Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagClean Water Act(246)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-01-14

    PCHB Doc 5063: Ecology’s Response to ACC’s Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding the Absence of a Water Right

    Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) motion for summary judgment in PCHB No. 01-160, filed January 14, 2002 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board. Ecology argues that a water right is not required for reasonable assurance that water quality standards will be met under Clean Water Act § 401 Certification.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-01-14

    EXH AR021854: Helsell Fetterman to Army Corps Transmitting GeoSyntec Comments on Hart Crowser Geotechnical Summary RP, Third Runway Embankment Fill and West MSE Wall, STIA

    A January 2002 letter from law firm Helsell Fetterman, on behalf of the Airport Communities Coalition, raises concerns with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers about the Port of Seattle's revised construction plans for the Sea-Tac Third Runway. The Port switched from an in-place ground improvement approach to excavating up to three million cubic yards of material beneath the proposed retaining wall, a major change that critics argue could significantly harm Miller Creek and adjacent wetlands. Attached technical comments from GeoSyntec Consultants also identify deficiencies in the Port's geotechnical report and argue the changes undermine the Port's Clean Water Act Section 404 permit application.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-01-01

    Exhibit 200: Resume of Thomas R. Luster, Environmental Scientist, California Coastal Commission

    This document is the professional resume of Thomas R. Luster, an Environmental Scientist with the California Coastal Commission, detailing his career reviewing coastal development projects for compliance with environmental regulations. His background includes senior roles with the Washington State Department of Ecology, where he specialized in Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certifications and Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determinations. The resume focuses on environmental permitting, water quality, and coastal resource protection, and does not contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-12-26

    Exhibit 196: ACC’s Interrogatories Nos. 1-19 and Requests for Production Nos. 1-6 to Port Of Seattle and Port Of Seattle’s Objections and Responses Thereto

    This legal document contains the Port of Seattle's responses to interrogatories filed by the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) before Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board. The Port identifies expert witnesses expected to testify on topics including contaminated site cleanup, stormwater quality, wetland mitigation, and environmental review under SEPA and NEPA for Sea-Tac Airport's Master Plan Update projects. The document outlines each expert's anticipated testimony and the basis for their opinions in connection with Clean Water Act permit requirements.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-12-18

    Exhibit 141: Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle (PCHB 01-160)

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification No. 1996-4-02325 (amended-1), issued by Washington State Department of Ecology to the Port Of Seattle on September 21, 2001, in case PCHB 01-160. Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) filed the motion; Board members Kaleen Cottingham and Robert V. Jensen heard
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-12-01

    EXH AR017886: Low Streamflow Analysis and Summer Low Flow Impact Offset Facility Proposal — Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Master Plan Update Improvements

    Report prepared by Parametrix, Inc. with Aqua Terra Consultants, Earth Tech, Inc., Foster Wheeler Environmental Corporation, HNTB, and Pacific Groundwater Group for Port Of Seattle regarding Sea-Tac Airport Master Plan Update Improvements. Analyzes summer low streamflow impacts to Walker Creek and Des Moines Creek from planned airport projects and proposes an offset facility using underground
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Des Moines Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2001-11-30

    PCHB Doc 5855: CASE Intervenor’s Notice of Appeal of Reissued/Amended Section 401 Certification

    Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), represented by Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney P.L.L.C., files an Intervenor’s Notice of Appeal before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) challenging Washington Department of Ecology Order No. 1996-4-02325 (Amended-1), issued September 21, 2001 — a reissued/amended Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification directed to the
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-11-28

    EXH AR005862: ACC’s Reply on Motion to Supplement the Record on Motion for Stay — PCHB No. 01-160

    ACC’s reply brief filed November 28, 2001 in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle) opposing Port Of Seattle’s response to ACC’s Motion to Supplement the Record on Motion for Stay. ACC argues that Kelly Whiting (King County engineer under interagency contract with Ecology) sent
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-11-15

    EXH AR006162: Port Of Seattle Letter to PCHB on Plans and Reports Pursuant to §401 Certification, PCHB Case No. 01-160

    Letter from Foster Pepper & Shefelman (attorneys for Port Of Seattle) to Kaleen Cottingham, Presiding Officer, Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB Case No. 01-160), dated November 15, 2001, identifying plans and reports prepared or expected to be prepared pursuant to §401 Certification. Lists documents submitted on or before November 15, 2001 (Wetland A17 mitigation plan,
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-11-15

    PCHB Doc AR006187: ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle — Supplemental Stipulation Regarding Proposed Statement of Legal Issues

    Supplemental Stipulation filed in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Filed November 15, 2001, received by the Pollution Control Hearings Board November 16, 2001. Documents 21 agreed proposed legal issues for the Board’s consideration, covering Clean Water Act Section 401 certification for the
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 … Page 25
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Part150comparison 3" — , 2026

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V