Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Tax Revenue in the State of Washington 1983-2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Policy
      • Legislative Agenda 2027
      • Airport mitigation for the twenty first century
      • Port Dracula
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The SAMP
      • SAMP Public Comment Template
        • Two versions of Appendix K: NEPA/SEPA 2018 vs 2023
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPuget Sound Regional Council(191)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2000-05-11

    EXH AR018379: Email — Meeting with Mic Dinsmore, Port Of Seattle, Wes Ulman, PSRC, and Governor re Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway

    Email from Raymond Hellwig (Ecology) to Thomas Fitzsimmons, copied to Tom Luster and others, dated May 11, 2000, regarding a meeting arranged by Martha Choe (CTED) for May 16, 2000 between Governor Gary Locke, Wes Ulman, and Mic Dinsmore (Port Of Seattle) about the Sea-Tac Airport third runway project. Agenda items include Ecology’s timetable for
    TagsACC, Ecology, Mic Dinsmore, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third RunwayFolderBox 08
  • 2000-04-25

    EXH AR023714: Email Martha Choe (CTED) to Tom — 401 Permit Concerns Third Runway

    A April 25, 2000 email from Martha Choe of the Washington State Community, Trade and Economic Development office to a colleague at the Department of Ecology summarizes concerns raised by the Port of Seattle regarding delays in obtaining a 401 water quality permit for Sea-Tac Airport's proposed third runway. Key issues include the FAA's unfamiliarity with Endangered Species Act requirements after taking over the review from the Army Corps of Engineers, King County's slow progress on stormwater documentation, and formatting problems that caused further delays. The email warns that if the permit is not issued by July 21, 2000, the third runway's inclusion in the regional transportation plan—and its federal funding eligibility—could be jeopardized.
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third RunwayFolderBox 10
  • 1999-11-15

    City of Des Moines, et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council, et al.

    Court of Appeals of Washington,Division 1. The CITY OF DES MOINES, The City of Burien, The City of Federal Way, The City of Normandy Park, The City of Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and The Airport Communities Coalition, Appellants, v. The PUGET SOUND REGIONAL COUNCIL, The Executive Board of the Puget Sound Regional Council,
    CategoriesLitigation TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Des Moines, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Third Runway
  • 1999-11-15

    EXH AR043083: City of Des Moines et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council — Court of Appeals Opinion No. 42306-1-I

    Washington Court of Appeals Division One published opinion (No. 42306-1-I, filed November 15, 1999) in City of Des Moines, City of Burien, City of Federal Way, City of Normandy Park, City of Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and Airport Communities Coalition v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Executive Board of PSRC, Port of Seattle, and
    TagsACC, Caselaw, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac Airport, Third RunwayFolderBox 18
  • 1999-11-15

    EXH AR043099: Court of Appeals Decision — ACC et al. v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle et al. (No. 43100-5-I)

    Published opinion filed November 15, 1999, Washington Court of Appeals Division One, No. 43100-5-I. Cities of Des Moines, Burien, Federal Way, Normandy Park, Tukwila, Highline School District No. 401, and Airport Communities Coalition (appellants) v. Puget Sound Regional Council, Port Of Seattle, and Commissioners of the Port Of Seattle (respondents). Consolidated with related cases including
    TagsACC, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional Council, SEPAFolderBox 18
  • 1999-08-10

    Port Of Seattle Submittals to Expert Panel: Airport Litigation Documents (1994–1997)

    This archival record (Box 1314) contains airport litigation documents from 1994–1997, held by the Puget Sound Regional Council's Administration office. Key materials include a Growth Management Staff Advisory Committee policy analysis on siting a major supplemental airport in the Central Puget Sound region, Port of Seattle submittals to an expert panel in response to a 1/9/95 Noise Order, and exhibits provided to attorney David Bricklin in 1997. The records are stored at the Washington State Archives.
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Port Of Seattle, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Second AirportFolderRecords Transferred to WA State Archives
  • 1314 POS submittals to panel archives pdf
    1999-08-10

    Port Of Seattle Submittals to Expert Panel: Airport Litigation Documents (1994–1997)

    This archival record (CID 10989, Box 01282, Historical Box No. 1314) was prepared by Angie Daniels on 10 August 1999 for the Administration Office of Record. Contents include Airport Litigation Documents: Growth Management Staff Advisory Committee policy analysis on siting a major supplemental airport in the Central Puget Sound Region (8/10/94), Port of Seattle submittals to an expert panel in response to a 1/9/95 Noise Order (2/23/95 and 10/16/95), and lawsuit exhibits provided to David Bricklin (Books 1 and 2, 8/26/97), now held at WA State Archives.
    TagsExpert Arbitration Panel, Port Of Seattle, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Second AirportFolderRecords Transferred to WA State Archives
  • 1998-06-11

    Documents catalogued as received in 1992

    This catalog lists documents received in 1992 related to aviation planning and noise policy in the Puget Sound region, with a focus on Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA). It includes environmental impact statements, noise exposure maps, community association comments, budget documents, and FAA regulatory guides, many connected to the 'Flight Plan Project' — a regional air transportation study. Several items were donated by attorney J. Richard Aramburu and other community stakeholders involved in airport noise and development issues.
    TagsEnvironmental Impact Statement, Flight Plan Project, Port Of Seattle, Puget Sound Regional Council, RCAA, Sea-Tac AirportFolderRCAA
  • 1998-06-11

    Documents catalogued as received in 1990

    This is a library catalog sheet listing documents received in 1990 related to regional planning and community concerns in the Seattle-Tacoma area. It includes two versions of the 'Vision 2020' environmental impact statement published by the Puget Sound Regional Council (PSRC), as well as a community document titled 'The Injustice of It All' authored by a group called Enraged Housewives. The catalog was originally created in June 1998 and last revised in August 2002.
    TagsEIS, Environmental Impact Statement, History, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, RCAAFolderRCAA
  • 1997-07-01

    PSRC Property Acquisition Financial Feasibility Study

    A study commissioned by the Puget Sound Regional Council to assess the financial feasibility of establishing a funding mechanism for acquiring and redeveloping properties adversely impacted by regionally significant essential public facilities. The study examines case study areas near the Auburn Rail Yard, Sea-Tac International Airport, and the proposed Everett 112th Street SE HOV Lanes
    TagsLand Use, Noise Mitigation, property, PSRC, Puget Sound Regional Council, Sea-Tac AirportFolderStudiesStudy TopicsProperty

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 … Page 20
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Burien
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Oct 17: 10:00am

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — SeaTac
    Add to CalendarMMonday Oct 19: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]
  • Part 150 NCP Workshop — Des Moines
    Add to CalendarMTuesday Oct 20: 6:00pm

    Attend a Port of Seattle open house on the Part 150 Study Noise Compatibility Program (NCP). The Part 150 program determines the noise boundary around the airport and opportunities for noise mitigation such as sound insulation.

    [...]

[See all...]


Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram
  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Complain about one flight
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V