Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2001-06-25

    Follow-up comments on stormwater, hydrology, and hydraulics aspects of proposed 3rd runway and related development actions at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

    Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, provides follow-up comments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology on stormwater, hydrology, and hydraulics aspects of the proposed third runway at Sea-Tac Airport. The letter responds to the Port of Seattle’s April 30, 2001 responses to earlier NHC comments
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-25

    EXH AR029190: 401 Permit Decision-Making, Sea-Tac Airport Third Runway — Final Meeting Notes, Low Flow Analysis, June 25, 2001

    Final meeting notes prepared by Kate Snider of Floyd & Snider Inc. for the 401 Permit Decision-Making process for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway project, covering Low Flow Analysis discussions held June 25, 2001. Attendees included representatives from Washington State Department of Ecology (Ann Kenny, John Drabeck), King County (Kelly Whiting), Port of Seattle
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway, Water Quality
  • 2001-06-25

    401 Permit Decision-Making Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway: Low Flow Analysis Meeting Notes

    Final meeting notes from a June 25, 2001 session on low flow analysis for the Sea-Tac International Airport Third Runway 401 Permit Decision-Making process. The meeting covered methodology for evaluating modeling results to determine stream flow impacts and mitigation requirements, vault filling estimates, slice model status, and non-hydrologic effects. Modeling results were not yet available
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 73: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification — Port Of Seattle Third Runway

    Memorandum from Ching-Pi Wang to Ann Kenny (cc: Ray Hellwig, Roger Nye, John Wietfeld, Steve Alexander) dated June 22, 2001, outlining Toxics Cleanup Program (TCP) recommendations for 401 certification related to the Port Of Seattle Third Runway project. Three recommendations: (1) Port Of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant
    TagsACC, Ecology, Environmental Impact Statement, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    Exhibit 2043: TCP Recommendations for 401 Certification and Analysis of Preferential Ground Water Flow Paths Relative to Proposed Third Runway, STIA

    Memo dated June 22, 2001 from Ching-Pi Wang (Toxics Cleanup Program, TCP) to Ann Kenny regarding TCP recommendations for 401 certification related to the proposed Third Runway at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (STIA). Three recommendations: (1) Port of Seattle to develop a plan by September 14, 2001 to monitor contaminant transport to soil and groundwater via
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, MTCA, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2001-06-22

    GeoSyntec Consultants Response to Port Of Seattle Comments on February 16, 2001 Letter

    GeoSyntec Consultants, retained by the Airport Communities Coalition, responds to the Port of Seattle’s April 30, 2001 comments regarding their earlier technical review of the Third Runway Expansion Project at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The letter addresses concerns about the West Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall, including insufficient laboratory strength testing, potential underestimation of liquefiable materials,
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-21

    EXH AR018374: Record of Telecon with Ann Kenny Regarding Scope Changes, Low Flow Meeting, and Parametrix

    Record of telecon dated 6-21-01, call from Ann Kenny. Notes that Port has agreed to pay for new scope and minor plan sheet changes. Jim to be given confirmation in writing. July 9th Low Flow meeting scheduled. Parametrix involvement noted — panel 6 may be larger with potential impact. Meeting with Corps to be set
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Handwritten Notes, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-21

    EXH AR050665: Ecology & Port Of Seattle Letter to Army Corps of Engineers Extending Coastal Zone Management Consistency Review Deadline

    Letter dated June 21, 2001 from Jeannie Summerhays (Washington Department of Ecology, Northwest Regional Office) and Elizabeth Leavitt (Port Of Seattle, Aviation Environmental Programs, Seattle-Tacoma International Airport) to Tom Mueller, Chief, Department of the Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. Pursuant to 15 CFR § 930.60, Ecology and the Port Of Seattle mutually
    TagsACC, Army Corp of Engineers, Ecology, Elizabeth Leavitt, Foster Pepper, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2001-06-20

    Rebuttal to Port Of Seattle’s Response to 401/404 Comments

    A letter from John A. Strand, Ph.D. of Columbia Biological Assessments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, rebutting the Port of Seattle’s responses to comments on the proposed Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal focuses on the Miller Creek Relocation Project, arguing that the
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2001-06-20

    Rebuttal to Port Of Seattle’s Response to 401/404 Comments

    A letter from John A. Strand, Ph.D. of Columbia Biological Assessments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and Washington State Department of Ecology, rebutting the Port of Seattle’s responses to 401/404 permit comments regarding the Master Plan Update Improvements at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. The rebuttal focuses on the Miller Creek Relocation Project, arguing that
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Upcoming Events

  • KCIA 2026 FOD Walk
    Add to CalendarMSaturday Aug 15, 7:30am - 10:00am
    9404 East Marginal Way South, Seattle, WA 98108
    Event image 2

    Museum of FlightSeattle, WA Saturday, August 15  •  7:30 AM – 10 AM Overview Join us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk—let’s keep the runway clean and have some fun together! Join Us for the KCIA 2026 FOD Walk! Get ready to step out and enjoy an awesome in-person event all about keeping our spaces

    [...]

[See all...]


Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "Respondent Port Of Seattle’s first set of interrogatories and requests for production directed to appellant Airport Communities Coalition and answers and responses thereto" — , 2002

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V