Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEnvironmental Impact Statement(328)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-12-01

    EXH AR009210: Wetland Functional Assessment and Impact Analysis — Master Plan Update Improvements, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Wetland Functional Assessment and Impact Analysis prepared by Parametrix, Inc. (Kirkland, Washington) for Port Of Seattle, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, December 2000, project number 556-2912-001 (03). Document filed in PCHB No. 01-133, received October 1, 2001 by Environmental Hearings Office, submitted as part of Port of Seattle’s Memo Opposing ACC’s Motion for Stay, Declaration of James
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 05
  • 2000-12-01

    EXH AR048591: Natural Resource Mitigation Plan, Master Plan Update Improvements, STIA

    Final Natural Resource Mitigation Plan prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for Port Of Seattle, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements, December 2000 (AR 048591, project 556-2912-001). Covers wetland delineation and descriptions, Miller Creek Basin, Des Moines Creek Basin, Gilliam Creek, South Aviation Support Area (SASA), runway safety area extensions, South 154th Street relocation, on-site borrow
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Master Plan, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 20
  • 2000-12-01

    EXH AR009646: Natural Resource Mitigation Plan — Master Plan Update Improvements, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Final Natural Resource Mitigation Plan prepared by Parametrix, Inc. for Port Of Seattle covering Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, dated December 2000. Filed as part of PCHB No. 01-133, Port of Seattle’s memo opposing ACC’s motion for stay, Volume 3 of 3, received by Environmental Hearings Office on October 1, 2001. Includes
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Master Plan, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 05
  • 2000-11-27

    Exhibit 106: Ecology Memorandum on Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 Wetland Impacts and Recommendations for Wetland Preservation

    Memorandum dated November 27, 2000 from Dave Garland, NWRO Water Quality, Washington State Department of Ecology, to Ann Kenny and Kevin Fitzpatrick regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland impacts. Addresses Port Of Seattle proposal to excavate sand and gravel from Borrow Area 3 south of Sea-Tac Airport for Third Runway fill embankment. References
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2000-11-27

    Exhibit 2097: Memorandum — Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 Wetland Impacts Recommendations for Wetland Preservation

    Memorandum dated November 27, 2000 from Dave Garland, NWRO Water Quality Program, Washington State Department of Ecology, to Ann Kenny (Shorelands and Environmental Assessment Program) and Kevin Fitzpatrick (Water Quality Program). Subject is wetland hydrology impacts from Port Of Seattle’s proposed excavation of Borrow Area 3 sand and gravel fill for the Sea-Tac Third Runway
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 14
  • 2000-11-21

    EXH AR018468: Sheldon & Associates Proposal for Natural Resource Mitigation Plan Review — Sea-Tac Third Runway

    Letter and proposal from Dyanne Sheldon, Principal of Sheldon & Associates, Inc. (Seattle, WA), addressed to Erik Stockdale at Washington State Department of Ecology, dated November 21, 2000, submitting a proposal to review the Natural Resource Mitigation Plan (NRMP) for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. The letter discusses cost estimate exceeding the provided $18,000 budget, justifying
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-10-25

    EXH AR046081: Port Of Seattle Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers — CWA Section 404 Permit Application (JARPA) for STIA Master Plan Update Projects

    Letter dated October 25, 2000 from Elizabeth Leavitt, Manager of Aviation Environmental Programs, Port of Seattle, to Jonathan Freedman, Regulatory Branch, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, submitting a new Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application (JARPA) for Clean Water Act Section 404 permit, Corps of Engineers Project No. 96-4-02325, for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 19
  • 2000-10-20

    ACC Comments on Draft EIS for Update of Central Puget Sound Region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Destination 2030)

    In October 2000, attorneys representing the Airport Communities Coalition — comprising the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, along with the Highline School District — submitted formal comments objecting to the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The letter argues that the DEIS violates SEPA requirements by refusing to analyze aviation alternatives, including whether Sea-Tac's controversial third runway project was still justified given changed demand forecasts and its ballooning costs. It also challenges the DEIS for failing to provide current data on aircraft noise impacts, noting that noise contours around Sea-Tac appeared to be growing rather than shrinking as previously forecast.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, PSRC, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • Psrc comments deis destination 2030 pdf
    2000-10-20

    ACC Comments on Draft EIS for Update of Central Puget Sound Region’s Metropolitan Transportation Plan (Destination 2030)

    In October 2000, attorneys representing the Airport Communities Coalition — comprising the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, and Tukwila, along with the Highline School District — submitted formal comments objecting to the Puget Sound Regional Council's Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Destination 2030 Metropolitan Transportation Plan. The letter argues that the DEIS violates SEPA requirements by refusing to analyze aviation alternatives, including whether Sea-Tac's controversial third runway project was still justified given changed demand forecasts and its ballooning costs. It also challenges the DEIS for failing to provide current data on aircraft noise impacts, noting that noise contours around Sea-Tac appeared to be growing rather than shrinking as previously forecast.
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, PSRC, SEPA, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 2000-10-20

    EXH AR046044: Sea-Tac Third Runway – Borrow Area 3 Preservation of Wetlands Memorandum

    Memorandum dated October 20, 2000 from Michael A.P. Kenrick, P.E. and Michael J. Bailey, P.E. of Hart Crowser to Jim Thomson of HNTB regarding Sea-Tac Third Runway Borrow Area 3 wetland preservation, project J-4978-06, prepared for Port Of Seattle. Covers hydrology sustaining Wetlands 29, B9, 30, B7, B6, and B5 in Borrow Area 3, including
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 19

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 … Page 33
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V