Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

Tagenvironmental assessment(30)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2012-11-01

    Final Environmental Assessment for Greener Skies Over Seattle: Proposed Arrival Procedures to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — Volume 2 Appendices

    This November 2012 Federal Aviation Administration report evaluates the environmental impacts of proposed new arrival flight procedures at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, part of the 'Greener Skies Over Seattle' initiative. It includes detailed appendices covering noise modeling, effects of aircraft noise on communities, historic and endangered species considerations, and agency coordination records. The goal of the proposed procedures was to reduce fuel consumption and emissions while assessing changes in noise exposure for surrounding neighborhoods.
    Tagsenvironmental assessment, FAA, Greener Skies, NEPA, NoiseFolderGreener Skies
  • 2012-11-01

    Greener Skies over Seattle: Proposed Arrival Procedures to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport — ICAO Good Practice Case Study

    ICAO good practice case study documenting the US/FAA NextGen ‘Greener Skies over Seattle’ initiative — a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) completed November 1, 2012 for proposed PBN arrival procedures (STARs and RNP with Optimized Profile Descents) at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (KSEA/Sea-Tac Airport). Collaborative project between FAA, Alaska Air Group (Alaska Airlines, Horizon Air), The Boeing
    Tagsenvironmental assessment, FAA, Greener Skies, ICAO, NEPAFolderGreener Skies
  • 2012-10-31

    Draft Environmental Assessment for Greener Skies Over Seattle: Proposed Arrival Procedures to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Volume 2 – Appendices

    FAA Draft Environmental Assessment (EA), Volume 2 Appendices, for the Greener Skies Over Seattle project proposing new arrival procedures to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac Airport / KSEA), dated 31 October 2012. Appendices cover noise metrics (DNL, SEL, Leq, dBA), NIRS noise modeling technical report, aircraft operations and flight tracks, runway utilization, meteorological conditions, historic resource
    Tagsenvironmental assessment, FAA, Greener Skies, NEPA, NoiseFolderGreener Skies
  • 2001-02-01

    EXH AR026134: Guidelines Preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans Environmental Studies

    This Washington State Department of Ecology publication, authored by Stewart M. Lombard and Cliff J. Kirchmer and released in February 2001, provides guidelines for preparing Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) for environmental studies. It outlines standards and procedures to ensure that data collected during environmental investigations meets defined quality and reliability requirements.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environment, environmental assessment, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2000-07-17

    Exhibit 183: Email Chain RE: Proposed Sea-Tac TRACON — Stockdale, Luster, Avolio

    Email chain (AR 018453) among Erik Stockdale, Tom Luster (Ecology, tlus461@ecy.wa.gov), and Michelle Avolio (FAA, Michelle.Avolio@faa.gov) regarding the proposed SeaTac TRACON project. Avolio’s April 17, 2000 email to Luster describes FAA planning for an Environmental Assessment (EA) and Biological Assessment (BA) for DOE review and comment, contact with NMFS regarding EA/BA section contents, and discussions
    TagsACC, Ecology, environmental assessment, FAA, NEPA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, TRACONFolderBox 08
  • 1990-03-27

    Final environmental assessment for proposed changes to air traffic arrival and departure routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 1990 Final Environmental Assessment, prepared by the FAA's Air Traffic Division in Seattle, evaluates proposed changes to arrival and departure flight routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The document was signed by Air Traffic Division Manager Temple H. Johnson, Jr. on March 27, 1990, and examines the potential environmental impacts of rerouting aircraft traffic in and out of Sea-Tac. It serves as an official federal record relevant to noise and environmental policy affecting communities around the airport.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, environmental assessment, FAA, NEPA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFederal
  • 1990-01-01

    Final environmental assessment: Proposed changes to air traffic arrival and departure routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, Volume II

    This 1990 Final Environmental Assessment, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Aviation Administration, examines proposed changes to air traffic arrival and departure routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Volume II of the document compiles public comments received in response to the Draft Environmental Assessment, reflecting community input on how the proposed route changes could affect noise and other environmental conditions in the Seattle, Washington area.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, environmental assessment, FAA, NEPA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFederal
  • 1989-12-01

    Draft Environmental Assessment for Proposed Changes to Air Traffic Arrival and Departure Routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 1989 draft Environmental Assessment, prepared by the FAA's Air Traffic Division, evaluates proposed changes to arrival and departure flight routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The changes aimed to reduce air traffic congestion and improve airspace efficiency, particularly during peak demand periods when south-arrival capacity (42 aircraft/hour) lagged significantly behind north-arrival capacity (56 aircraft/hour). The inefficiency was linked to a requirement routing turbojet aircraft through Elliott Bay, a legacy of noise abatement agreements with local governments and the Port of Seattle dating back to 1970.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, environmental assessment, FAA, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFour Post Plan
  • 1989-12-01

    Draft environmental assessment for proposed changes to air traffic arrival and departure routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    This 1989 FAA draft Environmental Assessment examines proposed changes to arrival and departure flight routes at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, aimed at reducing air traffic congestion and improving airspace efficiency. The document identifies a key inefficiency: during good weather and peak demand, south-landing capacity (42 aircraft/hour) was significantly lower than north-landing capacity (56 aircraft/hour), largely due to a requirement routing turbojet aircraft through Elliott Bay. The assessment traces the issue back to noise abatement procedures established since 1970 that prioritized limiting jet overflights in certain Seattle metropolitan areas over operational efficiency.
    TagsAir Traffic Control, environmental assessment, FAA, Noise Abatement Procedures, Sea-Tac AirportFolderFAA
  • 1979-02-08

    Environmental Assessment and Addendum: File 224-78-R and 210-79-U — Proposed Boeing Corporate Headquarters Facility, Port Of Seattle, February 8, 1979

    This 1979 environmental assessment from King County's Department of Planning & Community Development evaluates the Port of Seattle's application to rezone approximately five acres near Sea-Tac Airport to allow Boeing to build a corporate headquarters facility, including offices, parking, and a heliport. The proposed Phase I development would include a two-story building with roughly 95,000 square feet of office space and parking for 235 cars, with approximately 200 employees on site. The document also outlines the county's land use history and ordinances governing development on the west side of Sea-Tac Airport, emphasizing protections for adjacent residential neighborhoods.
    Tags224-78-R, Boeing HQ, environmental assessment, King County, Port Of SeattleFolderProposed Boeing HQ 1978

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Stay Grounded Event: Night trains, not night planes!
    Add to CalendarMSunday Sep 13: 12:00am
    Ntnnp social media3

    For the past two years, more than 220 initiatives from 15 countries have declared September 13th as the International day for the ban of night flights at airports. In parallel, activists across Europe have been gathering for pyjama parties for night trains – coordinated in 2024 and 2025 by Back on Track and Stay Grounded.

    [...]
  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Briefing 2024 local, regional and community engagement policy priorities" — , 2024

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V