Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPCHB(607)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006525: Port Of Seattle Motion to Shorten Time — ACC Overlength Brief, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion to shorten time filed October 9, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle requests expedited consideration of its accompanying Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, arguing ACC filed an overlength response memorandum on
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006527: Order Shortening Time — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed Order Shortening Time filed by respondent Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. The Pollution Control Hearings Board, presided by Kaleen Cottingham, grants Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Shorten Time to consider the Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief. Presented
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006529: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief filed October 9, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle argues ACC filed a 46-page reply memorandum exceeding the Board-ordered 30-page limit by more than 16 pages, violating WAC
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006468: Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents filed by State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology seeks to strike privileged communications inadvertently disclosed to ACC via public disclosure request relating
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public Records
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006548: Second Declaration of James C. Kelley, Ph.D. — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Second Declaration of James C. Kelley, Ph.D., professional ecologist with Parametrix, Inc., filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Kelley addresses §401 Certification Condition D1g requiring bi-monthly wetland monitoring downslope of the Third Runway embankment fill at
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007036: Declaration of Dr. Patrick Lucia in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration by Dr. Patrick Lucia, Principal at GeoSyntec Consultants, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Challenges Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001 (Amended-1), by Washington State Department
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007119: Declaration of William A. Rozeboom in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of William A. Rozeboom filed October 8, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001. Rozeboom
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007189: Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon in Support of ACC’s Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Declaration of Dyanne Sheldon, environmental scientist and wetland ecologist, filed in support of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Motion for Stay before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, against State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 007256: Declaration of Dr. John Strand in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Dr. John Strand, Principal Biologist for Columbia Biological Assessments, filed in PCHB cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion to stay Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) issued by Washington Department of Ecology for USACOE Public Notice 1996-4-02325 regarding Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Strand addresses metals exceedances — copper,
    TagsACC, Miller Creek, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 7302: Declaration of Dr. Peter Willing in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration by Dr. Peter Willing submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed in support of ACC’s reply on motion for stay regarding Section 401 Water Quality
    TagsACC, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway, Water Quality

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 … Page 61
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Part 150 Study-Draft Working Paper One July 1998" — , 1998

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V