TagThird Runway(1067)

This internal engineering memo from Jamie Beaver to Mike Bailey, dated March 9, 2001, outlines the process used to determine subgrade improvement zones for a 3R embankment stability project. The analysis focused on liquefaction risks, using post-liquefaction undrained residual shear strength (PLURSS) values derived from seismic reanalysis, ultimately recommending improvement zone widths of 100–120 feet depending on location. The memo notes that factors of safety for the liquefaction and pseudo-static cases generally ranged from 1.0 to 1.2 across various zones.

Draft meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider, Floyd & Snider Inc., from a March 9, 2001 management meeting on the 401 permit decision-making process for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway. Attendees include Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port of Seattle), David Masters (King County), and Floyd & Snider

Memorandum dated March 9, 2001, from Dave Garland, Ecology NWRO Water Quality Nonpoint Unit, to Kevin Fitzpatrick and Ann Kenny, reviewing the Earth Tech December 2000 report ‘Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Low Streamflow Analysis.’ The memo evaluates HSPF streamflow modeling and supplemental analyses for Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek in connection

Memorandum dated March 9, 2001 from Dave Garland, Washington Department of Ecology NWRO Water Quality Nonpoint Unit, to Kevin Fitzpatrick and Ann Kenny, reviewing Earth Tech’s December 2000 ‘Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Low Streamflow Analysis’ (Exhibit 2099, AR 033695–033697). The memo evaluates HSPF streamflow modeling for Miller Creek, Walker Creek, and Des Moines Creek

A March 9, 2001 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, representing the Airport Communities Coalition (cities of Burien, Des Moines, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, and the Highline School District), demands that Washington State Department of Ecology enforce a 1999 Agreed Order requiring the Port of Seattle to complete groundwater contamination studies at Sea-Tac Airport. The coalition argues that the Port has failed to finish required groundwater flow and contaminant transport studies — originally due December 1999 — and that Ecology cannot legally certify the third runway project under the Clean Water Act without this data. The letter also requests a State Auditor review of how the Port spent grant money provided by Ecology to fund those studies.

Final draft meeting notes from March 9, 2001 (11:00–3:00) for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway, prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. Attendees included Ray Hellwig, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Ann Kenny (Dept. of Ecology), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port of Seattle), David Masters (King County), and Floyd & Snider

A March 8, 2001 laboratory report from Columbia Analytical Services sent to John Strand of the Airport Communities Coalition in Richland, WA, presents water quality monitoring results (project 00-101B) from samples submitted on February 20, 2001. The report includes standard data qualifiers and acronym definitions used to interpret inorganic, metals, and organic analytical results. All analyses were conducted under the laboratory's quality assurance program.

Draft memorandum dated March 5, 2001 from Douglas Lindquist E.I.T., Barry Chen PhD P.E., and Michael Bailey P.E. of Hart Crowser Inc. to Jim Thomson P.E. of HNTB, project J-4978-30. Presents revised methods and results of liquefaction analyses for the SeaTac Third Runway embankment, based on revised probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) and one-dimensional site

In March 2001, GeoSyntec Consultants submitted a correction to a technical review letter concerning the Third Runway Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, clarifying that the seismic stability analysis used by Hart Crowser may seriously overestimate—not underestimate—the wall's ability to withstand earthquake loads. The firm argued that analyzing only the failure surface with the lowest static safety factor, rather than independently searching for the critical seismic failure surface, is an incorrect methodology. GeoSyntec recommended a proper pseudo-static slope stability analysis to ensure adequate ground improvement measures are applied in the right areas.

In a March 2001 email exchange, Paul Fendt responds to Ken Ludwa regarding specific information requests related to TESC (Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control) facilities, calling the level of detail requested 'absurd.' The information requests from Ludwa included clearing limits, tributary areas for ESC facilities, pump sizes, power supply specifications, spill prevention plans, and the expected duration of temporary facilities. The document appears to be part of an administrative record related to construction or environmental control planning at or near Sea-Tac Airport.