TagHandwritten Notes(34)

Handwritten meeting notes dated February 19, 2002, AR 026595–026597, attended by Pony Ellingson, Joe Brascher, Paul Fendt, Keith Smith, Felix Kristandovitch, Nick Stackellburg, Kelly Whiting, Ray Helwig, and Ed Abbasi. Topics include embankment model (Figure 5-4, Appendix B, Slice I model, MSE wall, infinite permeability assumption, coarse fill), fill modeling footprint area with surface groundwater

These are handwritten field observation notes dated January 31, 2002, documenting wetland and upland buffer conditions near Miller Creek and Vacca Farm, including plant communities, wetland boundaries, and buffer zones. The notes reference site observations about existing wetland conditions, vegetation types (including cattails, alder, sedge, and Phalaris), and questions about the extent of wetland fill and excavation. The observations appear to relate to an environmental review of proposed land use changes adjacent to Miller Creek, with reference to an upland buffer plan (STA-7805).

This document, marked as Leytham Exhibit 222 (dated 2/11/02), contains a hand-drawn diagram illustrating flow rate over time, showing the relationship between minute and hourly measurements alongside an infiltration capacity curve. The sketch plots flow rate on the vertical axis against time intervals (15, 30, 45, 60 minutes) on the horizontal axis, with a shaded area indicating peak flow. It appears to be a technical exhibit related to stormwater or drainage analysis presented in proceedings concerning Sea-Tac Airport policy.

Handwritten field observation notes by R. Azous (Azous Exhibit 387, dated 2-19-02) transmitted via fax from Helsell Fetterman LLP on 02-19-2002, documenting site visits to Vacca Farm and West Side areas adjacent to Miller Creek and STIA. Notes cover wetland conditions, plant communities (cattail, alder, Juncus, Phalaris, Sparganium, sedge), upland buffer zones, NRM planting plan

A November 6, 2001 handwritten fax note discusses problems with noise modeling errors and how results will be integrated into legal policies. It notes that AK advised POS to produce a more complete and accurate document, and argues it is not reasonable to hold up port mitigation based on a mistake, stating that if there is no impact, there is no impact. The note also references consultant agreement on impact calculations and requirements related to 401 regulations submitted as group per FAA standards.

Meeting notes from Erik Stockdale discuss wetland monitoring activities, including monthly groundwater sampling, continuous recorders at drainage channels, and vegetation mapping. Topics covered include hydrology monitoring changes, performance standards for hydrological discharge, and sampling schedules running bi-monthly from November through May. The notes reference coordination among multiple parties regarding soil sampling, data thresholds, and revised performance standards.

Exhibit AR017854 from Hellwig exhibit collection (Exhibit No. 103, dated 1-8-02, M. Green). Phone message slip dated 8/28 at 2:50 from Joan Mpichoro (or similar) to Ray, noting a letter from the Board setting a hearing for March 18-29, 2002, with a please-call-back request. Accompanying handwritten notes dated 8-27-01 cover questions and ideas including: 4POS

Handwritten notes dated 7/31/01 from Kelly Whiting discuss water quality treatment options for a downstream area, referencing NEPL and CARBO systems with treatment rates of 40% and 10% respectively. The notes cover spill containment and oil management considerations, including gravity oil-water separators and spill containment vaults upstream. A follow-up note from 7/31/01 indicates water quality issues will have comments, with discussion of impact numbers from a 7/23 report.

Handwritten Record of Telecon dated 7-27-01, call from Kelly Whiting (KCI), subject: low flow — Wetland 44a. Notes state no water coming from the drain to south, cut not fill on runway, third-way model over-estimated flow; Parametrix modeled at 2200; 11,000-foot estimate; embankment will provide flow except where lined; flows feeding 44a are not meeting

Meeting notes from 2-26-01 discuss a new CFM proposal for Walker that may significantly increase storage requirements and affect SMP design feasibility, potentially impacting NRMP. Key concerns include the need to understand design feasibility and impacts, with discussion of resizing UDP to allow CFM regulations and hydrological monitoring. Participants noted too much time was being spent on modeling rather than addressing core design and impact questions.