Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(246)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-08

    EXH AR023076: EPA Region 10 Letter to Army Corps re STIA Third Runway Wetlands Issues

    In June 2001, the EPA's Region 10 office submitted formal comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding the Port of Seattle's Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway project, which proposed filling over 18 acres of wetlands and 980 feet of Miller Creek. The EPA raised concerns about unresolved hydrological impacts, including the effects of a proposed retaining wall on nearby wetlands and groundwater flows, the adequacy of buffers around borrow pits, and the Port's undisclosed plans for vacant land parcels in the project area. The agency urged the Corps to carefully review these wetland and Clean Water Act compliance issues before issuing a construction permit.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, EPA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-05

    Exhibit 205: Tom Luster Notes on Call with Ann Kenny re 401/Agreed Order/Governor’s Certification Letter

    In a June 2001 internal memo, Tom Luster notes a call from Ann Kenny of the Washington Department of Ecology regarding the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Kenny indicated that Ecology intended to separate the Section 401 water quality certification from the Agreed Order, planning a new study to examine possible contamination pathways from the Airport Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA) to the third runway site. Luster noted that if called upon for an affidavit, his testimony would reflect his understanding of how the key documents were connected during his time as project reviewer.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-05

    EXH AR029182: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Technical Meeting Notes, June 5, 2001

    Final draft meeting notes prepared by Rachel McCrea of Floyd & Snider Inc. for a 401 Permit Decision-Making technical meeting on June 5, 2001 regarding Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees included Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Kelly Whiting (King County), Keith Smith (Port of Seattle), Alan Black (HNTB), Paul Fendt and Tom Atkins (Parametrix).
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-01

    EXH AR017746: Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Email chain (June 1, 2001) from Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager, Water Quality Program NWRO, to Ann Kenny and Ching-Pi Wang, cc Raymond Hellwig and Steve Alexander (Ecology), forwarding deliberative draft language for clean fill criteria in the 401 Certification for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway construction. Includes August 24, 2000 email from Fitzpatrick to Tom Luster
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-05-31

    EXH AR019469: NMFS Biological Opinion — STIA Master Plan Update, ESA Section 7 & Essential Fish Habitat

    In May 2001, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued a biological opinion concluding that planned construction and expansion projects at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — including a new 8,500-foot runway and other facility upgrades — were not likely to adversely affect threatened Puget Sound chinook salmon or their designated critical habitat. The review, requested by the FAA under the Endangered Species Act, examined potential impacts to nearby waterways such as Miller, Des Moines, and Gilliam creeks, as well as Essential Fish Habitat for coastal and groundfish species. NMFS concurred with the airport's own Biological Assessment, determining the projects could proceed with the mitigation measures proposed.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, FAA, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Salmon, Third Runway
  • 2001-04-30

    EXH AR050378: Response to Comments — Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Permit 1996-4-02325

    Port Of Seattle response to agency and public comments on Section 404 Clean Water Act permit application (JARPA, permit 1996-4-02325) for Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Document AR050378 covers comments received following the December 27, 2000 second revised public notice issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Responds to Tom Luster,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-04-30

    EXH AR050083: Response to Comments — Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Permit 1996-4-02325

    Port of Seattle response to agency and public comments on Section 404 Clean Water Act permit application (JARPA, reference 1996-4-02325) for Master Plan Update improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Covers U.S. Army Corps of Engineers public notice history (December 19, 1997; September 30, 1999; December 27, 2000), wetland fill acreages, Miller Creek channel relocation, Highline
    CategoriesHistory TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, Third Runway
  • 2001-03-28

    EXH AR026298: Ecology Letter to Novadyne Engineering — Regulatory Status Prior Converted Croplands

    A March 28, 2001 letter from the Washington State Department of Ecology clarifies that lands classified as 'prior converted croplands' by the US Army Corps of Engineers are still subject to state wetland regulations if they meet the criteria outlined in the 1996 Washington State Wetland Delineation and Identification Manual. While the federal Food Security Act may exempt such lands from Clean Water Act Section 404 requirements, this exemption does not extend to state law. As a result, some wetlands may be free from federal oversight but remain fully regulated under Washington State rules.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Washington State Legislature
  • 2001-03-26

    Exhibit 2063: Ecology CZMA Status Letter for Port Of Seattle Sea-Tac Master Plan Update (1996-4-02325)

    Washington State Department of Ecology mid-point status letter dated March 26, 2001, addressed to Tom Mueller (Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District) and Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle Aviation Environmental Programs), regarding Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Consistency review for the Port Of Seattle’s Master Plan Update for SeaTac International Airport, project number 1996-4-02325. Ecology
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan, SEPA
  • 2001-03-19

    EXH AR028165: Transmittal Form and ACC Review — Miller Creek Relocation and Third Runway Wetland Impacts, Port Of Seattle STIA Master Plan Update

    Transmittal form dated March 19, 2001 from Parametrix, Inc. (James C. Kelley) to Gail Terzi and Muffy Walker, US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Branch, for Port Of Seattle project number 556-2912-01(03A), POS-Master Plan Update. Transmits responses to comments by Amanda Azous and Dyanne Sheldon, map and aerial photographs of a stream relocation project on
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Wirecutter: The Best Air Purifier" — , 2023

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V