Skip to content
  • STNI
  • Statistics
    • Ops and Passengers
      • King County International Airport (Boeing Field) Annual Operations
    • Financials
    • Aviation fuel uplift in the State of Washington 2018 – 2025
      • Aviation Fuel Uplift at Sea-Tac Airport
    • Air Quality Monitoring
    • Flight Tracking
      • Flow and Flight Tracks
      • Five Year Comparison
      • Busiest Hours and Days
    • SEL Noise Reports & Graphs
      • About The Permanent Noise Monitors
      • Minutes of Quiet by Noise Monitor
      • Noise Events mapped
      • Noise Events (SEL)
    • Runways
    • Employees
    • Real Estate
      • Port Properties and Trees mapped
    • Parking
  • Events
  • Protest
    • Regular Events
    • Legislation 2026
    • Complain about a particular flight
    • Advocacy Organizations
    • Media Outlets
    • People
    • The Port of Seattle
      • Commission Meetings
      • Public Records Requests
      • StART
      • Highline Forum
    • Contact Your Electeds
  • Resources
    • FAQs
      • FAA Occurrences/Accidents/Indents
    • The unSustainable Airport Master Plan
      • SAMP NTP: 31 projects by the numbers
      • SEPA Draft EIS (2026)
      • SAMP Record of Decision/FONSI (2025)
      • SAMP Draft EA (October 2024)
      • 2018 Scoping
    • Port Packages
      • Port Package Property Costs
      • Port Packages mapped
      • The Port Package Explainer
      • So you want a (first-time) Port Package? Start here
      • Port Package Looker Upper
      • How do I determine if I have a Port Package or Avigation Easement?
      • Progress on Port Package Update legislation
      • Having a Port Package Problem?
      • Port Package Site Visit Follow-Up
    • Document Library
    • Explainers
      • The Airport Law Cheat Sheet
      • The Grant Explainer
    • External Articles
    • History
      • Timeline
      • The Sea-Tac Communities Plan
        • Sea-Tac Communities Plan – Planning Maps
      • PSRC Third Runway Decision Process
    • Studies
    • Videos
  • Stories
  • Mission
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
Scroll down to content

Get InformedStay Informedx

I understand that you will never share my information with anyone, you will only use it to keep me updated on relevant events and that I may unsubscribe at any time.

STNI

STNISea-Tac Noise.Info

  • Solve for Sea-Tac. Solve for every airport.
  • Since 2016, working to obtain justice for everyone living under the flight path.
  • Less Noise. Cleaner Air. Better Public Health. Compensation.
  • Everything you think you know about the airport is wrong.

TagPollution Control Hearings Board(1532)

Advanced Search Options

  • Dates
  • Media
    • External Articles
    • Images
    • PDFs
    • Video
    • Audio
  • Order By
  • 2002-03-08

    PCHB Doc 02777: Declaration of Ray Hellwig — ACC v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Declaration of Ray Hellwig, Regional Director at the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office, filed in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Hellwig attests to receiving a transcribed voicemail from Tom Luster on or about September 17, 2001, in which Luster disclosed he
    TagsACC, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 01-160: Direct Testimony of Gordon White on Behalf of Ecology

    Direct testimony of Gordon White, Program Manager for the Shorelands and Environmental Assistance (SEA) program at Washington State Department of Ecology, submitted in PCHB No. 01-160. Filed before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and Port
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB 01-160: Prefiled Testimony of Dr. William A. Stubblefield, Ph.D.

    Prefiled direct testimony of Dr. William A. Stubblefield, Ph.D., filed March 7, 2002, in PCHB case 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board for the State of Washington. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Testimony covers water quality standards, Ambient Water
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 03040: Direct Testimony of Chung Ki Yee on Behalf of Ecology — ACC/CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Chung Ki Yee, Environmental Engineer 3 in the Washington State Department of Ecology Toxics Cleanup Program, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board in PCHB No. 01-160 (Airport Communities Coalition and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle). Yee describes deriving fill criteria for the Port Of Seattle Third
    TagsACC, Ecology, Model Toxics Control Act, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 002881: Direct Testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick on Behalf of Ecology — ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle, PCHB No. 01-160

    Direct testimony of Kevin Fitzpatrick, Section Manager of the Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office Water Quality Section, submitted before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB No. 01-160) on behalf of Ecology in the matter of Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. State of Washington Department of Ecology and
    TagsACC, Clean Water Act, NPDES, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Stormwater, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR016335: Pre-Filed Direct Testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E. — PCHB 01-160, ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle

