Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagEcology(788)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-02-01

    Exhibit 706: Deposition of Thomas Luster, PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Deposition upon oral examination of Thomas Luster, taken February 1, 2002, in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster, represented by Richard A. Smith of Smith & Lowney, was deposed by Gillis E. Reavis (Marten Brown) for Port Of Seattle and Thomas J. Young (Assistant Attorney
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 10
  • 2002-02-01

    EXH AR031007: Washington State Wetland Mitigation Evaluation Study Phase 2: Evaluating Success

    Washington State Department of Ecology Shorelands & Environmental Assistance Program study (Publication No. 02-06-009, AR 031007) authored by Patricia Johnson, Dana L. Mock, Andy McMillan, Lauren Driscoll, and Tom Hruby. Phase 2 evaluation of wetland mitigation success across 24 projects in Washington State, published February 2002. Companion document Appendix F (publication #02-06-010) contains individual project
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of WashingtonFolderBox 12
  • 2002-02-01

    Tacoma Smelter Plume Project: Overview Presentation

    The Washington State Department of Ecology's Tacoma Smelter Plume Project investigates soil contamination caused by air emissions from the former Asarco smelter, with the primary goal of protecting public health and the environment from low-level, area-wide contamination. The project aims to keep local governments and citizens informed while developing long-term solutions to manage contamination over time. As part of a broader Area-Wide Contamination Strategy, the state is also addressing similar issues at other sites, including the Everett Smelter and former agricultural lands.
    TagsArsenic, Asarco, Ecology, soil, Tacoma Smelter PlumeFolderEcology
  • 2002-01-31

    PCHB Doc 4616: Certificate of Record — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    Certificate of Record filed January 31, 2002 by Tracey L. Johnson, Clerk of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), transmitting the complete administrative record for PCHB No. 01-160, Cause No. 01-2-02386-9, in the Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) is appellant against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH AR004627: ACC and CASE Reply in Support of Certificate of Appealability, PCHB No. 01-160

    Reply brief filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, in support of their Request for Certificate of Appealability and Application for Direct Review by the Court of Appeals. Filed January 30, 2002. Argues under RCW 34.05.518(3)(b) that detrimental delay, fundamental
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 283: ACC & CASE v. DOE & POS, PCHB No. 01-060 — Proposed Deposition Schedule Updated Jan. 30, 2002

    This document contains an email exchange from January 30, 2002, between legal staff at Helsell Fetterman and Foster Pepper law firms coordinating a deposition schedule for the case ACC & CASE v. DOE & POS (PCHB No. 01-060). The emails confirm scheduling adjustments, including moving Linda Logan's deposition start time to 10:00 a.m. and removing Joe Stohr (a Washington State Department of Ecology employee) from the February 19 schedule. An attached calendar lists numerous depositions scheduled between January 28 and February 23, 2002, with witnesses deposed alternately at Foster Pepper and Helsell Fetterman offices.
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-24

    EXH AR004637: Pre-Hearing Order — SHB No. 01-023, 01-024, 01-025 & 01-026 (Ecology v. Port of Grays Harbor, Mox Chehalis LLC, City of Westport)

    Pre-Hearing Order issued by the Shorelines Hearings Board (SHB) in consolidated cases SHB No. 01-023, 01-024, 01-025, and 01-026. State of Washington Department of Ecology appellant; respondents are Port of Grays Harbor, Mox Chehalis LLC, and City of Westport; intervenors are Friends of Grays Harbor and Wildlife Forever of Grays Harbor. Appeals concern a proposed
    TagsACC, Ecology, Legal, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of WashingtonFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR025095: Application Site Certification — Wallula Power Project Vol. 1

    This document is an Application for Site Certification for the Wallula Power Project in Washington State, submitted by Wallula Generation LLC to the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. The application details water management plans for the proposed power plant, including how stormwater runoff from the 66-acre site will be captured, routed through oil/water separators, and reused in the plant's cooling tower basin. The applicant argues that this stormwater reuse strategy will reduce groundwater withdrawals from the local gravel aquifer with no net regional impact on water resources.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004644: Letter from Michael P. Witek (Helsell Fetterman) to Presiding Officer Cottingham Re: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160, with Wallula Power Project Site Certification Cover Sheet and 50 C.F.R. §402.02

    Letter dated January 23, 2002 from attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, No. 01-160. Transmits two enclosures inadvertently omitted from Exhibit D to the Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR022958: Wallula Power Project Site Certification Application Vol. 1 — Water Resources

    This document is an Application for Site Certification for the Wallula Power Project in Washington State, submitted by Wallula Generation LLC to the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council. It details stormwater management plans for the 66-acre project site, including capturing rainfall and routing it through oil/water separators to a detention pond for reuse in the power plant's cooling tower. The application also addresses groundwater rights, noting that captured stormwater would reduce withdrawals from the gravel aquifer and Boise Cascade Corporation fiber farm wells.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 … Page 79
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V