Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMTCA(83)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH 2237 (AR 034850): Workbook Tools Calculating Soil & Groundwater Cleanup Levels MTCA — User’s Guide

    This 2001 User's Guide from the Washington State Department of Ecology explains how to use spreadsheet workbook tools (MTCASGL and MTCATPH) to calculate soil and groundwater cleanup levels under the Model Toxics Control Act. The guide covers how to enter site-specific data—such as chemical properties, exposure parameters, and hydrogeological characteristics—to determine safe contamination thresholds. It is intended for environmental cleanup professionals working on hazardous substance remediation in Washington State.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, State of WashingtonFolderBox 14
  • 2001-07-10

    EXH AR025055: Email Chain — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language Draft 401 Certification STIA Third Runway

    This document is an email chain from June-July 2001 between Washington State Department of Ecology staff discussing acceptable fill material criteria for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Officials debated whether to restrict fill to naturally occurring uncontaminated soils or to allow other materials subject to contamination testing standards, with recommendations including requiring the top six feet of fill to be clean natural soil and using Table 749-3 screening values to protect plants and animals. The discussion also addressed whether the state's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) standards should apply, including requirements for contaminant testing, groundwater monitoring, and terrestrial ecological evaluation.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR017357: Email Chain RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Internal email chain dated June 27, 2001 from Peter Kmet (Ecology HQ/TCP) to Kevin Fitzpatrick, cc Chung K. Yee, marked ‘Deliberative Document Currently Exempt From Public Disclosure.’ Kmet recommends language for fill material criteria in the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project, including: requiring the uppermost 6 feet of fill
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, WACFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR017499: Email Chain on Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Internal email chain dated June 27, 2001 among Peter Kmet, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Chung K. Yee, and others at Washington State Department of Ecology regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway Master Plan improvements. Kmet recommends against restricting fill to naturally occurring uncontaminated soils and proposes
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-27

    EXH AR023937: Email Chain — Acceptable Fill Criteria Language Draft 401 Certification STIA Third Runway

    This 2001 email chain among Washington State Department of Ecology staff discusses recommended criteria for fill material to be used in the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Staff member Peter Kmet proposed requiring fill material to meet ecological screening values from Table 749-3, with the uppermost six feet consisting of clean, naturally occurring soil free of manmade organic compounds and metals above natural background levels. The discussion also covers the applicability of the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) standards and the need to address potential impacts on plants, animals, groundwater, and aquatic organisms.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-06-26

    Exhibit 25: Email from Chung K. Yee re Sea-Tac Third Runway Fill Criteria for 401 Water Quality Certification

    Email dated June 26, 2001 from Chung K. Yee to Craig E. Thompson and Kevin Fitzpatrick (Ecology) transmitting draft fill criteria requirements for the 401 Water Quality Certification for the SeaTac Third Runway Embankment project. Attachments include: draft clean fill criteria, spreadsheets deriving surface water quality criteria and ground water cleanup levels using three-phase model
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 2043: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification and Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Memo dated June 22, 2001 from Ching-Pi Wang (Toxics Cleanup Program, TCP) to Ann Kenny regarding TCP recommendations for 401 certification related to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Three recommendations: (1) Port of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant transport to soil and groundwater via
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 73: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification — Port Of Seattle Third Runway

    Memorandum from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Ray Hellwig, Roger Nye, John Wietfeld, Steve Alexander) dated June 22, 2001, outlining Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP) recommendations for 401 certification related to the Port Of Seattle Third Runway project. Three recommendations: (1) Port Of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR050641: Draft Technical Memorandum — Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Draft technical memorandum prepared by Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI, Project No. BV99122C) for Port Of Seattle, dated June 19, 2001, analyzing preferential ground water flow paths relative to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Responds to Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) request regarding whether contaminated ground water below the Aviation Operations
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 21
  • 2001-06-19

    EXH AR17302: Email Chain RE: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification

    Email chain (AR017302) among Washington State Department of Ecology staff Chung K. Yee, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Craig Thompson, and AAG Joan Marchioro regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Water Quality Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Key issues include: whether Ecology’s 401 WQ Certification fill criteria should ‘stand alone’ from
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 … Page 9
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V