Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagAirport Communities Coalition(279)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-05-11

    EXH AR021429: Columbia Analytical Services Letter to ACC — Water/Sediment Quality Monitoring Results, SR K2002882

    A May 2000 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services, Inc. presents water and sediment quality monitoring results for the Airport Communities Coalition in Richland, Washington. Samples were collected on April 19, 2000, and analyzed for metals, ammonia, pesticides, semivolatile organics, and other contaminants as part of project OO-101G. Two samples arrived broken and unusable, and one sediment sample showed elevated background components affecting Toxaphene reporting limits, though no major anomalies were found in the remaining analyses.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Water QualityFolderBox 09
  • 2000-05-03

    Exhibit 231: Follow-Up Comments by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants on Stormwater Management Plan for Proposed Third Runway at Sea-Tac Airport

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants submitted follow-up technical comments in May 2000 raising serious concerns about flawed stormwater modeling used to assess the impact of a proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The consultants identified major inconsistencies in soil-type assumptions and runoff parameters in the hydrologic models, concluding that the Stormwater Management Plan's predictions of detention facility performance were unreliable and required a complete overhaul. The letter also flagged a lack of adequate local regulatory oversight to ensure that Port of Seattle stormwater designs complied with King County surface water standards.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-05-03

    Exhibit AR018931: NHC Follow-Up Comments on Stormwater Management Plan for Proposed Third Runway Development at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    A technical review by Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology in May 2000, raises serious concerns about the stormwater management plan for Seattle-Tacoma International Airport's proposed third runway. The report identifies major flaws in the hydrologic modeling used to assess drainage impacts, including inconsistent soil-type assumptions and unreliable flow predictions for Miller Creek. The consultants call for a complete overhaul of the modeling process, independent technical review, and clearer regulatory oversight of the Port of Seattle's stormwater design work.
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 1999-11-15

    City of Des Moines, et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council, et al.

    Court of Appeals of Washington,Division 1. The CITY OF DES MOINES, The City of Burien, The City of Federal Way, The City of Normandy Park, The City of Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and The Airport Communities Coalition, Appellants, v. The PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL, The Executive Board of the Puget Sound Regional Council,
    CategoriesLitigation TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third Runway
  • 1999-09-08

    ACC: Letter to the Editor: It’s never too late to save over a billion dollars in public funds

      City of Burien City of Tukwila City of Des Moines City of Federal Way City of Normandy Park Highline School District AIRPORT COMMUNITIES COALITION September 8, 1999 To the Editor: It’s never too late to save over a billion dollars in public funds. It’s not too late to ease freeway gridlock. And it’s not
    CategoriesFrom The Web, History TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Third Runway
  • 1999-02-16

    1999 Legislative Services Contract: ACC and Smith Alling Lane

    Cover letter dated February 16, 1999 from Robert E. Mack of Smith Alling Lane P.S. (Tacoma, WA) to Lisa Logie, Executive Director of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), transmitting a revised 1999 Legislative Services Contract for signature by Robert Sheckler, Chair of the ACC Executive Committee, along with an L1 Lobbyist Registration form. The contract,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Lobbyists, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderACC
  • 1998-11-24

    EXH AR041830: City of Normandy Park et al. v. Port Of Seattle and Federal Aviation Administration, 165 F.3d 35 (9th Cir. 1998)

    Unpublished Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals memorandum opinion, 165 F.3d 35 (1998 WL 833628), affirming the FAA Administrator’s approval of the Master Plan development project for Sea-Tac Airport expansion. Petitioners — City of Normandy Park, City of Des Moines, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Tukwila, and Highline School District No. 401
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Air Act, FAA, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 17
  • 1998-07-09

    EXH AR041629: Memorandum Ruling on Application of WAC Ch. 365-195

    King County Superior Court Memorandum Ruling by Judge Robert H. Alsdorf on Application of WAC Chapter 365-195 (Procedural Criteria for Adopting Comprehensive Plans and Development Regulations) in consolidated cases No. 96-2-20357-2 KNT, No. 97-2-13908-2 KNT, No. 97-2-22276-1 KNT, No. 98-2-04911-1 KNT. City of Des Moines, Airport Communities Coalition, and other plaintiff-petitioners argued against the Port
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, City Of Des Moines, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCW, WACFolderBox 17
  • 1998-07-01

    EXH AR041639: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Final Order — City of Des Moines et al. v. Port Of Seattle et al.

    King County Superior Court Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Final Order by Judge Robert H. Alsdorf in consolidated cases No. 96-2-20357-2 KNT, No. 97-2-13908-2 KNT, No. 97-2-22276-1 KNT, No. 98-2-04911-1 KNT. Challenges Port Of Seattle Resolutions 3212 and 3245 approving the Sea-Tac Master Plan Update including construction of a third runway at Seattle-Tacoma
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines, EIS, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac AirportFolderBox 17
  • 1998-06-11

    Documents catalogued as received in 1996

    This catalog lists documents received in 1996 related to Seattle-Tacoma International Airport planning and policy, including environmental impact statements, noise arbitration hearing transcripts, air quality studies, and budget documents. Key sources include the Port of Seattle, the FAA, the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), and various consulting firms, covering topics such as the proposed Sea-Tac Master Plan Update, a third runway, groundwater studies, and community noise mitigation. The collection reflects ongoing disputes between the Port of Seattle and surrounding communities over airport expansion impacts during the mid-1990s.
    TagsAirport Communities Coalition, Environmental Impact Statement, Expert Arbitration Panel, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Sea-Tac Master Plan Update 1996FolderRCAA

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V