Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagModel Toxics Control Act(34)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 03040: Direct Testimony of Chung Ki Yee on Behalf of Ecology — ACC/CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Chung Ki Yee, Environmental Engineer 3 in the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Yee describes deriving fill criteria for the Port Of Seattle Third
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 02
  • 2001-12-19

    EXH AR017502: Guidance for the Use of Tables — Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and PQL Comparisons to Method B Cleanup Levels

    Ecology guidance document (AR017502, Part II of IV) explaining how to use PQL and MDL tables under the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). Covers Practical Quantitation Limits (PQLs), Method Detection Limits (MDLs), and comparisons to MTCA Method B cleanup levels for water and soil. Describes analytical methods from US EPA SW-846 (3000, 7000, 8000-8100, 8310,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Scientific Measurement, WACFolderBox 08
  • 2001-12-11

    EXH AR019740: Hart Crowser Letter to Ecology — Professional & Owner/Agency Certification, NE 4th St & 108th Ave, Bellevue

    In December 2001, Hart Crowser, Inc. submitted Washington State Department of Revenue forms to the Department of Ecology certifying an environmental remedial action at a property located at the corner of NE 4th Street and 108th Avenue in Bellevue, King County. The Professional Certification was signed by Matthew F. Schultz, P.E., confirming that the cleanup was conducted independently and in a manner consistent with Washington's Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA). The filing sought a Washington State sales tax exemption and business and occupation tax credit for the environmental remedial action project (J-7600000).
    TagsACC, Department of Revenue, Ecology, King County, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 09
  • 2001-09-26

    PCHB Doc 01-133: Declaration of Pete Kmet — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Declaration of Pete Kmet, senior environmental engineer in Ecology’s Toxics Cleanup Program, filed in PCHB No. 01-133 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Kmet clarifies his June 27, 2001 response to Kevin Fitzpatrick (Water Quality Program) regarding terrestrial ecological risk language for the Clean Water Act §
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Model Toxics Control Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH 2237 (AR 034850): Workbook Tools Calculating Soil & Groundwater Cleanup Levels MTCA — User’s Guide

    This 2001 User's Guide from the Washington State Department of Ecology explains how to use spreadsheet workbook tools (MTCASGL and MTCATPH) to calculate soil and groundwater cleanup levels under the Model Toxics Control Act. The guide covers how to enter site-specific data—such as chemical properties, exposure parameters, and hydrogeological characteristics—to determine safe contamination thresholds. It is intended for environmental cleanup professionals working on hazardous substance remediation in Washington State.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, State of WashingtonFolderBox 14
  • 2001-08-01

    EXH AR019520: Workbook Tools Calculating Soil & Groundwater Cleanup Levels MTCA User’s Guide

    This 2001 User's Guide from the Washington State Department of Ecology describes software workbook tools (MTCASGL and MTCATPH) designed to help calculate soil and ground water cleanup levels under the Model Toxics Control Act. The guide covers installation, technical requirements, and step-by-step instructions for entering site-specific data such as chemical properties, exposure parameters, and hydrogeological characteristics. Note that while this document addresses environmental cleanup standards, it does not appear to be directly related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soilFolderBox 09
  • 2001-07-05

    EXH 373: Letter John Strand Columbia Biological Assessments to USACE Ecology Airfield Project Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria Black River Quarry TPH Contamination

    A July 2001 letter from environmental consultant John Strand raises concerns that the Port of Seattle accepted chemically contaminated soil fill for the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Testing revealed petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in soil from Black River Quarry that exceeded cleanup standards, yet the Port transferred the soil to the airport anyway and delayed reporting the results. The letter argues that the Port's Soil Fill Acceptance Criteria are seriously flawed and that approving the project under the Clean Water Act would be ill-advised.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Model Toxics Control Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 2043: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification and Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Memo dated June 22, 2001 from Ching-Pi Wang (Toxics Cleanup Program, TCP) to Ann Kenny regarding TCP recommendations for 401 certification related to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Three recommendations: (1) Port of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant transport to soil and groundwater via
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 12
  • 2001-06-13

    EXH AR017301: Email on Acceptable Fill Criteria Language for Draft 401 Certification — MTCA Requirements for Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Internal deliberative email from Chung K. Yee to Kevin Fitzpatrick (cc: Craig E. Thompson, Curtis A. Dahlgren, Tim Nord), dated June 13, 2001, regarding acceptable fill criteria language for the Draft 401 Certification for the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Third Runway project. Pete Kmet of HQ/TCP recommended MTCA (Model Toxics Control Act) should not be used
    TagsACC, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-05-01

    Model Toxics Control Act Cleanup Regulation: Process for Cleanup of Hazardous Waste Sites

    This Washington State Department of Ecology fact sheet explains how the Model Toxics Control Act (Initiative 97, 1989) governs the cleanup of hazardous waste sites in Washington, outlining who is liable, how sites are identified, and the options available for conducting cleanups. Potentially liable parties — including past and present owners, operators, and those who transported or disposed of hazardous substances — may clean up sites independently or work cooperatively with Ecology through formal agreements such as consent decrees. Note: this document concerns hazardous waste site cleanup regulation and does not contain information related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsEcology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, RCW, WACFolderEcology

Posts pagination

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V