Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagWater Quality(478)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-09-06

    EXH 348: Letter Water Resources Consulting to Ecology – Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility Implementation Plan

    A water resources consultant submitted comments to the Washington State Department of Ecology in September 2000, raising serious concerns about the Port of Seattle's proposed Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility, which was intended to mitigate water quality impacts from SeaTac Airport's third runway expansion. The consultant argues the plan is vague and incomplete, lacking secured water sources, hydrologic analysis, and finalized design details. Key technical problems identified include unreliable water temperature from one proposed source, dependence on continuous technological systems, and a disputed well design that may violate state groundwater protection guidelines.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-05

    EXH 369: Columbia Biological Assessments to Ecology — Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Facility Revised Plan

    A biological assessments consultant, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, critiques the Port of Seattle's revised plan to use City of Seattle drinking water to boost summer flows in Des Moines Creek near Sea-Tac Airport. The letter raises concerns that the plan inadequately addresses the toxicity of fluoride and residual chlorine in treated drinking water, which can harm fish and other aquatic life at very low levels. The consultant also warns that differences in temperature, pH, and dissolved oxygen between the makeup water and the creek could cause serious ecological damage if not corrected before augmentation begins.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2000-09-01

    EXH AR025072: Des Moines Creek Flow Augmentation Preliminary Design — STIA

    This September 2000 preliminary design report, prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants for the Port of Seattle, outlines a plan to augment water flow in Des Moines Creek near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report covers facility configuration, process components such as backflow prevention, dechlorination, and aeration systems, as well as an evaluation of chemical dechlorination alternatives. The project was designed to improve creek water quality by treating and releasing water in a controlled manner.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-24

    EXH AR017487: Email RE: Draft Language for Clean Fill Criteria in 401 Certification — Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick

    AR017487. Email from Chung K. Yee (Ecology, NWRO Water Quality Program) to Kevin Fitzpatrick dated August 24, 2000, commenting on draft clean fill criteria language for the 401 Certification for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Comments address sections E6, E7c.2.(b), E7c.2.(e), and E7c.3, covering inappropriate fill, EPA databases, Confirmed & Suspected Contaminated Sites Report,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-24

    EXH AR017275: Ecology Internal Email — Comments on Draft Clean Fill Criteria Language for 401 Certification, Third Runway

    Internal email chain from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick (Supervisor, Industrial Permit Unit, Water Quality Program, NWRO, Washington Department of Ecology) dated August 24, 2000, commenting on draft clean fill criteria language for the 401 Certification for the Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport. Comments address sections E6, E7c.2(b), E7c.2(e), E7c.2(f), and E7c.3, covering issues
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-21

    EXH AR021335: ACC Assessment — Proposed Drinking Water Augment Summer Low Flows Miller Creek & Des Moines Creek

    A fisheries biologist assessed the Port of Seattle's plan to use City of Seattle drinking water to boost summer flows in Miller and Des Moines Creeks when levels drop below 1.0 cubic feet per second. The report concludes that chlorine and fluoride in drinking water are toxic to fish and other aquatic life at very low concentrations, and that mixing drinking water into these small streams would far exceed Washington State water quality standards even with dilution. The biologist recommended against the plan and suggested that treated well water from within the local watersheds might be a less harmful alternative.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-21

    EXH 368: Columbia Biological Assessments Letter to Ecology – Drinking Water Flow Augmentation, Miller & Des Moines Creeks

    A fisheries biologist, writing on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, assessed the Port of Seattle's plan to use City of Seattle drinking water to boost low summer flows in Miller and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport. The report concludes that the drinking water's chlorine and fluoride content would be highly toxic to fish and other aquatic life, far exceeding Washington State water quality standards even after dilution in the streams. The biologist recommends against the plan and suggests that well water from within the local watersheds may be a less harmful alternative.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-18

    EXH AR023766: Revised Flow Augmentation Implementation Plan Des Moines Creek

    In August 2000, the Port of Seattle submitted a revised implementation plan to the Washington Department of Ecology for a flow augmentation facility on Des Moines Creek, near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The plan outlines two potential water sources — a Port-owned well used to irrigate the Tyce Valley Golf Course, or water purchased from Seattle Public Utilities — along with details on pipeline construction, dechlorination treatment options, and pump configurations. Construction of the facility was scheduled to begin in June 2002, with the well preferred as the lower-cost option pending resolution of water rights issues.
    TagsACC, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, SR509, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-18

    EXH AR027600: Port Of Seattle Letter to Seattle Public Utilities Regarding Des Moines Creek Basin Plan Flow Augmentation Facility

    Letter dated August 18, 2000 from Keith R. Smith, Water Resources Manager at Port Of Seattle (Seattle-Tacoma International Airport), to Jillian Hoyt of Seattle Public Utilities, regarding the Des Moines Creek Basin Plan Flow Augmentation Facility. The Port seeks to purchase water from SPU as an alternate supply for the proposed flow augmentation facility, which
    TagsACC, Des Moines, Des Moines Creek, Des Moines Creek Basin Plan, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2000-08-14

    Exhibit 725: Memorandum on Critical Condition for WER-Related Sampling, Port Of Seattle Third Runway Stormwater Discharge into Miller Creek

    Memorandum from Brian Pippin (Parametrix, Inc.) to Linda Logan (cc: John Brooker), dated August 14, 2000, Project Number 556-2912-001, Port of Seattle WERs. Discusses critical conditions for Water Effect Ratio (WER) sampling per the Permit Writers Manual for the third runway treated stormwater discharge into Miller Creek. Uses HSPF hindcasting over 49-year period to evaluate
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 … Page 48
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Des Moines City Council Briefing Slide on Rejoining StART Process — July 2020" — , 2020

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V