Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPCHB(607)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 1998-09-14

    EXH AR023654: Draft Internal Email — 401 Water Quality Certs & Stormwater Discharges

    A 1998 internal email from Washington State Department of Ecology staff raises concerns that standard stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) may not provide sufficient water quality treatment to meet state and federal Clean Water Act standards for projects requiring 401 Water Quality Certification. The author warns that issuing 401 certifications while knowingly allowing water quality criteria to go unmet would be legally indefensible, and calls for updated policy guidance, better technical assistance, and clearer requirements for applicants. The email proposes that projects involving waters of the state be held to stricter stormwater treatment standards than upland projects not requiring a 401 certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-09-11

    EXH AR023653: Email – Stormwater Meeting 10/17, 401 Permit & Water Quality Standards

    A 1998 internal email exchange between Washington State environmental officials discusses an urgent regulatory problem that arose during the SeaTac Airport project: stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) were found to be inadequate to meet Water Quality Standards, meaning 401 water quality permits could not legally be issued. The Attorney General's office confirmed that 401 permits cannot be granted when stormwater BMPs fail to meet standards at the discharge point, affecting most permit decisions at the time. Officials urged that the issue be added to the agenda of a September 17, 1998 Stormwater Coordination meeting to begin resolving how to handle 401 permits when stormwater concerns arise.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 1998-08-13

    EXH AR024706: Email Correspondence Metals/Tox Sampling Procedures Storm Water Study

    This August 1998 email exchange between Ken Ludwa and Doug Henderson of Parametrix, Inc. discusses technical procedures for collecting stormwater samples at the Port of Seattle for metals and toxicity testing. Ludwa asks about required sample volumes, filtration timing, bottle preparation, and transfer procedures when using an autosampler during a storm event. Henderson advises that bioassays require 1 gallon and metals testing requires 2 liters, and provides guidance on sample chilling, glassware cleaning, and handling precautions.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1998-07-01

    EXH AR024741: Cost Figures StormFilter System — Email Ludwa to Fendt

    A July 1, 1998 internal email from Ken Ludwa to Paul Fendt outlines preliminary cost estimates for a StormFilter stormwater treatment system, based on a discussion with a VP of Stormwater Management. A 100 cfs system handling approximately 4,700 cartridges would cost roughly $2.3 million to design and build, while an 80 cfs system would cost approximately $1.8 million to build with $150,000 annually for cartridge replacement. Cartridge costs vary depending on total suspended solids (TSS) levels and rainfall, as cartridges are replaced on an as-needed basis.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 1998-06-30

    EXH AR024742: Email — Compost Filter Info for Stormwater Management

    A June 30, 1998 email from John Rogers of CH2M to Thomas Hubbard and Ken Ludwa provides a website link (www.stormwatermgt.com) for a compost filter vendor, noting the company had recently changed its name. Rogers mentions that the vendor would be sending additional product information by overnight mail and water quality data by fax the following day. The correspondence relates to stormwater management and water filtration research being conducted in connection with Port of Seattle operations.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 1998-06-30

    EXH AR024744: Email Ludwa to Kelley with BMP Removal Efficiency Data (Bmps.xls)

    A June 1998 internal email from Ken Ludwa to Jim Kelley includes spreadsheet data comparing removal efficiency percentages for various pollutants—including solids, phosphorus, nitrogen, BOD, iron, lead, zinc, copper, bacteria, and total petroleum hydrocarbons—across multiple published studies from the 1980s and 1990s. The tables compile findings from sources such as Marselek et al. (1996), Metro (1992), and the UW Short Course, and conclude with recommended removal efficiency values for each pollutant category. This document appears to relate to Best Management Practices (BMPs) for stormwater treatment, likely in the context of environmental review for airport-related runoff management.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 1998-04-06

    EXH AR023893: Memo Tappel to Kelley — Minor Edits & Questions, STIA JARPA

    A April 6, 1998 internal memorandum from Paul Tappel to Jim Kelley identifies minor technical inconsistencies and questions in the Sea-Tac Airport JARPA permit application, focusing on discrepancies in engineering drawings, stream buffer widths, channel elevation profiles, and hydraulic calculations for a proposed Miller Creek relocation. Tappel raises concerns that the plan overstates the environmental benefits of the reconstructed creek channel and contains contradictory goals regarding wildlife habitat and airport bird-strike safety. He notes these issues are not critical to the overall assessment but could cause confusion as the design moves forward.
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 1998-01-22

    EXH AR025788: Geotechnical Design Recommendations Phase 1 Embankment Construction Third Runway STIA

    This January 1998 geotechnical engineering report by AGI Technologies provides design recommendations for Phase 1 embankment construction related to the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The report covers site conditions including subsurface soil layers and groundwater, as well as design concepts addressing embankment stability, settlement, and drainage. It was prepared for HNTB Corporation as part of the engineering groundwork for the airport's runway expansion.
    TagsACC, Construction, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway
  • 1997-09-12

    EXH AR023208: Sediment Characterization Hamm Creek Restoration Project Duwamish Turning Basin

    This 1997 report by Science Applications International Corporation characterizes sediment quality in the Duwamish Turning Basin near Seattle, Washington, as part of the Hamm Creek Restoration Project. It presents results from chemical testing, biological bioassays, and sediment sampling to evaluate contaminant levels and compare them against sediment management standards. The study was prepared for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Duwamish River, Environment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Seattle
  • 1997-08-31

    EXH AR025041: Aerial Photographs STIA 1997–1998 — Walker & Associates

    This document contains aerial photographs of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) taken in 1997 and 1998 by Walker & Associates, a photogrammetric and GIS services firm based in Seattle, WA. The images show the airport's runways, taxiways, terminal area, and surrounding residential and commercial neighborhoods from above. Accompanying metadata indicates the 1997 photograph was taken on August 31, 1997, at an approximate print scale of 1 inch equals 2,300 feet, under negative number 1197 SeaTac PP-2.
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac Airport, Third Runway, Walker & Associates

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Flight Corridor Management Program 2026 01 27" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V