Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagCASE(191)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-10-18

    Exhibit 87: Email from Tom Luster to Raymond Hellwig et al. Regarding Sea-Tac 401 Certification Issues

    Email dated October 18, 2000 from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Paula Ehlers, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Joan Marchioro (ATG) regarding Sea-Tac Airport Section 401 water quality certification requirements. Luster notes his minority opinion on what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet 401 requirements, and provides drafty notes from a prior
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2000-09-08

    EXH AR023947: Third Runway Update Talking Points — ECY SMT Briefing

    This September 2000 internal briefing document from the Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) outlines the agency's long-running regulatory review of the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, covering key environmental concerns such as wetland mitigation, stormwater management, and wildlife hazard management. It describes ongoing conflicts with the Port of Seattle over compliance with environmental permits, including a Clean Water Act Section 401 certification that was heavily conditioned in 1998 and subsequently withdrawn by the Port. The document also notes intensifying political pressure from legislators, the Governor's office, and community opposition groups threatening legal action over perceived environmental violations.
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, RCAA, Third Runway
  • 2000-09-07

    Exhibit 138: Smith & Lowney Letter to Ecology Regarding Port Of Seattle NPDES Permit Violations and Third Runway Water Quality Certification

    Fax cover sheet and two-page letter dated September 7, 2000 from Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. to Raymond Hellwig (Director, NW Regional Office, Washington Department of Ecology) and Tom Luster (Permit Coordination Unit, Ecology), on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) and Waste Action Project (WAP). Letter transmits a 60-day Notice
    TagsACC, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2000-05-19

    Exhibit 167: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Thomas Fitzsimmons Re: Sea-Tac 3rd Runway Permitting Timeline

    Email dated May 19, 2000 from Raymond Hellwig (City of Des Moines) to Thomas Fitzsimmons regarding the SeaTac 3rd Runway permitting process. Discusses tight July 2000 decision-making timeframe, King County review of Port Of Seattle stormwater management plan requiring up to 10 more weeks, development of a definitive issues list for the proposed runway, drafting
    TagsACC, CASE, City Of Des Moines, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 1999-12-13

    EXH 364: Letter Columbia Biological Assessments to Ecology CWA §401 Certification STIA Third Runway

    A December 1999 environmental assessment prepared for Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) concludes that the Port of Seattle failed to provide sufficient scientific evidence to assure compliance with Clean Water Act water quality standards for its Seattle-Tacoma International Airport expansion project. The report found that stormwater runoff from the airport was causing ongoing violations of toxic substances criteria — particularly for copper and zinc — in nearby Miller and Des Moines Creeks, with pollutant levels sometimes exceeding EPA limits by more than tenfold. The author argues that Ecology therefore lacked a scientifically defensible basis to issue a Section 401 water quality certification for the proposed wetland-filling and stormwater management improvements.
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Water Quality
  • 1999-11-29

    EXH AR024298: Letter to Army Corps Opposing Section 404 Permit STIA Third Runway

    In a November 1999 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the law firm Smith & Lowney submitted comments on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) opposing a permit for the Port of Seattle's proposed Third Runway expansion at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter argues that the permit should be denied because the project would violate federal and state water quality standards, including toxic effluent limits for copper and zinc, and cause significant degradation to U.S. waters. It urges the Corps to consider not only the direct environmental impacts of the proposed fill, but also the cumulative and secondary effects of all current and future airport operations when making its permitting decision.
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, CASE, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion, Clean Water Act, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 1999-11-15

    EXH AR043099: Court of Appeals Decision — ACC et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle et al. (No. 43100-5-I)

    Published opinion filed November 15, 1999, Washington Court of Appeals Division One, No. 43100-5-I. Cities of Des Moines, Burien, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and Airport Communities Coalition (appellants) v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle, and Commissioners of the Port Of Seattle (respondents). Consolidated with related cases including
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional Council, SEPA
  • 1999-06-17

    Fax to ACC: Port Of Seattle Plans to Haul Rock and Concrete to Sea-Tac Airport Site

    A June 1999 fax from Al Furney to Kristen Stewart of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) asks whether ACC members are aware of the Port of Seattle's announced plans to haul rock and concrete to the Sea-Tac Airport site. Furney notes that RCAA (Residents Against Airport Noise, or a related community group) is seeking a copy of Merlino's contract with the Port. The fax was copied to the City of Burien, City of Normandy Park, CASE representative Larry Corvari, and Chris Gower.
    TagsACC, CASE, Conveyor, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 1999-03-04

    Exhibit 2109: Email Chain RE: Friday Sea-Tac Airport Meeting on 401 Certification and Stormwater, Third Runway

    Email chain dated March 4, 1999 among Tom Luster, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Raymond Hellwig, and Paula Ehlers (Washington State Department of Ecology, NWRO) regarding a Friday meeting at the Army Corps of Engineers about Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway citizen group concerns. Attendees included Corps staff Tom Mueller, Gail Terzi, Jonathan Freedman, Siri Nelson, and citizen group
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, RCAA, Sea-Tac Airport, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 08052026 400420314 user requested document copy pdf
    1999-01-08

    Order Denying Respondent Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing and Staying Action

    In January 1999, the King County Superior Court denied the Port of Seattle's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion, ruling that a potential injury from wetland filling near the airport could not be ruled out. The case centered on the Port's plan to fill wetlands in Auburn as part of its Master Plan Update, which included construction of a proposed third air carrier runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The court stayed all further proceedings until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a final decision on the Port's wetland-filling permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
    TagsAuburn Wetland, CASE, Clean Water Act, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • StART SEA Stakeholder Advisory Round Table
    Add to CalendarMWednesday Aug 26, 5:00pm - 7:00pm
    Zoom (Virtual Meeting)
    START meetingagenda 2026826 final 0 pdf

    Meeting Objectives Introduce the primary feedback themes identified by StART members regarding StART’s Operating Procedures and determine areas that may warrant future discussion. 5:00 PM – Welcome Meeting Management Welcome Lead: Andrés Mantilla, Facilitator, Uncommon Bridges; Wendy Reiter, Airport Managing Director, POS 5:15 PM – Dinner: All participants eat. 5:30 PM – StART Operating Procedures

    [...]
  • Commercial Aviation Work Group
    Add to CalendarMThursday Sep 3, 10:00am - 1:30pm
    Virtual Meeting (Zoom)
    Cawg agenda sep 3 26 virtual pdf

    Meeting Agenda 10:00 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. | Welcome – Evan Nordby, Chair a. Introductions and Agenda Reviewb. Status of appointments and non-voting member invitationsc. Other updates as necessary 10:15 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. | Is it practical and legal to operate the western Washington [Puget Sound] airports as a single airport system? – Consultant

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Burien Airport Committee agenda, October 15, 2019" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V