Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1534)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH 1268: King County DNR Letter to Ecology STIA Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan

    In August 2001, King County's Department of Natural Resources wrote to the Washington Department of Ecology confirming that the Port of Seattle's Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for Sea-Tac International Airport Master Plan improvements met the technical requirements of the 1998 King County Surface Water Design Manual. The review found that the plan demonstrated a feasible conceptual strategy for managing stormwater from proposed airport construction projects. Reviewers noted that while the plan showed compliance with design standards, additional oversight and monitoring would be needed as individual projects moved from planning into construction.
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR050909: King County Review Comments on Port Of Seattle Low Flow Impact Analysis – Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal, July 2001

    Letter dated August 3, 2001 from King County Department of Natural Resources Director Pam Bissonnette to Ann Kenny, Senior Permit Specialist, Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, transmitting King County’s technical review comments on the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow Impact Analysis – Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal (July 2001). The enclosure provides
    TagsACC, Ecology, King County, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-03

    EXH AR023795: PDA Request Low Flow Analysis — Helsell Fetterman to Ecology

    In this August 3, 2001 email, Andrea Grad, a paralegal at Helsell Fetterman, submits a Public Disclosure Act (PDA) request to Ann Kenny at the Washington State Department of Ecology. Grad notes that several sections of the Port of Seattle's two-volume Low Flow Analysis — including the Introduction and the section on Determination of Impacts to Streamflow — were either incomplete or entirely missing from the copy provided by Ecology. She asks Ecology to confirm whether the Port had submitted the missing sections, and requests copies of any such materials.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-02

    EXH AR017713: Draft 401 Conditions to Address Potential Pathways — Deliberative, Do Not Disclose

    Internal email from Ann Kenny (Ecology) to Ching-Pi Wang, cc Steve Alexander (ECY) and Raymond Hellwig, dated August 2, 2001, transmitting deliberative draft Section 401 water quality certification conditions F1–F4 for the Sea-Tac Airport (STIA) Third Runway Master Plan Update. Conditions address prevention of contaminated groundwater transport from the Airport Maintenance and Operations Area via
    TagsACC, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-02

    Exhibit 96: Email — Briefing Material for Governor on Sea-Tac 3rd Runway Project

    Email from Dianne Pastore, Ecology Director’s Office, to Raymond Hellwig and Curt Hart (cc: Thomas Fitzsimmons, Sheryl Hutchison) requesting briefing materials for Tom Fitzsimmons’ meeting with the Governor and Paul Isaki on the SeaTac 3rd Runway Project. Materials requested by Dennis Clark, Governor’s Office, by COB Tuesday August 7, 2001. AR 017821, Exhibit 96.
    TagsACC, Ecology, EIS, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-02

    EXH AR022933: Review Comments – Low Flow Impact Analysis & Offset Facility Proposal, Jul 2001

    This August 2001 King County review evaluates the Port of Seattle's Low Flow Impact Analysis and proposed Flow Impact Offset Facility, which aims to mitigate reductions in stream flows in local creeks—including Des Moines, Miller, and Walker creeks—caused by future airport development. The review finds that while the proposed water storage and augmentation measures substantially offset low-flow impacts during the critical late-summer period, there are significant gaps in documentation, biological assessment, and design details that need to be addressed. Recommendations include professional engineering certification, enhanced biological monitoring, improved calibration documentation, and refinements to the reserve storage facility designs.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR017820: Email Chain — Ecology Internal Communications on Third Runway Decision Announcement Strategy

    Internal email chain dated August 1, 2001 among Washington Department of Ecology staff Thomas Fitzsimmons, Sheryl Hutchison, Dianne Pastore, and Raymond Hellwig regarding communications strategy around the Sea-Tac Airport third runway decision. Topics include scheduling media availability, coordinating with the governor and Isaki, Port Commission meeting on August 14, E-Board contact timing, press attendance at
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 2001-08-01

    Exhibit 149: Draft 401 Conditions — Auburn Mitigation Site Revisions and Performance Standards

    Deliberative memorandum dated August 1, 2001, from Katie Walter to Ann Kenny, Washington State Department of Ecology, re Draft 401 Conditions for the Auburn Mitigation Site. Covers culvert placement issues in the revised grading plan (June 28, 2001) including northwest corner drainage swale culvert (approximately 60 feet long), south central mis-located culvert, and two additional
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR053462: Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington (Volumes I–V)

    Washington State Department of Ecology Water Quality Program publication numbers 99-11 through 99-15, August 2001. Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington covering five volumes: Volume I Minimum Technical Requirements and Site Planning, Volume II Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention, Volume III Hydrologic Analysis and Flow Control Design/BMPs, Volume IV Source Control BMPs, Volume V Runoff Treatment
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR018500: Draft 401 Conditions — Auburn Mitigation Site Revisions and Performance Standards

    Deliberative memorandum dated August 1, 2001 from Katie Walter (KLW@shanwil.com) to Ann Kenny, Washington State Department of Ecology, re Draft 401 Conditions for Auburn Mitigation Site revisions. Covers culvert placement issues in revised grading plan (June 28, 2001) at northwest corner and south central portion of site, drainage swale, maintenance pathway, and southwestern basin. Performance
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Auburn Wetland, Ecology, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Sea-Tac Airport moves closer to a new terminal" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V