TagCASE(191)

Summary statement for deposition publication filed by ACC and CASE in PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle), pursuant to Board Order of March 19, 2002. Deponent Ray Hellwig, Director of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, deposed January 8, 2002 regarding procedure and basis for issuance of Sea-Tac 401

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case 01-160 denial of Certificates of Appealability filed by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) under RCW 34.05.518 and RCW 43.21B.320(5). ACC and CASE sought direct Court of Appeals review of Thurston County Superior Court petitions (Cause No. 02-2-00029-8 and Cause No. 01-2-02386-9) arising from the

Petition for Review of Agency Action filed January 8, 2002 in Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) against State of Washington Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), Department of Ecology, and Port of Seattle. Challenges three PCHB orders in ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and

ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) file an application for direct review by Washington Court of Appeals Division II of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) ‘Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification’ (PCHB No. 01-160), issued December 17, 2001, and appealed by Port Of Seattle to

Port Of Seattle petition for judicial review filed in Superior Court of Washington, Thurston County, challenging the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Granting Motion to Stay the Effectiveness of Section 401 Certification related to the proposed third runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Petitioner Port Of Seattle represented by Linda J. Strout, Traci M.

Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) case PCHB 01-160 order granting summary judgment in favor of Port Of Seattle on Issue 14 (SEPA compliance). ACC (Airport Communities Coalition) and CASE (Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion) appealed the §401 water quality certification issued by Ecology, a prerequisite for a §404 dredge and fill permit from the U.S. Army

PCHB No. 01-160. Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), represented by Smith & Lowney P.L.L.C. (Richard A. Poulin, WSBA #27782), submits its preliminary witness and exhibit list as required by the Board’s Order Granting Intervention dated December 21, 2001. Witnesses listed: Kate Rhoads and Bob Furstenberg (King County DNR). Exhibits listed: (1) construction stormwater monitoring documents

Summary statement for deposition publication submitted pursuant to Order Granting Appellant’s Motion to Publish Depositions of Ecology Managers and CR 30(b)(6) Designated Witnesses dated March 19, 2002, in ACC & CASE v. Dept. of Ecology & Port of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160. Deponent Peter Kmet, P.E., Senior Environmental Engineer, Toxics Cleanup Program, DOE Headquarters Policy

Reply brief filed December 17, 2001 by Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE), represented by Richard A. Poulin of Smith & Lowney P.L.L.C., supporting CASE’s motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Case is Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. Washington State Department of Ecology and

Washington State Department of Ecology’s response to Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) motion to intervene in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Ecology concurs with Port Of Seattle’s requested limits on intervention and does not oppose CASE’s motion. Filed December 10, 2001; signed