Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagACC(1548)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR018360: Sheldon & Associates Response to 2000 Public Notice Comments — Water Movement Through Fill and MSE Wall

    Sheldon & Associates letter dated February 15, 2001, responding to public notice comments regarding the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport Masterplan Update Projects Section 404/401 Permits. Addresses movement of water through embankment fill and Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) wall, drainage layer design to prevent excess pore pressures, rock underdrain clogging prevention using Group 1A filter material, shallow
    TagsACC, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-15

    EXH AR019097: Sheldon & Associates to Army Corps & Ecology — STIA Third Runway Natural Resource Mitigation Plan Review

    A 2001 environmental review letter from Sheldon & Associates, commissioned by the Airport Communities Coalition, challenges the Port of Seattle's technical documents for the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The review finds that the Port has not adequately demonstrated that massive fill placement and engineered retaining walls would avoid long-term damage to downslope wetlands, groundwater flows, and Miller Creek. Key unresolved concerns include the reliability of the proposed underdrain system, incomplete baseline data, and the lack of independent construction oversight.
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-14

    Exhibit 158: Ecology Informational Meeting Notes with Erik and Ann, 2-14-01

    Handwritten notes from an Ecology informational meeting with Erik and Ann dated February 14, 2001 (AR 018355-018357). Topics include stormwater plan analysis from Kelly Whiting and John Drybeck (water quality staff), Vasen Farm farmed wetland ratios (1:1 in-basin acreage, 2:1 out-of-basin replacement), enforcement vs. restoration, prior converted designation, Corps of Engineers wetland determinations, 509 overpass,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-13

    EXH 332: Declaration John J. Strunk Supporting Response Opposing ACC Motion for Stay

    A declaration by geologist John J. Strunk of Associated Earth Sciences, Inc. (AESI) submitted to Washington State's Pollution Control Hearings Board describes groundwater contamination studies conducted at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Sea-Tac) in connection with the proposed Third Runway project. The studies found that while contamination exists in shallow groundwater zones within the Airport's Aircraft Operations and Maintenance Area (AOMA), it is isolated and located approximately 2,800 feet from the Third Runway site, with water flow predominantly directed away from that area. AESI concluded that subsurface utility lines do not appear to be a significant pathway for contaminant migration toward the Third Runway construction zone.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 09
  • 2001-02-13

    EXH AR023568: CV Patrick C. Lucia, GeoSyntec Consultants

    This document is a professional curriculum vitae for Patrick C. Lucia, a civil engineer and Principal at GeoSyntec Consultants specializing in geotechnical engineering, landslides, and slope stability. It details his education, professional registrations, career history, and representative project experience, including bridge seismic reviews, landslide repairs, and reservoir stability evaluations in California. Note: This document does not appear to contain content related to Sea-Tac Airport noise policy.
    TagsACC, EIS, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR017360: Part IX Tables — MTCA WAC 173-340-900 Method A Cleanup Levels for Ground Water

    Exhibit AR017360, Part IX Tables from MTCA Cleanup Regulation WAC 173-340-900, dated February 12, 2001. Contains Table 720-1, Method A Cleanup Levels for Ground Water, listing hazardous substances including arsenic, benzene, benzo(a)pyrene, cadmium, chromium, DDT, 1,2-dichloroethane (EDC), ethylbenzene, ethylene dibromide (EDB), lead, lindane, methylene chloride, mercury, MTBE, naphthalenes, PCB mixtures, radium 226, tetrachloroethylene, toluene, trichloroethylene,
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, WAC, Water QualityFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR019613: WAC 173-340-747 Deriving Soil Concentrations Groundwater Protection MTCA

    This Washington State regulation (WAC 173-340-747) establishes methods for determining safe soil contamination levels that protect groundwater quality at cleanup sites. It outlines several scientific approaches, including three-phase and four-phase partitioning models, leaching tests, and empirical demonstrations, to calculate the maximum allowable concentration of hazardous substances in soil before they risk contaminating groundwater. The regulation requires that soil concentrations not cause groundwater cleanup level exceedances and not result in the buildup of nonaqueous phase liquids in or on groundwater.
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WACFolderBox 09
  • 2001-02-12

    EXH AR017506: WAC 173-340-740 MTCA Cleanup Regulation — Unrestricted Land Use Soil Cleanup Standards

    WAC 173-340-740 from the Model Toxics Control Act (MTCA) Cleanup Regulation, published February 12, 2001, establishing unrestricted land use soil cleanup standards. Covers Method A, Method B (standard and modified), and petroleum mixture cleanup levels including Equations 740-1 through 740-3 for noncarcinogens and carcinogens. Specifies default exposure parameters: soil ingestion rate 200 mg/day, average body
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, soil, WACFolderBox 08
  • 2001-02-08

    EXH AR049869: Hart Crowser Letter — Comments on 404/401 Permit Applications for Port Of Seattle Third Runway MSE Retaining Walls

    Letter dated February 8, 2001 from Hart Crowser Principal Geotechnical Engineer to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jonathan Freedman) and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny), documenting comments made at the January 26, 2001 public hearing on 404/401 permit applications J-4978-30-06. Comments focus on the design and independent technical review of mechanically stabilized earth
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third RunwayFolderBox 21
  • 2001-02-08

    Exhibit 2060: Ecology Response to PDA Requests on Dam Safety and MSE Wall Review, Plus Memorandum on Retaining Wall Alternatives for Miller Creek

    Email dated February 8, 2001 from Ann Kenny (Ecology Senior Environmental Specialist) to Andrea Grad, Peter Eglick, and Kevin Stock responding to PDA requests regarding Chapter 173-175 WAC Dam Safety review of Port Of Seattle Third Runway stormwater facilities. Covers ISW Lagoon #3, 25.5 acre-foot pond (SDW1A), 37.91 acre-foot pond (SDW1B), MSE wall Dam Safety
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Miller Creek, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third RunwayFolderBox 12

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 … Page 155
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V