 2000

    These are the official draft meeting notes from October 13, 2000 negotiations between the Port of Seattle, the Washington Department of Ecology, and King County regarding the 401 Water Quality Permit for Sea-Tac Airport's proposed third runway. The meeting covered technical issues including stormwater management, natural resource mitigation planning, and a master list of permit issues tracked by resolution status. Representatives from multiple agencies worked to resolve outstanding questions about detention sizing, wetland hydrology, and environmental compliance requirements.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-13

    EXH AR046165: Hart Crowser Memorandum — Effects on Infiltration and Base Flow, Proposed Third Runway Embankment

    Memorandum dated October 13, 2000 from Michael Bailey P.E. and Michael Kenrick P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson P.E. at HNTB (project J-4978-06), analyzing infiltration into the proposed Third Runway embankment at Sea-Tac Airport and effects on shallow water-bearing zone base flow to Miller Creek and adjacent wetlands. Analysis uses three sequential models —
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-10-13

    EXH AR029009: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 13, 2000

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations held October 13, 2000. Attendees include representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tom Luster, Erik Stockdale), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith Smith), King County (Kelly
    TagsACC, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2000-10-11

    Exhibit 191: Email Chain Forwarding Erik Stockdale’s Sea-Tac Natural Resource Mitigation Plan Comments

    Email chain AR 018494 in which Erik Stockdale (Washington State Department of Ecology, ESTO461@ECY.WA.GOV) sends internal memo to Gail Terzi and Jonathan Freedman (Army Corps of Engineers) outlining status of the natural resource mitigation plan and associated documents for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Stockdale notes the Port of Seattle is objecting to Ecology’s choice of consultant
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-10

    EXH AR029002: Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Negotiations — Final Draft Meeting Notes, October 10, 2000

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway Section 401 Permit Negotiations meeting held October 10, 2000, 9:00–4:00. Attendees included representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Tom Luster, Chung Ki Yee), Port Of Seattle (Michael Cheyne, Elizabeth Leavitt, Keith
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 11
  • 2000-10-09

    Exhibit 214: Tom Luster Draft Memo — Sea-Tac 401 Issues List for Ecology Reviewers

    A October 9, 2000 internal memo from Tom Luster to Ecology's SeaTac reviewers outlines a draft list of unresolved issues related to the SeaTac Airport 401 water quality certification review. The issues cover stormwater management, streamflows, wetland impacts, and environmental mitigation plans, including concerns about cumulative impacts on Des Moines Creek and Miller Creek from several interconnected proposed projects. The memo notes that some issues may require only minor document clarifications while others may need significant new documentation or development of formal 401 permit conditions.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Third Amendment to Consultant Contract between the City of Sea-Tac, the City of Burien, and Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V