TagSea-Tac Communities Plan(236)

It was with considerab~le interest that I read your recent letter to the editor regarding FAA density guide l ines and the Sea-Tac Communities'Plan for the runway approach . This was a good letter, with your poi nts being wel l taken . If ever I can be of any assistance to you, please feel f ree to call upon me. j s Sincerely, G~~UTM Phil Tal madge State Senator 34th District REPRF SENTING THE 341 H lEGISlATIVE DISTRICT Clear zone ru~les hav se ' It is disturbing to bear that there are residents within our conununlty who seem to feel that the land north of Sea-Tac Airport BELONGS to them. The area was designated in the early 70s as the Interim Land Acquisition , and now is being called the " propos- ed" North Sea-Tac Park. For those who have forgotten, the homes in this area were pur- chased by the Port of Seattle to remove the people from an en- vironmentally unacceptable neighborhood. High noise was causing Wlhappy people and in- numerable law suits. The POS made the statement that the land was not fit for residential use under any circumstances. However, the FAA stated from the beginning that the acquisition was to provide safety areas for Sea-Tac Airport. At the same time they also said that if Sunset Junior High School was purchas- ed with federal participation then they would not allow such a use to continue. The Port now owns most of the land, with the…

The STCP is the PLAN adopted by the Port of Seattle and King County. The major th1~st of that PLAN addresses the airport and its noise impacted areas. The Policy Advisory Committee is the group that monitors the PLAN. It is critical that the Port of Seattle and King County understand the needs of those most affected by the PLAN - therefore I would urge that the citizen representatives in that committee come from the noise impacted areas. Sincerely, &J~~~~-tv-JL John Jovanovich State Representative 31st District cc: Virginia Davis JJ:lm FOaTY -S1XTI1 LEG1SlA TURE 1979-10 l.J

Meeting agenda for the Policy Advisory Committee of the Sea-Tac/Communities Plan, a joint effort between the Port of Seattle and King County. The meeting covers committee reorganization, Sea-Tac Westside developments, King County capital improvement projects, and noise remedy programs.

1. Long-t e: r m won i torin r, .:-mel overv iew of Se a-Tac Plan impl c::-.c.1t,nt:i ·cn :.:. __ ,,. '.: 2. Deal with speci al i ss~ c s aDd proLlemG 3. PAC mske s recom.TTien da. t i ons to Kin g Coun ::y Executive · and t he Council, Execat ::.vc Director and the Port o f Sea ttle Corr.mi ss ion 4. PAC should he able to initiate ac tior.s/recom;:;endations r ~;- : ca pi tal pro gr aF:S Composil i.o;; of the Fol i c •,.; lldvi.su r·: Comr;;itte e Repre s 0ntativ0 fro~ K~ng Cou~ ty Representativ e selected by Board o f P.J .C. Rep resent a tive s f r o!" the Po1:: of Se at tle (Av j,ation a n d Flan~ing a~J Research Departmen ts) Rep re s ~ nt a t ive f ran loca l bus jn e s~ * - ------· .. - ---· ~- 978 ~ -: - ----- --- ~ ;.---·· --·- ~-------~--:-- ~---- (rep r es~nting Buri e.:;t Cha:::-,:--er of Con:Dt. rc .-:; , De s Hoine f: C o f C an d "th(;. s L.r i.~ " ) ~should live i n area and s hould be selected by a . gra up cee ting Repre sen t ai: ive from the P.i;h line School Distr ic t Represen t a t ive fr o:-:1 loc a.l goYe rnrr,c nt * (rcpreser.ting De s !·k·ine s, Tuh.'i l a ,…

