Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagSea-Tac Airport(1835)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2019-06-26

    South King County Fund: Port Of Seattle Presentation to StART, June 26, 2019

    The South King County Fund (SKCF) was established by the Port of Seattle Commission on November 27, 2018, to provide resources and support to communities surrounding Sea-Tac Airport. The fund designated $750,000 for 2019, with total funding not to exceed $10 million between 2019 and 2023. This presentation by Environmental Engagement Program Manager Andy Gregory outlines the fund's origins, guiding principles, legal spending boundaries, and community outreach plans.
    Tagscommunity engagement, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, South King County Fund, StARTFolderStART
  • 2019-06-07

    BAC SP2 ABCx2 review of Arlynn Purcell’s presentation to Burien

    A consulting team addresses two community concerns about Seattle-Tacoma International Airport: the lack of a direct NEPA environmental review covering noise impact growth between 2012 and 2018, and questions about how the airport's third runway is being used. The document explains that while current NEPA and Part 150 processes will capture existing noise conditions, they will not specifically compare 2012 versus 2018 impacts, and that federally funded runways like the third runway must be made available whenever air traffic control deems it necessary. The consultants propose reviewing historical Part 150 studies, past NEPA documents, and third-runway records to assess noise impacts on surrounding communities, while also supporting clients in engaging the Port, FAA, and airlines through the StART committee and other channels.
    TagsNEPA, Noise Mitigation, Part 150, SAMP Four City ILA, Sea-Tac Airport, VianairFolderSP #2
  • 2019-06-01

    Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    The City of Burien, Washington contracted with law firm Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP to conduct a joint environmental review of the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), under an Interlocal Agreement signed March 6, 2018, with the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac. The total contract value was $175,000, with each city's share calculated at approximately $1.50 per capita based on population. By June 2019, roughly $70,567 had been billed across five invoices, covering legal services such as environmental assessment modeling review and stakeholder engagement strategy.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • Scannedimage 6.tif pdf
    2019-06-01

    Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    The City of Burien, Washington contracted with law firm Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP to conduct a joint environmental review of the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP), under an Interlocal Agreement signed March 6, 2018, with the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac. The total contract value was $175,000, with each city's share calculated at approximately $1.50 per capita based on population. By June 2019, roughly $70,567 had been billed across five invoices, covering legal services such as environmental assessment modeling review and stakeholder engagement strategy.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • 2019-06-01

    Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    The City of Burien, Washington maintained billing records for a shared consultant contract with Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP to review the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Four cities — Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac — split the $175,000 contract cost based on population, paying roughly $1.50 per capita. As of Invoice #5 (June 2019), a total of approximately $70,567 had been billed, leaving about $104,433 remaining on the contract.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • Scannedimage 5.tif pdf
    2019-06-01

    Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    The City of Burien, Washington maintained billing records for a shared consultant contract with Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP to review the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Four cities — Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac — split the $175,000 contract cost based on population, paying roughly $1.50 per capita. As of Invoice #5 (June 2019), a total of approximately $70,567 had been billed, leaving about $104,433 remaining on the contract.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • 2019-06-01

    City of Burien Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    This document shows billing records for Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP, a law firm hired jointly by the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac to review the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Under a March 2018 interlocal agreement, each city's share of the $175,000 total contract was calculated based on population at approximately $1.50 per capita. Invoice #5, dated June 1, 2019, covers legal work performed in May 2019 totaling $2,750, bringing the cumulative amount billed to roughly $70,567 with about $104,433 remaining on the contract.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • Scannedimage 4.tif pdf
    2019-06-01

    City of Burien Billing Backup for City Shares of Lockridge Grindal Nauen Invoices for Sea-Tac Airport SAMP Review

    This document shows billing records for Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP, a law firm hired jointly by the cities of Burien, Des Moines, Normandy Park, and SeaTac to review the Sea-Tac Airport Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Under a March 2018 interlocal agreement, each city's share of the $175,000 total contract was calculated based on population at approximately $1.50 per capita. Invoice #5, dated June 1, 2019, covers legal work performed in May 2019 totaling $2,750, bringing the cumulative amount billed to roughly $70,567 with about $104,433 remaining on the contract.
    TagsCity of Burien, Interlocal Agreement, Lockridge Grindal Nauen, SAMP, Sea-Tac AirportFolderPDR26-042 Burien
  • 2019-06-01

    Airport basics

    Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), operated by the Port of Seattle, is the eighth busiest U.S. airport, serving 49.8 million passengers and handling over 432,315 metric tons of air cargo in 2018, with 32 airlines offering 91 domestic and 29 international non-stop destinations. The document also profiles Jason Schwartz, an aviation professional with over 25 years of experience specializing in airport noise management, UAS operations, and airside planning, currently serving in dual roles at the Port of Portland and his own consulting firm, Aviation Compatibility Consulting. Schwartz's background includes noise program management, community engagement, and relevant certifications in airport environmental management and business operations.
    TagsEconomic Impacts, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, StatisticsFolderSP #2
  • 2019-06-01

    Delta’s 5-year Seattle hub-iversary: How Delta built a global hub at Sea-Tac

    Delta Air Lines marked its 5-year anniversary of establishing a global hub at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac), highlighting growth from 25 to 53 total destinations, a 129% increase in peak-day departures, and 9% lower fares between June 2014 and June 2019. The airline also expanded its workforce from 2,200 to 3,500 Seattle-based employees and invested in a new 450,000 sq. ft. International Arrivals Facility. This period of rapid growth at Sea-Tac is documented alongside FAA Terminal Area Forecast data projecting continued aviation activity increases through 2045, relevant context for understanding long-term noise impacts at the airport.
    TagsAirport Expansion, Delta, International Arrivals Facility, Sea-Tac AirportFolderSP #1

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 … Page 184
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "North SeaTac Park master plan draft" — , 1992

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V