Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPCHB(607)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-10

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Order on Motion to File Overlength Briefs — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order in case PCHB 01-160, signed by Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham on October 10, 2001. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed a motion requesting permission to file an overlength reply brief simultaneously with the filing of the lengthy reply itself, in violation of an earlier order and stipulation. The Board reluctantly
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-10

    PCHB 01-160: Order on Ecology’s Motion to Strike — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order on Motion to Strike in case PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology moved to strike references to an attorney-client privileged briefing paper prepared by NW Regional Director Ray Hellwig for a senior management team meeting in April
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-10

    EXH AR006426: ACC’s Reply on Motion to File Overlength Reply Brief — PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) reply brief filed with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, opposing Ecology and Port of Seattle objections to ACC’s motion to file an overlength reply brief. Concerns Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001 as No.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006468: Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Motion to Strike Attorney-Client Privileged Documents filed by State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology seeks to strike privileged communications inadvertently disclosed to ACC via public disclosure request relating
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public RecordsFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006649: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Request to File an Overlength Reply Brief

    Department of Ecology response in opposition to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) request to file an overlength reply brief in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, filed October 9, 2001. Ecology, represented by Assistant Attorneys General Joan M. Marchioro (WSBA #19250) and Thomas J. Young (WSBA #17366), joins Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike ACC’s
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006473: Declaration of Ray Hellwig in Support of Motion to Strike — PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration by Ray Hellwig, Regional Director at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, filed October 9, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Hellwig declares that he inadvertently disclosed to ACC, pursuant to a public disclosure request under RCW 42.17.310(1)(i),
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Public RecordsFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006655: Second Declaration of Erik Stockdale — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Second Declaration of Erik Stockdale, filed October 9, 2001, in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) cases No. 01-133 and 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Stockdale responds to ACC reply brief on motion for stay, asserting hydrologic monitoring has commenced downgradient of the embankment at
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006525: Port Of Seattle Motion to Shorten Time — ACC Overlength Brief, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle motion to shorten time filed October 9, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle requests expedited consideration of its accompanying Motion to Strike Overlength Brief, arguing ACC filed an overlength response memorandum on
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006527: Order Shortening Time — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Proposed Order Shortening Time filed by respondent Port Of Seattle in PCHB case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. The Pollution Control Hearings Board, presided by Kaleen Cottingham, grants Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Shorten Time to consider the Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief. Presented
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-09

    EXH AR006529: Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Strike Overlength Brief filed October 9, 2001 in Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Port Of Seattle argues ACC filed a 46-page reply memorandum exceeding the Board-ordered 30-page limit by more than 16 pages, violating WAC
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 … Page 61
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V