a new zone consistent with the Sea-Tac Communities Plan open space policies; adding a new chapter to Title 21; and adding a definition to Chapter 21.04 K.C.C. SECTION 1. Purpose. The principal purpose to be served by the Airport Open Use (AOU) classification and its application is to permit economic uses and development of areas affected by major airports which are compatible with neighboring residential areas, designated open space areas, and airport clear zone requirements. SECTION 2. Permitted Uses. In the AOU zone the folloHing uses are permitted as hereinafter specifically provided and allowed by this chapter, subject to the off-street parking requirements and the general provisions and exceptions set forth in this title beginning with Chapter 21.46. (1) Accessory buildings and uses customarily incidental to any of the uses permitted or conditionally permitted in this chapter, except dwelling units, when located on the same site as the principal use. (2) Signs, provided that: (a) No free-standing sign shall exceed fifty square feet per face, not to exceed two faces per sign. (b) Any sign shall be used exclusively to advertise a business conducted, services rendered, goods produced or sold upon the premisP.s, or any other lawful activity conducted upon such premises, or to identify permitted uses; (c) One sign per permitted use shall be allowed when n mounted flush with a permitted building, not above the roof line~ Such signs shall not exceed fifty sq~are fe~t. {d) Any lighted sign shall be stationary and nonflashing. Lights shall be directed…

A. Sea-Tac Communities Plan initiates this kind of effort. (3) B. Very positive action must be taken to assure continuance of a Sea-Tac Communities Plan format after the study is completed. (3) c. (9) 2. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE ON ALL PORT ACTIVI- TIES, INCLUDING AIRPORT OPERATIONS AND HARBOR DEVELOPMENT. (35) A. Somewhat in effect at present, but no formalized action has been taken by the Port in the past. Work directly with the community. A new Director of Community Affairs has been named. This question also relates to capital improvement schedules. (3) B. The continued improvements in this area are desirable. (3) c. (9) 3. THE IMMEDIATE COMMUNITIES SHOULD BE KEPT BRIEFED AND BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE IN ALL DEVELOPMENT AT THE AIRPORT. (36) A. Public input to the planning process is essential for com- patible development. EIS also requires public input prior to project acceptance. This is technically feasible, and is in effect now in relation to the Sea-Tac Communities Plan. (3) B. (3) c. (9) 4. THERE SHOULD BE MORE COMMUNITY USE OF THE TERMINAL AREAS. (34) A. Traffic access and limited facilities could pose problems, but services such as restaurants, lounges and shops would welcome additional business. Relates to more community use. This is an objective of the study. (3) B. This was generally viewed as desirable. (3) c. (9) / ... / 5. A RE-STRUCTURING OF TAX ALLOCATIONS SHOULD BE EXAMINED, SO SOME OF THE LEASEHOLD TAX WOULD GO TO THE LOCAL SCHOOL…

AN ORDINANCE adopting the Sea-Tac Conununi tie~ PJab; !·as an addendum to the King County Comprehens;ive I i Plan for the future growth, development and rede- 1 ' ,,,velopment of· Sea-Tac International Airport apd ~he1 surrounding communi ties, , I ! S'FAT~MENT OF' FACTS: . I i 1. The King County Council passed Motion 1019 on NoVi ember 27, ~972, authorizing King County to apply for Federa:l 1 ' . Aviation Administration Planning ·Grant Funds with th~ . Por.t :.of Seattle to conduct ·master pl.nnirtg :for Se~~T~c 1 • ·International Airport and the _surrounding vicinity .. J i 2.. 'fhe application was approved by the Federal A:Viatti):n Administration for a sum of $641,468 on January 28, ~973'_,, .. • I I' "· ' ', I I • I '! i '. 3. The contracted and in- kind portions of that gran'tl ~ave been! satisfactorily accomplisbed. . j !'' ! 4. Community involvement was a: thorough ·and conttnu~·ng! · elf:'ment of the Sea-Tac Communi~ies Plan as certif'ied jby the ~ing. County Policy Development Commission and: doeu·h ment~d in their report "Report ·on Community Invol;vemdnt: in the sea-Tac C~unities Planning Process.!' ! I ! ' . . I' • I 5. King· County has considerable land use controlj in the . :i~~~~~~;lned as_ the vicinity of ~e~-Tac Internatilonalll i i , I 6. ~n Environmental Impact· Statement has· been pr'epaljed: which examines the effects of the Sea-Tac Communilties ! ' Plani · .. I 1 . . • I : .7. The…