Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagThird Runway(1067)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 411: NHC Letter to US Army Corps Engineers Low Streamflow Analysis Miller Creek Walker Creek Des Moines Creek

    A January 2002 letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis related to Sea-Tac Airport's third runway development. The letter identifies critical flaws in hydrologic modeling of Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks, including double-counting of groundwater discharges, flawed seepage modeling methodology, and failure to account for construction impacts on stream low flows. The consultants argue these errors cause the Port to substantially underestimate the project's negative impacts on local stream flows.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2002-01-30

    EXH 248: NHC Letter to USACE — ACC Technical Review Low Streamflow Analysis, Miller, Walker & Des Moines Creeks

    A January 2002 technical letter from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants challenges the Port of Seattle's December 2001 Low Streamflow Analysis for SeaTac Airport, identifying serious modeling errors that led to underestimated impacts on Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks. Key flaws include double-counting of groundwater discharges in the Miller Creek model, inconsistent methodology for assessing embankment seepage, and failure to account for updated construction methods. The letter was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2002-01-29

    EXH AR004685: ACC’s Reply on Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right for Third Runway § 401 Certification

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply brief filed January 29, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), State of Washington, supporting ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the absence of a water right for the Third Runway Section 401 Water Quality Certification (#1996-4-02325). ACC argues the Port Of Seattle’s Low Flow
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH I: Standing Water on Fill Embankment S 160th St 28 Jan 2002

    This exhibit, part of K.M. Leytham's pre-filed testimony in PCHB No. 01-160, shows photographs taken on January 28, 2002, documenting standing water on top of a fill embankment near South 160th Street. The images provide visual evidence of water pooling conditions on the embankment surface, likely related to construction or environmental concerns associated with Sea-Tac Airport development. This material was submitted as part of a formal hearing record before the Pollution Control Hearings Board.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR026300: Exposed Fill Embankment S 160th St Slope Failure — Layering and Lack of Homogeneity, 28 Jan 2002

    This exhibit, part of K.M. Leytham's pre-filed testimony (PCHB No. 01-160), shows a photograph taken on January 28, 2002, of an exposed fill embankment face near South 160th Street where a slope failure occurred. The image, approximately 4 feet high by 3 feet wide, reveals distinct layering and a lack of uniformity in the fill material. This evidence was submitted in connection with proceedings related to Sea-Tac Airport development and its surrounding infrastructure impacts.
    TagsACC, Fill Dirt, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-28

    EXH AR026431: Absorbent Boom in Stream Below SDS1 Outfall — Turbid Effluent Photos, Jan 28, 2002

    Two photographs taken by P. Willing on January 28, 2002, document an absorbent boom placed in a stream below the SDS1 outfall, a pollution-control measure used to contain contaminants. The second photo highlights turbid (murky) effluent visible in the stream, indicating water quality concerns at the site. These images appear to be part of an environmental monitoring or spill-response record associated with drainage infrastructure near Sea-Tac Airport.
    TagsACC, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 10
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR031469: Review of Third Runway Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan, 401 Certification Condition E.3, Port Of Seattle, November 2001

    Internal memo from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Jeannie Summerhays, Steve Alexander), dated January 23, 2002, reviewing the Port of Seattle’s Embankment Fill Monitoring Plan (EFMP) for the Third Runway, 401 Certification Condition E.3. Comments cover requirements for logic tree flow diagrams for tiered sampling and staged screening (groundwater, seepage), statistical methods for baseline
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 12
  • 2002-01-23

    EXH AR004644: Letter from Michael P. Witek (Helsell Fetterman) to Presiding Officer Cottingham Re: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160, with Wallula Power Project Site Certification Cover Sheet and 50 C.F.R. §402.02

    Letter dated January 23, 2002 from attorney Michael P. Witek of Helsell Fetterman to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port of Seattle, No. 01-160. Transmits two enclosures inadvertently omitted from Exhibit D to the Second Declaration of Michael P. Witek
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-23

    PCHB Doc 4649: Ecology’s Memorandum Opposing ACC’s Application for Certificate of Appealability of the Board’s Order on Motion for Stay

    Washington State Department of Ecology memorandum opposing Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) application for Certificate of Appealability of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Stay Order in PCHB No. 01-160. Ecology argues the Board’s stay of the § 401 Certification for the Third Runway Project (Port of Seattle) is not a ‘final decision’ under RCW 34.05.518
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2002-01-22

    EXH AR019668: Memo Clark to Agid – Summit Ridge Fill Source & Petroleum-Impacted Soil, Third Runway Embankment

    This January 2002 memo from the Port of Seattle describes an environmental incident in which soil from the Summit Ridge fill site in Bellevue, Washington—potentially contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons from a former home heating oil tank—was temporarily placed in the Third Runway embankment during construction. Upon discovery of the contamination in October 2000, the Port halted all haul from the site and removed approximately 1,540 tons of soil, disposing of it at a facility in Everett. The Port subsequently implemented additional environmental safeguards, including full-time on-site supervision, to prevent further transport of impacted soil to the Third Runway.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, soil, Third RunwayFolderBox 09

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 … Page 107
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Modeling variability in air pollution-related health damages from individual airport emissions" — , 2017

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V