Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(245)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007184: Declaration of Robert Sheckler in Support of ACC’s Reply on Motion for Stay

    Declaration of Robert Sheckler, Mayor Pro Tem and City Councilmember of Des Moines WA and Chair of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) Executive Committee, filed in PCHB cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160 in support of ACC’s reply on motion for stay of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 and CZMA concurrency statement issued by Washington State
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 7332: Stipulation and Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1)

    Stipulation and Order filed October 8, 2001 before the Washington State Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in Case Nos. 01-133, 01-150, and 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appealed Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications issued by the Washington State Department of Ecology under Order Numbers 1996-4-02325 (August 10, 2001) and amended 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1, September 21,
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    Exhibit 210: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    In a 2001 declaration filed with Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board, environmental reviewer Tom Luster argues that the state Department of Ecology's water quality certification for the Sea-Tac Airport expansion was based on speculation rather than the legally required 'reasonable assurance' that water quality standards would be met. Luster contends the certification lacks sufficient evidentiary support and that the approved stormwater and low-flow mitigation plans fall far short of adequately protecting state waters. He warns that accepting this certification approach could set a damaging precedent for future water quality reviews of major projects across Washington State.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-10-08

    PCHB Doc 6513: Stipulation and Order — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-1)

    Stipulation and Order filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in PCHB Case Nos. 01-133, 01-150, and 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) appealed Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications issued by the Washington Department of Ecology under Order Number 1996-4-02325 (issued August 10, 2001) and rescinded/amended Order Number 1996-4-02325
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR006737: ACC Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion for Stay — Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) reply memorandum filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Case Nos. 01-133 and 01-160, in support of ACC’s motion for a stay of Washington Department of Ecology Section 401 Clean Water Act certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August 10, 2001, reissued September 21, 2001, for Port
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007082: Reply Declaration of Tom Luster in Support of Stay — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB No. 01-133, No. 01-160)

    Reply declaration of Tom Luster filed October 8, 2001 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) for the State of Washington in Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle, case nos. 01-133 and 01-160. Addresses Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1) and CZMA concurrency statement issued August
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water QualityFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-08

    EXH AR007111: Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor, City of Burien — ACC v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-133 / 01-160

    Declaration of Sally Nelson, Mayor of Burien, filed October 8, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-133 and PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Nelson supports ACC’s request for a stay of Ecology’s Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification (Department of Ecology Orders No. 1996-4-02325 and
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, City of Burien, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 04
  • 2001-10-05

    EXH AR006520: Port Of Seattle Sur Reply Memorandum — ACC Motion for Stay, PCHB Nos. 01-133 & 01-160

    Port Of Seattle sur reply memorandum filed in Pollution Control Hearings Board cases No. 01-133 and No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Addresses ACC’s motion for stay of the amended §401 Certification for STIA, arguing: (1) WAC 173-225-030 requires public notice only for new applications, not amendments;
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, StormwaterFolderBox 03
  • 2001-10-02

    EXH AR025098: Decl. Ann Kenny — PCHB No. 01-133, Airport Communities Coalition v. Ecology

    This legal declaration by Ann Kenny, an Environmental Specialist with Washington State's Department of Ecology, was filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in a case involving the Airport Communities Coalition challenging the Port of Seattle. The document addresses water quality conditions attached to a Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification for Sea-Tac Airport expansion, specifically focusing on Low Flow Mitigation Plans for Walker, Miller, and Des Moines Creek basins affected by increased impervious surfaces. Kenny explains how Ecology required the Port to develop detailed mitigation measures, including stormwater vault pilot testing and contingency plans, to offset hydrological impacts caused by airport development.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of SeattleFolderBox 10
  • 2001-10-01

    EXH AR007337: ACC’s Notice of Appeal of Reissued/Amended Section 401 Certification

    Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) files Notice of Appeal with the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) of the Department of Ecology’s reissued/amended Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification Order No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended – 1), issued September 21, 2001, for Sea-Tac Airport (STIA) third runway project by Port Of Seattle. ACC raises nine supplemental grounds including violation
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings BoardFolderBox 04

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V