Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(246)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-11-03

    PCHB Doc 005845: Memorandum Supporting CASE’s Motion to Intervene in ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Memorandum filed by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) supporting its motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. Washington State Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. CASE seeks intervenor status under Civil Rule 24 and WAC 371-08-420(1) in the appeal of Amended Clean Water Act 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) issued
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, NPDES, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    PCHB AR006202: ACC’s Separate Statement of Legal Issues — Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC’s Separate Statement of Legal Issues filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB Case No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington, against the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed November 2, 2001 via fax, received November 5, 2001. Lists 28 legal issues challenging
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SEPA, Third Runway
  • 2001-11-02

    EXH AR006206: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Stipulation Regarding Proposed Statement of Legal Issues, PCHB No. 01-160

    Stipulation filed November 2, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160 by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) against Washington State Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, pursuant to Pre-Hearing Order dated October 30, 2001. Three stipulated legal issues: (1) whether Ecology violated applicable law on public and agency notice, hearing, comment, and modification regarding the original 401/404
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-31

    EXH AR028232: Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 01-1 — Compensatory Mitigation Projects Under the Corps Regulatory Program

    US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter No. 01-1, dated 31 October 2001, providing guidance for the establishment and maintenance of compensatory mitigation projects under Section 404(a) of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. Covers debit/credit assessment methodology, role of preservation, inclusion of upland areas,
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Environment, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Regulations
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2135: Port Of Seattle Fill Criteria — Processed Materials Specifications for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 among Ann Kenny (Ecology), Kevin Fitzpatrick, John Drabek, Ed Abbasi, Raymond Hellwig, Joan Marchioro, Tom Young (ATG), Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle), Beth Clark, Paul Agid, Dave Walsh, and Jim Thomson regarding fill criteria under Condition E of the 401 certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-23

    Exhibit 2058: Port Of Seattle Email on Processed Materials and 401 Fill Criteria for Third Runway Embankment

    Email chain dated October 23, 2001 from Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle) to Ann Kenny and Raymond Hellwig, forwarding a message from Beth Clark, discussing which fill materials are subject to Condition E of the 401 water quality certification for the Third Runway Embankment. Port Of Seattle proposes that topsoil, utility backfill, and base course
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Elizabeth Leavitt, Fill Dirt, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-15

    PCHB Doc 01-160: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Pre-Hearing Order

    Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed for review of a Section 401 Clean Water Act certification and RCW chapter 90.48 order issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued an amended 401 Certification on September
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-15

    PCHB Doc 6284: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Draft Pre-Hearing Order, PCHB No. 01-160

    Draft Pre-Hearing Order in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. ACC filed appeal on August 23, 2001 of a section 401 Clean Water Act certification and order under RCW chapter 90.48 issued by Ecology to Port Of Seattle; Ecology rescinded and reissued amended
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-10-15

    PCHB 01-160: Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160, Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (amended-1), issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to Port Of Seattle on September 21, 2001. ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) sought to stay the §401 Clean Water Act certification, a prerequisite to a §404 permit
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2001-10-10

    PCHB Doc 01-133/01-160: Ecology Statement of Issues, Preliminary Witness and Exhibit List — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Respondent Washington State Department of Ecology statement of issues, preliminary witness list, and exhibit list filed in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. The central issue is whether Ecology had reasonable assurance that water quality standards would be met when issuing a Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "EXH AR003129: ACC and CASE Opposition to Ecology’s Motion in Limine re WAC 371-08-475(7)" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V