TagACC(1548)

Erratum filed by Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) correcting Item No. 136 in the witness and exhibit list. Corrects dates for Parametrix, Inc. draft memorandum to Port Of Seattle project files titled ‘Range-finding water-effect ratio results’ (authors L. Logan and D.

Port Of Seattle’s reply memorandum supporting its motion for partial summary judgment on Issue No. 14 (‘Did Ecology and the Port comply with SEPA?’) in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Argues the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) lacks

Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for Port Of Seattle, filed February 25, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Supports Port Of Seattle’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on SEPA Issue. Identifies and authenticates three exhibits from the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the

This February 2002 draft document from King County Department of Natural Resources presents technical review comments on the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. The review identifies several deficiencies in the hydrologic modeling for Walker Creek and Miller Creek, including inconsistencies in impervious area calculations, questionable vault-filling timelines, and concerns about the accuracy of observed streamflow data used for calibration. King County recommends additional refinements before approving the revised impact numbers, and suggests that Ecology and the Port establish a formal compliance oversight process.

King County Department of Natural Resources draft review comments (AR034844-034846) on the Port Of Seattle / Parametrix Inc. December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis – Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal. Review evaluates HSPF hydrologic modeling, impact assessment, and conceptual design of low-flow offset facilities for Miller Creek and Walker Creek against Washington State Department

Pre-filed testimony of William Rozeboom P.E., Dyanne Sheldon, and Dr. John Strand submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002, Binder #3 of 4. Document received by Environmental Hearings Office. The index references testimony of

Pre-filed testimony of William A. Rozeboom, professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, submitted on behalf of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port Of Seattle, February 22, 2002. Rozeboom testifies regarding stormwater facilities, streamflow impacts, drainage plans, post-construction monitoring, and stormwater management plans related

Pre-filed testimony of Dyanne Sheldon, environmental scientist and wetland ecologist, submitted on behalf of appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Testimony addresses discrepancies in Ecology’s regulatory authority over wetlands, restoration/creation credits, wetland function assessment, 401 permit conditions,

Pre-filed written testimony of Dr. John Strand, Ph.D. (Principal Biologist, Columbia Biological Assessments; Adjunct Professor, Washington State University Tri-Cities), submitted on behalf of Appellant Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, dated February 22, 2002. Strand’s testimony covers ecological risk assessment of stormwater

Handwritten notes dated 2/22/02 from a telephone call with Eliz. Leavitt outline five follow-up issues, including evaluation of biological impacts after implementation (involving USFWS/NMFS), a 60-day Walker Creek matter related to WL 44A, a July Des Moines Creek discussion about vaults of the same size, pH vault monitoring and recent science/technical papers, and concerns about how float vaults are designed.