Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-05

    Respondent Port Of Seattle’s first set of interrogatories and requests for production directed to appellant Airport Communities Coalition and answers and responses thereto

    This document contains the Port of Seattle’s first set of interrogatories and requests for production directed to the Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) in PCHB No. 01-160, along with ACC’s answers and objections. The document includes ACC’s responses regarding expert witnesses, including Bill Rozeboom and Malcolm Leytham of Northwest Hydraulic Consultants, and their prior testimony in
    TagsACC, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR003187: Port Of Seattle Joinder in Department of Ecology’s Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475 (PCHB No. 01-160)

    Port Of Seattle joinder filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB No. 01-160 supporting Department of Ecology’s motion in limine to exclude testimony of Thomas R. Luster pursuant to WAC 371-08-475(7). Argues that ER 701 prohibits lay witness opinion testimony and that WAC 371-08-475(7) precludes Luster from serving as an expert, requesting exclusion of all opinion
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, CASE, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, WAC
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR037219: Draft Map — Wetlands Near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Northern Map)

    Draft figure (AR 037219) prepared by Parametrix, Inc. on March 5, 2002, mapping wetlands near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (northern section) at scale 1:2400. Shows surveyed wetland boundaries, estimated wetland boundaries, other estimated or unverified wetlands outside project area, parcel boundaries, temporary impacts, and permanent impacts. Elevation points marked at 335.5, 335.3, 324.4. Administrative Record number
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Map, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2002-03-05

    EXH AR037220: Draft Figure 2 — Wetlands Near the Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (Southern Map)

    AR037220 draft wetland map (Figure 2, Southern Map) prepared by Parametrix, Inc., dated March 05, 2002, depicting wetlands near Seattle-Tacoma International Airport. Map shows surveyed wetland boundaries, estimated wetland boundaries, SASA boundaries, temporary and permanent impact boundaries, and wetlands outside project area at scale 1:2400. Includes elevation data points and wetland delineation markers across the
    TagsACC, Environmental Impact Statement, Map, Pollution Control Hearings Board, SAMP, Sea-Tac Airport
  • 2002-03-05

    PCHB Doc 3146: Declaration of Thomas R. Luster — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, No. 01-160

    Declaration of Thomas R. Luster filed March 5, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Luster responds to Ecology’s Motion in Limine seeking to strike portions of his pre-filed testimony on grounds he is serving as an expert witness. Luster asserts
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-04

    EXH AR003176: Letter from Helsell Fetterman to PCHB Re Chess Clock Format, PCHB No. 01-160 ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Letter dated March 4, 2002 from Peter Eglick of Helsell Fetterman LLP to Presiding Officer Kaleen Cottingham of the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160, ACC v. Dept. of Ecology and Port of Seattle) regarding use of a chess clock format during hearing proceedings. Letter argues for a per-side rather than per-party chess clock
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-04

    PCHB Doc 002380: Order Denying Motion in Limine Re WAC 371-08-475 — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) Order Denying Motion in Limine in case PCHB 01-160, filed March 4, 2002. Department of Ecology moved to strike pre-filed written direct testimony of Thomas R. Luster submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC), citing WAC 371-08-475(7) prohibiting former department employees from appearing as expert witnesses in proceedings where they took
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-04

    EXH AR003190: Ecology Motion in Limine Re: WAC 371-08-475(7) — ACC Expert Witness Thomas R. Luster, PCHB No. 01-160

    Motion in limine filed March 4, 2002 by State of Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) seeking to strike pre-filed expert witness testimony of Thomas R. Luster, a former Ecology employee, submitted by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC). Ecology argues WAC 371-08-475(7) prohibits former Ecology employees from appearing
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-02-28

    EXH AR003194: Erratum to Ecology’s Final List of Witnesses and Exhibits — Exhibit 240 (Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course Photographs)

    Erratum filed by Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in PCHB No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Adds omitted Exhibit No. 240 — Photographs of Vacca Farm and Tyee Golf Course — to Ecology’s Final Witness and Exhibit
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-02-28

    EXH AR003195: Joint Status Report and Estimate of Time Needed for Hearing — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Joint Status Report filed February 28, 2002 in PCHB Case No. 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Appeal of Clean Water Act Section 401 Certifications #1996-4-02325 and #1996-4-02325 (Amended-I) for Third Runway and Related Master Plan Updates. Parties report settlement is
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "PSRC Fiscal years 2026-2027 biennial budget and work plan: July 2025 – June 2027" — , 2025

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V