Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagMTCA(87)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 9406 Pdf
    2013-01-01

    Model Toxics Control Act Regulation and Statute

    A compilation document containing Washington State’s Model Toxics Control Act regulation (Chapter 173-340 WAC), the Model Toxics Control Act statute (Chapter 70.105D RCW), and the Uniform Environmental Covenants Act (Chapter 64.70 RCW). Published by the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Toxics Cleanup Program as Publication No. 94-06, revised in 2013.
    TagsEcology, Environmental Protection Agency, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, State of Washington
  • Conthydrantfuelsystpr pdf
    2011-04-01

    Periodic review: Continental Airlines Hydrant Fuel System, SeaTac International Airport

    A periodic review by the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Toxics Cleanup Program of post-cleanup site conditions at the Continental Airlines Hydrant Fuel System located at SeaTac International Airport, Concourse C and North Satellite. The review evaluates whether cleanup actions conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) are protecting human health and the environment,
    TagsEcology, Environment, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2011-04-01

    Periodic review: Continental Airlines Hydrant Fuel System, SeaTac International Airport

    A periodic review by the Washington State Department of Ecology’s Toxics Cleanup Program of post-cleanup site conditions at the Continental Airlines Hydrant Fuel System located at SeaTac International Airport, Concourse C and North Satellite. The review evaluates whether cleanup actions conducted under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) are protecting human health and the environment,
    TagsEcology, Environment, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Sea-Tac Airport
  • Toxic Runway

    Piles of dirt pose problems for Sea-Tac. By Roger Downey AT A MEETING OCTOBER 4, it looked as though the two-year war between the Port of Seattle and the state Department of Ecology might be over. Port planners acknowledged their failure to answer important questions about plans for a third runway for Sea-Tac International Airport. Ecology staff
    CategoriesFrom The Web, History TagsModel Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Roger Downey, Seattle Weekly
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR033807: WAC 173-340-747 Deriving Soil Concentrations for Ground Water Protection — Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Project

    Exhibit AR033807, WAC 173-340-747 soil concentration calculations for ground water and surface water protection under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA), SeaTac Third Runway Embankment Project. Tables derive cleanup levels for hazardous substances including antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium +3, chromium +6, copper, mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, zinc, and lead using Equations 747-1 and
    TagsACC, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, soil, Third Runway, WAC
  • 2002-10-22

    EXH AR034961: John J. Strunk, Associate Geologist — Resume, Associated Earth Sciences, Inc.

    Resume of John J. Strunk, Associate Geologist at Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI), Bainbridge Island, WA. Over sixteen years of experience in environmental and ground water industry. Projects include Area-Wide Ground Water Study at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport) under MTCA Agreed Order between Ecology and Port Of Seattle; Third Runway project support regarding ground
    TagsACC, King County, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019658: Third Runway Soil Fill Quality Criteria

    This document outlines the Port of Seattle's soil fill quality criteria for the first phase of construction of a new runway embankment, involving approximately 820,000 cubic yards of material placed in 1998. It details the approved sources for fill material, technical specifications for soil gradation and contamination standards, and the certification and monitoring processes required of contractors. Independent soil technicians and Port consultants were tasked with overseeing material delivery, placement, and compliance testing throughout the project.
    TagsACC, Construction, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-10-20

    EXH AR019624: Three Phase Back Calculations Table — Soil Cleanup Levels

    This document presents three-phase back calculations for soil contamination levels at a site, listing various chemical constituents including heavy metals (arsenic, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, zinc) and petroleum products (TPH, gasoline, heavy oils). The table compares cleanup criteria from multiple regulatory frameworks including ambient water quality criteria (AWQC), drinking water standards, Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) methods, and Fish and Wildlife Service ecological screening levels. The calculations were used to evaluate soil remediation thresholds based on leaching potential and ecological risk, with source references including EPA and MTCA SSL tables dated August 2001.
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third Runway
  • 2002-08-22

    Port Of Seattle’s petition for reconsideration regarding Condition 8

    The Port of Seattle filed a petition in August 2002 asking the Pollution Control Hearings Board to reconsider Condition 8 of its Final Order, which prohibited the use of a soil-testing method called SPLP (Synthetic Precipitation Leaching Procedure) to approve fill material for the Third Runway expansion project at Sea-Tac Airport. The Port argued that banning SPLP made it nearly impossible to find acceptable fill soil, since up to 78% of naturally occurring, uncontaminated soils would fail the Board's strict numeric criteria when tested across multiple constituents. The Port maintained that proper use of SPLP poses no environmental threat to water quality and requested the Board allow its use under specific conditions so the runway project could proceed.
    TagsFill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2002-02-26

    EXH 457: Second Declaration Dr. Patrick Lucia Supporting ACC Motion for Stay (PCHB Nos. 01-133, 01-160)

    This legal declaration by Dr. Patrick Lucia, filed in a Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board case, argues that the Department of Ecology lacks reasonable assurance that fill material used to construct the Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway embankment meets environmental safety standards. Dr. Lucia contends that the certification allows soil concentrations of arsenic and other metals — including cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and nickel — that significantly exceed Puget Sound natural background levels. He also criticizes the Port of Seattle's soil sampling approach as arbitrary and unscientific, asserting it fails to meet accepted environmental engineering standards for contaminant testing.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 … Page 9
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "stni home banner 12312022" — , 2022

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V