    Pre-filed direct testimony of Paul S. Fendt, P.E., submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB), case No. PCHB 01-160, Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) v. Department of Ecology and Port Of Seattle. AR 016335. Testimony covers stormwater impacts from the MPU (Master Plan Update) improvements at Sea-Tac Airport, including
    TagsACC, Airport Communities Coalition, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle, Stormwater, Water Quality
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 002903: Direct Testimony of Dave Garland on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Dave Garland, hydrogeologist and Watershed Unit supervisor at Ecology’s Northwest Regional Office, submitted in PCHB No. 01-160 before the Pollution Control Hearings Board, State of Washington. Appellants are Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE); respondents are Ecology and Port Of Seattle. Garland details his background managing the legislature-mandated
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Third Runway
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 002914: Direct Testimony of Ann Kenny on Behalf of Ecology — PCHB No. 01-160 (ACC and CASE v. Ecology and Port Of Seattle)

    Direct testimony of Ann Kenny, Environmental Planner 4 at Washington Department of Ecology Northwest Regional Office (NWRO), submitted to the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) in case No. 01-160. Covers Ecology’s review of Port Of Seattle’s Sea-Tac International Airport (STIA) Master Plan Update Improvements under Clean Water Act Section 401 Certification and Coastal Zone Management
    TagsACC, CASE, Clean Water Act, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    EXH AR003129: ACC and CASE Opposition to Ecology’s Motion in Limine re WAC 371-08-475(7)

    Opposition brief filed March 7, 2002, by Airport Communities Coalition (ACC) and Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion (CASE) to the Department of Ecology’s motion in limine in PCHB No. 01-160, arguing that WAC 371-08-475(7) (Former Employee as Expert Witness) does not bar testimony by Thomas R. Luster. ACC argues Luster was reassigned from the Port of
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle
  • 2002-03-07

    PCHB Doc 01-160: ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle — Department of Ecology’s Pre-Filed Direct Testimony

    Department of Ecology’s Pre-Filed Direct Testimony in PCHB No. 01-160, ACC & CASE v. Ecology & Port Of Seattle, filed via FedEx on 2002-03-07 from Joan Marchioro at Attorney General/Ecology Division, Olympia WA 98502, to Rachel Paschal Osborn, Attorney at Law, Spokane WA 99201. Administrative Record number AR 015577. Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB) proceeding
    TagsACC, CASE, Ecology, PCHB, Pollution Control Hearings Board, Port Of Seattle

Posts pagination

Page 1 … Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 … Page 154
Sidebar On/Off

Help study childhood asthma. Get free HEPA filter!

read more...

Issues

Sea-Tac Airport is currently undergoing the largest and longest expansion in its history, collectively known as the Sustainable Airport Master Plan (SAMP). Some of it you can already hear, but you’re probably not aware of what it all means. Here’s what you need to know.
read more...

Read This!

As the source for federal transportation grants, the Puget Sound Regional Council was charged with developing a system to meet the growing need for commercial aviation. When the search for a second airport failed, they authorized the Port of Seattle to build the Third Runway, with a mandate to develop a noise abatement and mitigation program. In their effort to stop the Third Runway, the ACC argued over every detail of the Port's efforts--including property buyouts and sound insulation. The dispute was meant to be settled by a three member Expert Arbitration Panel. This is their final report. It finds 2-1, that the Port's program was insufficient in several respects. Despite that, funding for the Third Runway was approved by the PSRC, and the 'Port Package' program, proceeded largely unchanged. Expert Arbitration Panel's final decision finding that the Port of Seattle had not shown sufficient reduction in real on-the-ground noise impacts to satisfy noise reduction conditions required for approval of a third runway at Sea-Tac International Airport. The majority decision concluded the Port's noise abatement programs were insufficient despite being impressive in scope.
continue...

The Podcast!

Subscribe to the only podcast devoted to policies, politics, history, impacts for people living under the flight path everywhere. It’s definitely not just about noise!
  • Sea-Tac Noise.Info
  • Connect with STNI

    • Subscribe
    • Port Package Problem?
    • Donate
    • Podcast
    • Socials
      • Facebook
      • X (Twitter)
      • Bluesky
      • Instagram

    "SeaTac City Hall" — , 2019

  • Learn

    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Explainers
    • Youtube
    • Research Requests
    • Make a complaint
  • Goals

    Fulfill the promises of 1976:
    • Compensation
    • Reduced noise
    • Improved air quality
    • Environmental remediation
Login/Register
©2026•Data Privacy

Message

We use cookies to provide basic functionality. We also provide access to search engines in order to provide site analytics. We do not sell or share your data.
V V