TagCASE(191)
-
2000-10-18
Exhibit 87: Email from Tom Luster to Raymond Hellwig et al. Regarding Sea-Tac 401 Certification Issues
Email dated October 18, 2000 from Tom Luster (Ecology) to Raymond Hellwig, Paula Ehlers, Kevin Fitzpatrick, and Joan Marchioro (ATG) regarding Sea-Tac Airport Section 401 water quality certification requirements. Luster notes his minority opinion on what the Port of Seattle and Ecology must do to meet 401 requirements, and provides drafty notes from a prior -
2000-09-08
EXH AR023947: Third Runway Update Talking Points — ECY SMT Briefing
This September 2000 internal briefing document from the Washington State Department of Ecology (ECY) outlines the agency's long-running regulatory review of the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport, covering key environmental concerns such as wetland mitigation, stormwater management, and wildlife hazard management. It describes ongoing conflicts with the Port of Seattle over compliance with environmental permits, including a Clean Water Act Section 401 certification that was heavily conditioned in 1998 and subsequently withdrawn by the Port. The document also notes intensifying political pressure from legislators, the Governor's office, and community opposition groups threatening legal action over perceived environmental violations. -
2000-09-07
Exhibit 138: Smith & Lowney Letter to Ecology Regarding Port Of Seattle NPDES Permit Violations and Third Runway Water Quality Certification
Fax cover sheet and two-page letter dated September 7, 2000 from Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney, P.L.L.C. to Raymond Hellwig (Director, NW Regional Office, Washington Department of Ecology) and Tom Luster (Permit Coordination Unit, Ecology), on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) and Waste Action Project (WAP). Letter transmits a 60-day Notice -
2000-05-19
Exhibit 167: Email from Raymond Hellwig to Thomas Fitzsimmons Re: Sea-Tac 3rd Runway Permitting Timeline
Email dated May 19, 2000 from Raymond Hellwig (City of Des Moines) to Thomas Fitzsimmons regarding the SeaTac 3rd Runway permitting process. Discusses tight July 2000 decision-making timeframe, King County review of Port Of Seattle stormwater management plan requiring up to 10 more weeks, development of a definitive issues list for the proposed runway, drafting -
1999-12-13
EXH 364: Letter Columbia Biological Assessments to Ecology CWA §401 Certification STIA Third Runway
A December 1999 environmental assessment prepared for Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) concludes that the Port of Seattle failed to provide sufficient scientific evidence to assure compliance with Clean Water Act water quality standards for its Seattle-Tacoma International Airport expansion project. The report found that stormwater runoff from the airport was causing ongoing violations of toxic substances criteria — particularly for copper and zinc — in nearby Miller and Des Moines Creeks, with pollutant levels sometimes exceeding EPA limits by more than tenfold. The author argues that Ecology therefore lacked a scientifically defensible basis to issue a Section 401 water quality certification for the proposed wetland-filling and stormwater management improvements. -
1999-11-29
EXH AR024298: Letter to Army Corps Opposing Section 404 Permit STIA Third Runway
In a November 1999 letter to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the law firm Smith & Lowney submitted comments on behalf of Citizens Against Seatac Expansion (CASE) opposing a permit for the Port of Seattle's proposed Third Runway expansion at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter argues that the permit should be denied because the project would violate federal and state water quality standards, including toxic effluent limits for copper and zinc, and cause significant degradation to U.S. waters. It urges the Corps to consider not only the direct environmental impacts of the proposed fill, but also the cumulative and secondary effects of all current and future airport operations when making its permitting decision. -
1999-11-15
EXH AR043099: Court of Appeals Decision — ACC et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle et al. (No. 43100-5-I)
Published opinion filed November 15, 1999, Washington Court of Appeals Division One, No. 43100-5-I. Cities of Des Moines, Burien, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and Airport Communities Coalition (appellants) v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle, and Commissioners of the Port Of Seattle (respondents). Consolidated with related cases including -
1999-06-17
Fax to ACC: Port Of Seattle Plans to Haul Rock and Concrete to Sea-Tac Airport Site
A June 1999 fax from Al Furney to Kristen Stewart of the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) asks whether ACC members are aware of the Port of Seattle's announced plans to haul rock and concrete to the Sea-Tac Airport site. Furney notes that RCAA (Residents Against Airport Noise, or a related community group) is seeking a copy of Merlino's contract with the Port. The fax was copied to the City of Burien, City of Normandy Park, CASE representative Larry Corvari, and Chris Gower. -
1999-03-04
Exhibit 2109: Email Chain RE: Friday Sea-Tac Airport Meeting on 401 Certification and Stormwater, Third Runway
Email chain dated March 4, 1999 among Tom Luster, Kevin Fitzpatrick, Raymond Hellwig, and Paula Ehlers (Washington State Department of Ecology, NWRO) regarding a Friday meeting at the Army Corps of Engineers about Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway citizen group concerns. Attendees included Corps staff Tom Mueller, Gail Terzi, Jonathan Freedman, Siri Nelson, and citizen group -
1999-01-08
Order Denying Respondent Port Of Seattle’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing and Staying Action
In January 1999, the King County Superior Court denied the Port of Seattle's motion to dismiss a lawsuit brought by Citizens Against SeaTac Expansion, ruling that a potential injury from wetland filling near the airport could not be ruled out. The case centered on the Port's plan to fill wetlands in Auburn as part of its Master Plan Update, which included construction of a proposed third air carrier runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The court stayed all further proceedings until the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued a final decision on the Port's wetland-filling permit under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.