Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1531)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-11-30

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order Granting Intervention — CASE in ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (§ 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Intervention in case PCHB 01-160, allowing Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion (CASE) to intervene as appellant in the appeal filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) challenging § 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (amended-1) issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to the Port of Seattle on August 10, 2001 (re-issued
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-30

    PCHB Doc 5853: Order Granting Intervention (Proposed) — CASE in ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed Order Granting Intervention filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board case PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Washington State Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Order grants the Motion to Intervene by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) as a party-intervenor. Presented by Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C., attorney Richard A. Poulin, WSBA #27782.
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-28

    EXH AR005862: ACC’s Reply on Motion to Supplement the Record on Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC’s reply brief filed November 28, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) opposing Port Of Seattle’s response to ACC’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Motion for Stay. ACC argues that Kelly Whiting (King County engineer under interagency contract with Ecology) sent
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-28

    EXH AR005864: Third Declaration of William A. Rozeboom Relating to ACC’s Motion for Stay

    Third declaration of William A. Rozeboom, professional civil engineer with Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Declaration concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement. Rozeboom identifies significant technical deficiencies
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-27

    EXH AR052548: Sea-Tac Third Runway Embankment Fill Modeling in Support of Low Streamflow Analysis

    Report by Pacific Groundwater Group (project JE0105) prepared for Port Of Seattle, dated November 27, 2001, analyzing embankment fill modeling in support of low streamflow analysis for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. Uses HYDRUS-SLICE modeling to assess vertical infiltration through embankment fill materials (General Fill and Type 1 Fill), saturated flow beneath the fill, and effective
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Walker Creek Basin PlanFolderBox 22
  • 2001-11-26

    PCHB 01-160: Order on Motion to Reconsider Motion to Strike — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) order in PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. On reconsideration of the October 10, 2001 order granting Ecology’s motion to strike, the Board addresses inadvertent disclosure of an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by Ecology NW Regional Director Ray
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR005903: Port Of Seattle’s Response to ACC’s Motion to Supplement PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion to supplement the record in PCHB Case No. 01-160, filed November 26, 2001. Port argues ACC’s hearsay emails and Keith Smith letter regarding revisions to the Low Streamflow Analysis do not warrant supplementing the record on the motion to stay. Document addresses HSPF groundwater model
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH 300: Third Declaration Paul S. Fendt — ACC v. Ecology, PCHB No. 01-160

    This legal declaration by stormwater engineer Paul S. Fendt, filed before Washington's Pollution Control Hearings Board, addresses the Port of Seattle's Master Plan Update and its potential impacts on local stream flows in Miller, Walker, and Des Moines Creeks near Sea-Tac Airport. Fendt explains the use of the HSPF hydrologic model and a 2-year, 7-day low flow standard to assess and mitigate summer streamflow impacts resulting from planned airport expansion projects. He concludes that revised analysis shows no significant changes to previously calculated low flow impacts.
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-11-26

    EXH AR017588: Northwest Hydraulic Consultants Letter to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regarding Port Of Seattle Low Flow Mitigation, Third Runway

    Letter dated November 26, 2001, from Northwest Hydraulic Consultants (on behalf of ACC, Airport Communities Coalition) to Colonel Ralph H. Graves, Ms. Muffy Walker, and Ms. Gail Terzi of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Corps Ref. No. 1996-4-02325. Identifies serious flaws in Port Of Seattle’s low flow mitigation analysis for Miller Creek, Walker
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-11-26

    PCHB No. 01-160: Declaration of Roger A. Pearce, Port Of Seattle Attorney, Re Wetland and Groundwater Mitigation Documents

    Declaration by Roger A. Pearce, attorney for Port Of Seattle, filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Identifies four exhibits submitted to Washington Department of Ecology under amended §401 Certification on JARPA Application No. 1996-4-02325: Exhibit A (Wetland A17 Restoration Plan,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 03

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Burien Airport Committee Meeting September 15, 2026
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Sep 15: 6:00pm
    400 SW 152nd St, Burien, WA 98166
    Burien airport committee 15 sep 2026 agenda pdf pdf

    a) Part 150 Noise Study (Emily Inlow-Hood) — 15 minutes
    b) SAMP Update and Next Steps (Brian Davis and Sarah Moore) — 15 minutes
    c) Legislative Updates — 10 minutes
       • SCA (Sarah Moore)
       • Work with Sen. Orwall (Brian Davis)
    d) StART Reorganization (Jeff Harbaugh and Karen Veloria) — 10 minutes

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Ep #14 A-Weighted" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V